Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

MP vs Haka: match statistics

MP crest
MP
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Haka crest
Haka

MP vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

MP: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match. Haka: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 0.25 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Haka scores 2.33 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 0%, Haka 33%. Over 2.5: MP 0%, Haka 67%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Haka has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.26. MP: 9.5 shots per match, Haka: 14.0.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.00. Haka: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

MP: 16-30 (1 goals). Haka: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haka look like the favorites based on measurable advantages: they have scored 17 goals in their last 5 matches versus MP’s 8 and conceded only 2 goals compared to the hosts’ 6 in the same period. Haka average 2.2 points per game over the last five matches, while MP average 1.8, indicating superior results efficiency for the visitors. Quality-of-chance analysis shows similar xG – 1.26 for Haka vs 1.28 for MP – so both teams create comparable chances, but Haka possess a better defense reflected in lower xG against (0.63 vs 1.11). Additionally, MP have not yet won at home this season (Win% 0 and Loss% 100 in home matches), which diminishes home-field advantage. As a result I expect a away win, although with similar xG a draw cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

MP at home shows a strong attack: seasonal home goals average is 3.5 with xG 2.02 and 7.5 shots on target per match, indicating a high chance for the hosts to score. Haka away has a seasonal average of goals conceded 0.0 with 100% clean sheets and 0% BTTS, meaning in away matches this season they have not conceded and have had no Goal/Goal games. In the last 5 matches Haka scores on average 3.4 goals (17 goals in 5 matches) and concedes 0.4 goals on average (2 conceded in 5), which confirms they can score but rarely concede. MP, however, in the last 5 matches has conceded 1.2 goals on average and concedes 1.0 at home seasonally, so there is a chance for the opponent to score, but it is lower than Haka’s defensive signal. Considering Haka’s 100% away clean sheets and the league’s low BTTS rate of 32% with a high clean sheet rate of 84%, I favor the No Goal scenario and assess it at 65% versus 35% for BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG aggregation: MP’s xG is 2.02, xG conceded to Haka 0.63, which averaged yields a 1.33 goals forecast for the home side; similarly MP-against Haka xG of 1.23 and Haka’s xG of 1.26 average to 1.25 for the away side, totaling 2.58. MP averages 16.5 shots and 7.5 shots on target per match with a 21% conversion rate and scores 3.5 goals per match this season, indicating strong finishing ability. Haka averages 9.0 shots and 2.0 shots on target per match, but has scored 17 goals in the last 5 matches (3.4 avg) and has recent xG of 1.95, which also increases the likelihood of multiple goals. The expected 2.58 goals, combined recent xG totals (1.44 for MP and 1.95 for Haka, sum 3.39) and MP’s high conversion provide a strong signal for Over 1.5 and a moderate signal for Over 2.5. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line — high confidence (85%) — while Over 2.5 is also reasonable (62%); I rated Over 3.5 at 33% because the forecast 2.58 is below 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

MP has a clear offensive advantage: average xG 2.02 versus Haka’s 1.26, on average 16.5 shots including 7.5 on target versus the visitors’ 9.0 shots and 2.0 on target, and a conversion rate of 21.0% versus 0.0%, which strongly favors the home side. The away team draws at the break in 100% of their matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0) and averages 0.0 goals in the first half (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.0), while MP scores on average 0.5 goals before the break and leads at half-time in 50% of games (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.5, leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50.0). The strongest signal comes from second halves: MP averages 3.0 second-half goals (scored_2hg_avg_home = 3.0) with most goals occurring between the 61st–90th minutes (2 goals in 61–75 and 3 goals in 76–90), increasing the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Considering Haka’s zero shot conversion (shot_conversion_rate_away = 0.0) and MP’s superiority in xG and shots on target, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an MP victory after full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
MPHaka
10Shots10
MPHaka
4Shots on target4
MPHaka
1.18xG1.38
MPHaka
7Corners9
MPHaka
37Dangerous attacks65
MPHaka
6Fouls9
MPHaka
1Cards1
MPHaka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.25Goals scored / match2.33
MPHaka
0.75Goals conceded / match0.67
MPHaka
52%Average possession62%
MPHaka
3.75Shots on target / match5.67
MPHaka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match14
MPHaka
3.75Shots on target5.67
MPHaka
2.6%Shot conversion16.7%
MPHaka
52%Possession62%
MPHaka
1.26xG for1.76
MPHaka
1.13xG against1.03
MPHaka

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedHaka: Dominant
MPHaka
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.070.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haka is 123% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / match - MP · 1.67 pts / match - Haka

MP
LLLW
Season result split
25% W0% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Haka
DWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 832% better for: goals scored per match.

0.25 goals / match - MP · 2.33 goals / match - Haka

Haka is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - MP · 0.67 goals / match - Haka

MP scoring profile: more difficult

MP scores in 25% of matches (1 of 4 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

Haka scoring profile: strong

Haka scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

1Goals scored (season)7
MPHaka
3Goals conceded (season)2
MPHaka
1Average goals in match3
MPHaka
1Goals scored (last 5)7
MPHaka
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
MPHaka

How often they score at least...

25%1 goal67%
MPHaka
0%2 goals67%
MPHaka
0%3 goals33%
MPHaka
0%4 goals33%
MPHaka

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal33%
MPHaka
0%2 goals33%
MPHaka
0%3 goals0%
MPHaka
0%4 goals0%
MPHaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
MPHaka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MPHaka
0%Scored in both halves33%
MPHaka

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
MPHaka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
MPHaka
0%BTTS - last 533%
MPHaka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
MPHaka
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
MPHaka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MPHaka

2nd half

25%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MPHaka
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
MPHaka
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time67%
MPHaka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - MP · 1.33 pts / match - Haka

MP - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
Haka - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.33
MPHaka
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.33
MPHaka
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MPHaka
0.75Average goals (1st half)0.67
MPHaka
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
MPHaka
75%No goal before half-time67%
MPHaka

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)2.33
MPHaka
0Goals scored (2nd half)2
MPHaka
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
MPHaka
0.25Average goals (2nd half)2.33
MPHaka
75%Clean sheet after half-time67%
MPHaka
100%No goal after half-time33%
MPHaka

MP - second-half results

0% W75% R25% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haka - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.75
Goals scored / match0.30.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match0.80.3
1 goal75%25%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal75%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 75% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.332.33
Goals scored / match0.32.0
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.72.3
1 goal67%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%67%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Haka
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
20%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
295%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.7
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaHaka
Average goals in match 1.002.05 3.00
Both teams scored 0%32% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%42% 67%
Clean sheets 25%42% 67%
Goal before half-time 75%63% 67%
Goal after half-time 25%58% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HakaSubstitutionOn: Aaron Keto-DiyawaOff: Imani Lanquedoc
  2. MPSubstitutionOn: Akseli TervaniemiOff: Serge Atakayi
  3. HakaSubstitutionOn: Nika SitchinavaOff: Miika Mahlamäki
  4. HakaYellow cardAnton Lepola
  5. HakaSubstitutionOn: Kevin NurmiOff: Roni Pietsalo
  6. MPSubstitutionOn: Santeri SteniusOff: Eero Ylönen
  7. MPYellow cardVeikko Janhunen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs Haka?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 1:0 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs Haka?

MP score 0.25 goals per game on average and Haka 2.33. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 0% of MP's matches and 33% of Haka's.

What form are MP and Haka in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and Haka 1-2-0 (1.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs Haka?

The statistical background for MP vs Haka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.