MP vs KTP: match statistics
MP vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MP played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
MP scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MP 47%, KTP 40%. Over 2.5: MP 40%, KTP 40%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.23. MP: 9.9 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.
Match halves
MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53. KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.
Goals by minute
MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites in this match are the visitors, KTP: they sit 2nd in the table and have 10 wins this season compared to MP’s 5, and over the last 5 matches KTP have averaged 2 points per game versus MP’s 1. Offensively KTP are superior — 25 goals this season versus MP’s 14, and 14 goals in the last 5 matches versus the hosts’ 7; KTP’s away goals average is 1.29 vs MP’s 1.17 at home. Defensively the visitors also look better: they concede 0.86 goals on average away, while MP concede 1.17 at home, and the visitors’ clean sheet rate is 71% versus the hosts’ 33%. The quality of chances created is confirmed by xG and shot volume — KTP have xG 1.68, 15.57 shots and 4.29 on target per match, MP have xG 1.20, 10 shots and 3.17 on target; although MP have a higher conversion rate 12% vs 8%, KTP’s advantage in chance creation is clear. Considering better form (2 pts vs 1 pt in the last 5), the xG edge and stronger away defense, I assign KTP a 65% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis indicates a BTTS-favored scenario: combined xG for both teams is 1.85 + 1.68 = 3.53, suggesting a high likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches MP has BTTS at 100% and averages 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while KTP scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) and conceded 6 (1.2) in the same period, with KTP’s last 5 matches showing BTTS at 60%. A counter-signal is KTP’s season clean sheet rate of 71% and season BTTS share of only 29%, which theoretically favors No BTTS, but the visitors’ recent form significantly mitigates that. Additionally, MP averages 5.75 shots on target with a 13% conversion versus KTP’s 4.29 and 8%, and season goal averages of 2.0 for the home side and 1.29 for the away side increase MP’s chance to score. Considering the combined xG of 3.53 and strong signals from the last 5 matches (MP 100% BTTS, KTP 60% BTTS), the pick Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal) appears more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging offensive xG and xG against the opponent, I assess that MP has 1.53 expected goals ((1.85+1.21)/2), and KTP 1.38 ((1.68+1.07)/2), giving a total of 2.91 expected goals. With a total expected goals of 2.91, the probability of Over 1.5 is roughly 79%, Over 2.5 about 56%, and Over 3.5 around 33%. Match trends reinforce the signal: in the last 5 fixtures MP scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), KTP 14 goals (2.8 avg), and their recent xG are 1.18 and 1.70. A counterpoint is KTP’s high clean sheet rate — 71% of matches — and a low away both-teams-to-score rate (29%), which reduces the likelihood of BTTS; nevertheless MP averages 5.75 shots on target and has a 13% conversion rate, so there is a realistic chance of at least two goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: over 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~79%; Over 2.5 is an alternative at ~56%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2): the home side draw in 50% of matches at the break, while the visitors do so in 57%. After the break the visitors have clearly better final results — the season-long away win rate is 71% versus 63% for homes, and in the last 5 matches the visitors won 60% of games while the hosts only 20%. The average goals at half-time are 0.63 for the home team and 0.57 for the visitors, which increases the chance of an HT draw, whereas the average points per match favor the visitors (2.29 vs 2.0), so they can produce a turnaround after the break. Technically the hosts generate slightly more xG (1.85 vs 1.68) and have more shots on target (5.75 vs 4.29), but in the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 40% and scored 9 first-half goals versus 4 for the hosts, which supports the expectation that they will gain more after the interval. Therefore I select X/2 (28%) as the strongest signal; alternatively X/X (20%) and 2/2 (18%) are meaningful due to the high HT draw rates (50–57%) and the visitors’ good finishing efficiency (60–71%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MP | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - MP · 2 pts / match - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - MP · 1.67 goals / match - KTP
KTP is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.27 goals / match - MP · 1 goals / match - KTP
MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - KTP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - MP · 1.33 pts / match - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MP
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 61% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: MP 0 - 0 - 1 KTP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 3:3 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs KTP?
MP score 0.93 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 47% of MP's matches and 40% of KTP's.
What form are MP and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs KTP?
The statistical background for MP vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


