Motor Lublin vs Raków Częstochowa: match statistics
Motor Lublin vs Raków Częstochowa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Motor Lublin played Raków Częstochowa in Ekstraklasa (Poland). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Motor Lublin: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Raków Częstochowa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Motor Lublin scores 1.33 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Raków Częstochowa scores 1.33 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Motor Lublin 63%, Raków Częstochowa 56%. Over 2.5: Motor Lublin 48%, Raków Częstochowa 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Raków Częstochowa has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.40. Motor Lublin: 11.8 shots per match, Raków Częstochowa: 14.1.
Match halves
Motor Lublin: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.52. Raków Częstochowa: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Motor Lublin: 46-60 (12 goals). Raków Częstochowa: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ekstraklasa: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Motor Lublin is the favorite based on form – in the last 5 matches they have a record of 3 wins and 2 draws, scored 6 goals and conceded only 2, which yields an average of 2.2 points per match. Raków Częstochowa, however, creates better chances by the numbers: away they average 5.64 shots on target, 14.5 attempts per match and xG of 1.74, but in the last 5 matches they have not won (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), scoring 8 and conceding 11, averaging 0.6 points per match. On the season level Motor at home scores 1.36 goals with xG 1.36 and concedes 1.07 goals per match (clean sheet in 43% of appearances), while Raków away records 1.57 goals, xG 1.74 and concedes 1.57 goals per match (clean sheet in only 21% of matches). This means that although Raków generates higher-quality chances (1.74 xG vs 1.36 for Motor) and more shots on target (5.64 vs 3.14), Motor’s current defensive trend – only 2 conceded goals in the last 5 matches and a lower proportion of matches without scoring (14% vs 21%) – gives the hosts the edge. Considering Motor’s 2.2 points per match versus Raków’s 0.6 in the last 5 fixtures, along with better clean sheet rate and fewer away losses for the home side (Motor loss rate 14% vs Raków away 43%), I tip a Motor victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Raków has a seasonal BTTS rate of 64% and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Motor has a seasonal BTTS of 46% and 40% in the last 5, which gives a clear advantage to the away-side Goal/Goal signal. Raków conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 per game), whereas Motor conceded only 2 goals in those five fixtures (0.4 per game), so the visitors regularly allow opponents to score. Statistically Raków creates more chances: xG 1.74 vs 1.61 for Motor, 5.64 shots on target vs 3.92 and a higher conversion rate 11% vs 8%, increasing the likelihood they will score. Considering the league BTTS at 57% and both teams having an equal 36 goals scored this season, I tip BTTS - Yes with a confidence of 70% vs 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total xG values indicate an open game: Motor’s xG is 1.61 while Raków concedes on average xG 1.42 — the mean implies expected goals for Motor ≈1.52. Similarly, Raków’s xG is 1.74 and Motor concedes on average xG 1.39, implying Raków ≈1.56; the sum of expected goals is about 3.08. A Poisson model at this total yields probability of Over 1.5 ≈81% and Over 2.5 ≈59%, consistent with seasonal Over 1.5 rates: 62% (Motor) and 79% (Raków) and Over 2.5: 31% and 57%. Additionally, Raków have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game) while Motor have conceded 2 goals in their last 5 (0.4 per game), and Raków’s matches show 64% BTTS on the season and 100% in the last 5 fixtures, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Therefore I recommend taking the Over at the 1.5 line as the strongest signal from the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Motor leading at half-time and winning) because the hosts have 3 wins in their last 5 matches (60%) versus Raków’s 0 wins (0%), and Motor led at the break in 3 of those 5 matches (60%) compared to Raków’s 1 of 5 (20%). In those five games Motor averaged 1.0 goals by half-time (6 goals total) and conceded 0.2 goals by half-time, whereas Raków averaged 0.2 goals by half and conceded 0.8, which favors the hosts after 45 minutes. Season-long figures show Raków with higher xG (1.74 vs 1.61) and a higher goals-per-game average (1.57 vs 1.08), but in their last 5 matches Raków conceded an average of 2.2 goals, so the season offensive edge is mitigated by poor recent form. Additionally, Motor has kept a clean sheet in 38% of season matches versus Raków’s 21% and has been statistically stronger in first halves recently; therefore the strongest signal is Motor to lead at the break and hold on for the win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Motor Lublin | Raków Częstochowa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Motor Lublin is 120% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Motor Lublin · 1 pts / match - Raków Częstochowa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Raków Częstochowa is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Motor Lublin · 1.26 goals / match - Raków Częstochowa
Motor Lublin scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Raków Częstochowa keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Raków Częstochowa scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Motor Lublin keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Motor Lublin
Over / Under - Raków Częstochowa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Motor Lublin is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Motor Lublin · 1.3 pts / match - Raków Częstochowa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Motor Lublin - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Raków Częstochowa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Motor Lublin
Raków Częstochowa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ekstraklasa).
Teams vs league
| Motor Lublin | Liga | Raków Częstochowa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.78 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 25% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 77% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Motor Lublin 0 - 0 - 1 Raków Częstochowa. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Motor Lublin vs Raków Częstochowa?
The Ekstraklasa match finished Motor Lublin 1:1 Raków Częstochowa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Motor Lublin vs Raków Częstochowa?
Motor Lublin score 1.33 goals per game on average and Raków Częstochowa 1.33. The Ekstraklasa average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Motor Lublin's matches and 56% of Raków Częstochowa's.
What form are Motor Lublin and Raków Częstochowa in?
Over the last 5 games Motor Lublin have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Raków Częstochowa 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Motor Lublin vs Raków Częstochowa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


