Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo: match statistics

Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Namungo crest
Namungo
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Mtibwa Sugar boasts impressive home form with an 83% win rate at home and a streak of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. The hosts are unbeaten in home matches this season, keeping clean sheets in half of their games and conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Namungo displays poor away efficiency with just a 20% win rate and 40% losses, scoring an average of only 0.6 goals per away match. Mtibwa Sugar's positive goal difference (+6) in home matches contrasts with Namungo's negative goal difference (-3) on the road. Despite Namungo's good recent overall form (2.6 points per match), their evident struggles in away fixtures and the hosts' dominance on home turf argue in favor of a Mtibwa Sugar victory.

Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mtibwa Sugar played Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mtibwa Sugar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Namungo: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 0.58 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.91 and concedes 0.73. League average: 1.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mtibwa Sugar 33%, Namungo 36%. Over 2.5: Mtibwa Sugar 25%, Namungo 9%. League level: BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 25%.

xG, shots and style

Namungo has higher xG: 1.07 vs 0.99. Mtibwa Sugar: 3.8 shots per match, Namungo: 6.4.

Match halves

Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.42. Namungo: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (3 goals). Namungo: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.75 goals per match, BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 25%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mtibwa Sugar boasts impressive home form with an 83% win rate at home and a streak of five consecutive victories at their own stadium. The hosts are unbeaten in home matches this season, keeping clean sheets in half of their games and conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Namungo displays poor away efficiency with just a 20% win rate and 40% losses, scoring an average of only 0.6 goals per away match. Mtibwa Sugar's positive goal difference (+6) in home matches contrasts with Namungo's negative goal difference (-3) on the road. Despite Namungo's good recent overall form (2.6 points per match), their evident struggles in away fixtures and the hosts' dominance on home turf argue in favor of a Mtibwa Sugar victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
8Shots6
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
2Shots on target4
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.13xG1.18
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1Corners3
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
66Dangerous attacks70
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
-1Fouls-1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
-1Cards-1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.83Goals scored / match0.91
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.58Goals conceded / match0.73
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
34%Average possession42%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.67Shots on target / match2
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.83Shots per match6.36
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.67Shots on target2
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
21.7%Shot conversion14.3%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
34%Possession42%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.99xG for1.07
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.51xG against1.18
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Shooting quality

Mtibwa Sugar: Counter-attackingNamungo: Counter-attacking
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)44%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Namungo is 18% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 2.6 pts / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W42% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Namungo
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W36% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-2
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Namungo is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.91 goals / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.58 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.73 goals / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: mixed

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: strong

Namungo scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

10Goals scored (season)10
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
7Goals conceded (season)8
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
1.42Average goals in match1.64
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal82%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
33%2 goals9%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%3 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%4 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal55%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
8%2 goals9%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%3 goals9%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%4 goals0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

27%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
25%Scored in both halves0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
60%BTTS - last 520%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Namungo is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar · 0.91 pts / match - Namungo

Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)0.91
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.18
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.75Average goals (1st half)0.64
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
50%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
75%No goal before half-time82%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)2.09
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
92%Clean sheet after half-time82%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo
58%No goal after half-time36%
Mtibwa SugarNamungo

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

42% W50% R8% P
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - second-half results

64% W18% R18% P
10
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
4
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Mtibwa SugarLigaNamungo
Average goals in match 1.421.75 1.64
Both teams scored 33%27% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%25% 9%
Clean sheets 50%44% 45%
Goal before half-time 50%47% 64%
Goal after half-time 50%55% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.75
Average goals per match
27%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.57
Away goals / match
+107%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
47%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mtibwa Sugar 1:1 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

Mtibwa Sugar score 0.83 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.91. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Mtibwa Sugar's matches and 36% of Namungo's.

What form are Mtibwa Sugar and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games Mtibwa Sugar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Namungo 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mtibwa Sugar vs Namungo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.