Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData current as of 06 September 2026

MP vs KTP: match statistics

MP crest
MP
3 : 3half-time 2:1
KTP crest
KTP

MP vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 47%, KTP 40%. Over 2.5: MP 40%, KTP 40%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.23. MP: 9.9 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53. KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.

Goals by minute

MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorites in this match are the visitors, KTP: they sit 2nd in the table and have 10 wins this season compared to MP’s 5, and over the last 5 matches KTP have averaged 2 points per game versus MP’s 1. Offensively KTP are superior — 25 goals this season versus MP’s 14, and 14 goals in the last 5 matches versus the hosts’ 7; KTP’s away goals average is 1.29 vs MP’s 1.17 at home. Defensively the visitors also look better: they concede 0.86 goals on average away, while MP concede 1.17 at home, and the visitors’ clean sheet rate is 71% versus the hosts’ 33%. The quality of chances created is confirmed by xG and shot volume — KTP have xG 1.68, 15.57 shots and 4.29 on target per match, MP have xG 1.20, 10 shots and 3.17 on target; although MP have a higher conversion rate 12% vs 8%, KTP’s advantage in chance creation is clear. Considering better form (2 pts vs 1 pt in the last 5), the xG edge and stronger away defense, I assign KTP a 65% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis indicates a BTTS-favored scenario: combined xG for both teams is 1.85 + 1.68 = 3.53, suggesting a high likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches MP has BTTS at 100% and averages 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while KTP scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) and conceded 6 (1.2) in the same period, with KTP’s last 5 matches showing BTTS at 60%. A counter-signal is KTP’s season clean sheet rate of 71% and season BTTS share of only 29%, which theoretically favors No BTTS, but the visitors’ recent form significantly mitigates that. Additionally, MP averages 5.75 shots on target with a 13% conversion versus KTP’s 4.29 and 8%, and season goal averages of 2.0 for the home side and 1.29 for the away side increase MP’s chance to score. Considering the combined xG of 3.53 and strong signals from the last 5 matches (MP 100% BTTS, KTP 60% BTTS), the pick Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal) appears more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Averaging offensive xG and xG against the opponent, I assess that MP has 1.53 expected goals ((1.85+1.21)/2), and KTP 1.38 ((1.68+1.07)/2), giving a total of 2.91 expected goals. With a total expected goals of 2.91, the probability of Over 1.5 is roughly 79%, Over 2.5 about 56%, and Over 3.5 around 33%. Match trends reinforce the signal: in the last 5 fixtures MP scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), KTP 14 goals (2.8 avg), and their recent xG are 1.18 and 1.70. A counterpoint is KTP’s high clean sheet rate — 71% of matches — and a low away both-teams-to-score rate (29%), which reduces the likelihood of BTTS; nevertheless MP averages 5.75 shots on target and has a 13% conversion rate, so there is a realistic chance of at least two goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: over 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~79%; Over 2.5 is an alternative at ~56%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2): the home side draw in 50% of matches at the break, while the visitors do so in 57%. After the break the visitors have clearly better final results — the season-long away win rate is 71% versus 63% for homes, and in the last 5 matches the visitors won 60% of games while the hosts only 20%. The average goals at half-time are 0.63 for the home team and 0.57 for the visitors, which increases the chance of an HT draw, whereas the average points per match favor the visitors (2.29 vs 2.0), so they can produce a turnaround after the break. Technically the hosts generate slightly more xG (1.85 vs 1.68) and have more shots on target (5.75 vs 4.29), but in the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 40% and scored 9 first-half goals versus 4 for the hosts, which supports the expectation that they will gain more after the interval. Therefore I select X/2 (28%) as the strongest signal; alternatively X/X (20%) and 2/2 (18%) are meaningful due to the high HT draw rates (50–57%) and the visitors’ good finishing efficiency (60–71%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
MPKTP
18Shots14
MPKTP
5Shots on target7
MPKTP
1.87xG1.77
MPKTP
7Corners12
MPKTP
55Dangerous attacks56
MPKTP
7Fouls3
MPKTP
1Cards2
MPKTP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.93Goals scored / match1.67
MPKTP
1.27Goals conceded / match1
MPKTP
48%Average possession51%
MPKTP
3.73Shots on target / match5.07
MPKTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.93Shots per match15.27
MPKTP
3.73Shots on target5.07
MPKTP
9.4%Shot conversion10.9%
MPKTP
48%Possession51%
MPKTP
1.23xG for1.77
MPKTP
1.5xG against1.13
MPKTP

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedKTP: Attacking
MPKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - MP · 2 pts / match - KTP

MP
DLWDL
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
KTP
WWDWL
Season result split
67% W13% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-3
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - MP · 1.67 goals / match - KTP

KTP is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - MP · 1 goals / match - KTP

MP scoring profile: strong

MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

14Goals scored (season)25
MPKTP
19Goals conceded (season)15
MPKTP
2.2Average goals in match2.67
MPKTP
7Goals scored (last 5)14
MPKTP
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
MPKTP

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal80%
MPKTP
20%2 goals47%
MPKTP
0%3 goals20%
MPKTP
0%4 goals13%
MPKTP

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal53%
MPKTP
33%2 goals20%
MPKTP
20%3 goals13%
MPKTP
0%4 goals7%
MPKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time27%
MPKTP
0%BTTS in both halves13%
MPKTP
7%Scored in both halves33%
MPKTP

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
MPKTP
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MPKTP
100%BTTS - last 560%
MPKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
MPKTP
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
MPKTP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
MPKTP

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
MPKTP
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
MPKTP
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
MPKTP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - MP · 1.33 pts / match - KTP

MP - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing
KTP - half-time state
27% leading53% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.33
MPKTP
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
MPKTP
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
MPKTP
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.13
MPKTP
73%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MPKTP
60%No goal before half-time53%
MPKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per match (2nd half)1.87
MPKTP
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
MPKTP
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
MPKTP
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.53
MPKTP
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
MPKTP
60%No goal after half-time33%
MPKTP

MP - second-half results

13% W47% R40% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - second-half results

53% W27% R20% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding248%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KTP
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
8
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaKTP
Average goals in match 2.202.49 2.67
Both teams scored 47%45% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%45% 40%
Clean sheets 27%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 60%61% 60%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPRed cardNathaniel Tahmbi
  2. MPYellow cardRohun Kawale
  3. MPSubstitutionOn: Eero YlönenOff: Akseli Tervaniemi
  4. MPSubstitutionOn: Santeri SteniusOff: Rohun Kawale
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Miko KoivuniemiOff: Milot Kastrati
  6. KTPSubstitutionOn: Gift Okarigbedi SundayOff: Foday Manneh
  7. MPSubstitutionOn: Santtu SeppänenOff: Serge Atakayi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: MP 0 - 0 - 1 KTP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 3:3 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs KTP?

MP score 0.93 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 47% of MP's matches and 40% of KTP's.

What form are MP and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs KTP?

The statistical background for MP vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.