Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 13 September 2026

MP vs KäPa: match statistics

MP crest
MP
0 : 1half-time 0:1
KäPa crest
KäPa

MP vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

MP: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. KäPa: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. KäPa scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 1.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 0%, KäPa 100%. Over 2.5: MP 0%, KäPa 100%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

MP has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.05. MP: 9.5 shots per match, KäPa: 6.5.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. KäPa: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

MP: 0-15 (0 goals). KäPa: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 1.90 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win ('2'). KäPa have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game) versus MP’s 4 goals (0.8 per game). In away metrics KäPa average 8 shots and 5 shots on target with xG 1.14, while the hosts register 0 shots and 0 xG in home stats. KäPa also collect more points over the last 5 fixtures — 1.6 points per game versus MP’s 1.0 — and sit 5th in the table compared to the hosts’ 8th. Both teams concede: MP have conceded 5 goals in their last five matches (1.0 average), KäPa 8 goals (1.6 average), so KäPa’s edge comes primarily from better-quality chances and efficiency (9 vs 4 goals, conversion rate 25%). Based on this I assess result probabilities as: home 15%, draw 25%, away 60%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 100% (MP 100% and KäPa 100%), and in the last 5 matches the home side has 60% BTTS while the visitors have 100%, which is a strong signal that both sides will score. Season goals averages are 2.0 for MP and 2.0 for KäPa, with average goals conceded 2.0 (MP) versus 1.0 (KäPa); additionally both teams have 0% clean sheets, so a No Goal outcome is unlikely. xG metrics are similar: xG for attack 0.96 (MP) versus 1.14 (KäPa) and xG against 1.10 vs 0.99, and the last 5 matches show MP scored 4 and conceded 5 while KäPa scored 9 and conceded 8, confirming both teams’ ability to score and concede. Furthermore both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals and 100% of matches combining over2.5 with BTTS, therefore BTTS - Yes is clearly the more likely pick here.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 0.96 (MP) + 1.14 (KäPa) = 2.10, which translates to an expected ~0.98 goals for MP and 1.12 for KäPa (total 2.10). Both teams have had 100% of their season matches with over 1.5 goals and in 100% of fixtures goals have been scored by both sides, which strongly supports at least two goals in this match. KäPa averages 8 shots per game with 5 on target, MP has 5 shots with 2 on target, and MP’s high conversion rate of 40% (vs 25% KäPa) increases the likelihood of converting the existing chances. In the last 5 matches MP scored 4 goals (0.8 avg) and KäPa 9 goals (1.8 avg), while the league average goals is 2.11, very close to our xG of 2.10; this aligns the attacking signals and confirms choosing Over 1.5 as the strongest option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary signal comes from half-time form: in the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of cases, while the home team did so in 0%, and the average goals by half are 1.0 for the visitors versus 0.2 for the hosts (60.0 vs 0.0; 1.0 vs 0.2). Over the full match the visitors hold a clear advantage — average goals in the last 5 are 3.4 for the visitors against 1.8 for the hosts and 40% wins for visitors vs 20% for hosts (3.4 vs 1.8; 40.0% vs 20.0%). Chance-creation metrics also favor the visitors: xG 1.14 versus 0.96 (1.14 vs 0.96) and on average 8 shots with 5 on target for visitors versus 5 shots with 2 on target for hosts (8.0/5.0 vs 5.0/2.0). Despite the hosts having a higher conversion rate (conversion 40% vs 25%), the greater volume of visitors’ chances and higher season PPG (3.0 vs 1.0) argue for the visitors maintaining the advantage through 90 minutes. Therefore the most likely scenario is visitors leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
MPKäPa
10Shots9
MPKäPa
2Shots on target2
MPKäPa
1.28xG1.11
MPKäPa
3Corners3
MPKäPa
71Dangerous attacks56
MPKäPa
7Fouls8
MPKäPa
1Cards1
MPKäPa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match2
MPKäPa
1Goals conceded / match1.5
MPKäPa
49%Average possession47%
MPKäPa
4Shots on target / match3.5
MPKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match6.5
MPKäPa
4Shots on target3.5
MPKäPa
0%Shot conversion30.8%
MPKäPa
49%Possession47%
MPKäPa
1.26xG for1.05
MPKäPa
1.41xG against1.05
MPKäPa

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedKäPa: Counter-attacking
MPKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)42%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
KäPa
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MP is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - MP · 1.5 goals / match - KäPa

MP scoring profile: mixed

MP scores in 0% of matches (0 of 2 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: very strong

KäPa scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

0Goals scored (season)4
MPKäPa
2Goals conceded (season)3
MPKäPa
1Average goals in match3.5
MPKäPa
0Goals scored (last 5)4
MPKäPa
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
MPKäPa

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
MPKäPa
0%2 goals100%
MPKäPa
0%3 goals0%
MPKäPa
0%4 goals0%
MPKäPa

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
MPKäPa
0%2 goals50%
MPKäPa
0%3 goals0%
MPKäPa
0%4 goals0%
MPKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
MPKäPa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MPKäPa
0%Scored in both halves0%
MPKäPa

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MPKäPa
0%BTTS - last 5100%
MPKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MPKäPa

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MPKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MPKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 500% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - MP · 3 pts / match - KäPa

MP - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)3
MPKäPa
0Goals scored (1st half)2
MPKäPa
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
MPKäPa
0.5Average goals (1st half)2
MPKäPa
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
MPKäPa
100%No goal before half-time0%
MPKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)0
MPKäPa
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
MPKäPa
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
MPKäPa
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
MPKäPa
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
MPKäPa
100%No goal after half-time100%
MPKäPa

MP - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.50
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match0.50.5
1 goal50%50%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.00
Goals scored / match2.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.5
Average goals in match2.01.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.95
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
250%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-2.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 1.001.90 3.50
Both teams scored 0%40% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%40% 100%
Clean sheets 0%45% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%60% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%50% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.90
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / match
0.80
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KäPaGoalDenis Cukici
  2. KäPaYellow cardPekka Hietalahti
  3. MPYellow cardSerge Atakayi
  4. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Daniel RökmanOff: Antonio Almen
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Oliver HäyhänenOff: Niila Forsell

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:1 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs KäPa?

MP score 0.00 goals per game on average and KäPa 2.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of MP's matches and 100% of KäPa's.

What form are MP and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and KäPa 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs KäPa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.