Hungary - NB IData current as of 23 July 2026

MTK vs Puskás: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Puskás crest
Puskás
135%(2.80)
X30%(3.40)
235%(2.13)

Statistical analysis points to balanced chances for both sides in this fixture. MTK displays strong home attacking output with an average of 2.7 goals per game, yet their defense is problematic, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per home match. Puskás shows solidity in away games with a 50% win rate and a better defensive record (1.1 goals conceded per away match). The form of both teams in their last five matches is inconsistent, with a slight advantage for Puskás (1.2 points per game compared to MTK's 0.8). Considering the balanced xG statistics, their similar league positions, and the head-to-head record between these sides, a draw or a narrow victory for either team appears the most likely outcome. The high average goals in MTK's home matches (4.6) suggests an entertaining encounter with goals at both ends.

MTK vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MTK play Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The match date is 14 February 2026 at 14:45. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

MTK: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Puskás: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

MTK scores 1.67 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. Puskás scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MTK 67%, Puskás 64%. Over 2.5: MTK 70%, Puskás 52%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.55. MTK: 13.4 shots per match, Puskás: 13.1.

Match halves

MTK: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.09. Puskás: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

MTK: 76-90+ (14 goals). Puskás: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to balanced chances for both sides in this fixture. MTK displays strong home attacking output with an average of 2.7 goals per game, yet their defense is problematic, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per home match. Puskás shows solidity in away games with a 50% win rate and a better defensive record (1.1 goals conceded per away match). The form of both teams in their last five matches is inconsistent, with a slight advantage for Puskás (1.2 points per game compared to MTK's 0.8). Considering the balanced xG statistics, their similar league positions, and the head-to-head record between these sides, a draw or a narrow victory for either team appears the most likely outcome. The high average goals in MTK's home matches (4.6) suggests an entertaining encounter with goals at both ends.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
MTKPuskás
14Shots8
MTKPuskás
6Shots on target3
MTKPuskás
1.75xG1.02
MTKPuskás
3Corners1
MTKPuskás
61Dangerous attacks41
MTKPuskás
9Fouls21
MTKPuskás
5Cards5
MTKPuskás

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match1.3
MTKPuskás
1.88Goals conceded / match1.3
MTKPuskás
50%Average possession46%
MTKPuskás
4.94Shots on target / match4.39
MTKPuskás

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.42Shots per match13.06
MTKPuskás
4.94Shots on target4.39
MTKPuskás
12.4%Shot conversion10%
MTKPuskás
50%Possession46%
MTKPuskás
1.56xG for1.55
MTKPuskás
1.81xG against1.49
MTKPuskás

Shooting quality

MTK: BalancedPuskás: Balanced
MTKPuskás
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MTK is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - MTK · 1.4 pts / match - Puskás

MTK
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-13
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Puskás
LLWWD
Season result split
39% W21% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-13
1.39 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - MTK · 1.3 goals / match - Puskás

Puskás is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.88 goals / match - MTK · 1.3 goals / match - Puskás

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 33 matches).

Puskás scoring profile: very strong

Puskás scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 33 matches).

55Goals scored (season)43
MTKPuskás
62Goals conceded (season)43
MTKPuskás
3.55Average goals in match2.61
MTKPuskás
8Goals scored (last 5)8
MTKPuskás
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
MTKPuskás

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal82%
MTKPuskás
48%2 goals39%
MTKPuskás
21%3 goals9%
MTKPuskás
9%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal79%
MTKPuskás
52%2 goals39%
MTKPuskás
33%3 goals9%
MTKPuskás
15%4 goals3%
MTKPuskás

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time30%
MTKPuskás
12%BTTS in both halves3%
MTKPuskás
27%Scored in both halves24%
MTKPuskás

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
MTKPuskás
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
60%BTTS - last 560%
MTKPuskás

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
MTKPuskás
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
MTKPuskás
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
MTKPuskás

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MTKPuskás
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
MTKPuskás
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MTKPuskás

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Puskás is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - MTK · 1.03 pts / match - Puskás

MTK - half-time state
21% leading33% draw45% trailing
Puskás - half-time state
21% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.03
MTKPuskás
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.58
MTKPuskás
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
MTKPuskás
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.3
MTKPuskás
39%Clean sheet before half-time39%
MTKPuskás
64%No goal before half-time52%
MTKPuskás

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.52
MTKPuskás
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
MTKPuskás
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
MTKPuskás
2.12Average goals (2nd half)1.3
MTKPuskás
42%Clean sheet after half-time64%
MTKPuskás
27%No goal after half-time42%
MTKPuskás

MTK - second-half results

42% W21% R36% P
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Puskás - second-half results

39% W33% R27% P
34
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Puskás - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
12
31-45
12
6
46-60
10
9
61-75
14
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Puskás
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
9
8
16-30
5
10
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
3
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Puskás

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPuskás
Average goals in match 3.553.00 2.61
Both teams scored 67%60% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%60% 52%
Clean sheets 21%22% 21%
Goal before half-time 76%70% 79%
Goal after half-time 94%87% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MTK 0 - 2 - 0 Puskás. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Puskás Ferenc Akadémia FC
2 : 2
MTK Budapest FC
Puskás Ferenc Akadémia FC
1 : 1
MTK Budapest FC

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Puskás?

The NB I match finished MTK 2:2 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Puskás?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, Puskás won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Puskás?

MTK score 1.67 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.30. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of MTK's matches and 64% of Puskás's.

What form are MTK and Puskás in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Puskás 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Puskás?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.