Hungary - NB IData current as of 06 September 2026

MTK vs Puskás: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Puskás crest
Puskás
135%(2.80)
X30%(3.40)
235%(2.13)

Statistical analysis points to balanced chances for both sides in this fixture. MTK displays strong home attacking output with an average of 2.7 goals per game, yet their defense is problematic, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per home match. Puskás shows solidity in away games with a 50% win rate and a better defensive record (1.1 goals conceded per away match). The form of both teams in their last five matches is inconsistent, with a slight advantage for Puskás (1.2 points per game compared to MTK's 0.8). Considering the balanced xG statistics, their similar league positions, and the head-to-head record between these sides, a draw or a narrow victory for either team appears the most likely outcome. The high average goals in MTK's home matches (4.6) suggests an entertaining encounter with goals at both ends.

MTK vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MTK played Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

MTK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Puskás: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

MTK scores 1.86 and concedes 2.19 goals per match. Puskás scores 1.24 and concedes 1.24. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MTK 67%, Puskás 62%. Over 2.5: MTK 76%, Puskás 48%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.58. MTK: 13.7 shots per match, Puskás: 13.4.

Match halves

MTK: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.05. Puskás: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

MTK: 46-60 (8 goals). Puskás: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to balanced chances for both sides in this fixture. MTK displays strong home attacking output with an average of 2.7 goals per game, yet their defense is problematic, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per home match. Puskás shows solidity in away games with a 50% win rate and a better defensive record (1.1 goals conceded per away match). The form of both teams in their last five matches is inconsistent, with a slight advantage for Puskás (1.2 points per game compared to MTK's 0.8). Considering the balanced xG statistics, their similar league positions, and the head-to-head record between these sides, a draw or a narrow victory for either team appears the most likely outcome. The high average goals in MTK's home matches (4.6) suggests an entertaining encounter with goals at both ends.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
MTKPuskás
14Shots8
MTKPuskás
6Shots on target3
MTKPuskás
1.75xG1.02
MTKPuskás
3Corners1
MTKPuskás
61Dangerous attacks41
MTKPuskás
9Fouls21
MTKPuskás
5Cards5
MTKPuskás

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.86Goals scored / match1.24
MTKPuskás
2.19Goals conceded / match1.24
MTKPuskás
50%Average possession46%
MTKPuskás
5.05Shots on target / match4.38
MTKPuskás

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.71Shots per match13.38
MTKPuskás
5.05Shots on target4.38
MTKPuskás
13.5%Shot conversion9.3%
MTKPuskás
50%Possession46%
MTKPuskás
1.59xG for1.58
MTKPuskás
1.94xG against1.52
MTKPuskás

Shooting quality

MTK: Efficient finishingPuskás: Balanced
MTKPuskás
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Puskás is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - MTK · 1.2 pts / match - Puskás

MTK
LDWLL
Season result split
33% W14% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-11
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Puskás
WLLWL
Season result split
43% W19% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-8
1.48 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.86 goals / match - MTK · 1.24 goals / match - Puskás

Puskás is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.19 goals / match - MTK · 1.24 goals / match - Puskás

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

Puskás scoring profile: very strong

Puskás scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

39Goals scored (season)26
MTKPuskás
46Goals conceded (season)26
MTKPuskás
4.05Average goals in match2.48
MTKPuskás
10Goals scored (last 5)4
MTKPuskás
14Goals conceded (last 5)6
MTKPuskás

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal81%
MTKPuskás
48%2 goals33%
MTKPuskás
29%3 goals10%
MTKPuskás
14%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal76%
MTKPuskás
52%2 goals38%
MTKPuskás
48%3 goals10%
MTKPuskás
24%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time33%
MTKPuskás
14%BTTS in both halves5%
MTKPuskás
33%Scored in both halves29%
MTKPuskás

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
MTKPuskás
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
100%BTTS - last 540%
MTKPuskás

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
MTKPuskás
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
MTKPuskás
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
MTKPuskás

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
MTKPuskás
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
MTKPuskás
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
MTKPuskás

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MTK is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - MTK · 0.95 pts / match - Puskás

MTK - half-time state
29% leading19% draw52% trailing
Puskás - half-time state
14% leading52% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)0.95
MTKPuskás
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.48
MTKPuskás
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
MTKPuskás
1.86Average goals (1st half)1.19
MTKPuskás
29%Clean sheet before half-time43%
MTKPuskás
52%No goal before half-time52%
MTKPuskás

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.62
MTKPuskás
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
MTKPuskás
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
MTKPuskás
2.19Average goals (2nd half)1.29
MTKPuskás
43%Clean sheet after half-time62%
MTKPuskás
29%No goal after half-time38%
MTKPuskás

MTK - second-half results

52% W0% R48% P
22
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Puskás - second-half results

48% W19% R33% P
20
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.22.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6
Puskás - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
10
16-30
7
8
31-45
8
4
46-60
7
7
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Puskás
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
7
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Puskás

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPuskás
Average goals in match 4.053.00 2.48
Both teams scored 67%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%58% 48%
Clean sheets 19%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 90%68% 71%
Goal after half-time 100%89% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PuskásGoalZsolt Nagy
  2. MTKYellow cardMihály Kata
  3. MTKYellow cardBenedek Varju
  4. PuskásGoalZsolt Nagy
  5. PuskásYellow cardMikael Soisalo
  6. PuskásYellow cardMagyar Zsolt János
  7. MTKYellow cardTamás Kádár
  8. PuskásYellow cardLaros Duarte
  9. MTKYellow cardHunor Vajk Németh
  10. MTKSubstitutionOn: Marin JurinaOff: Róbert Polievka
  11. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Pal DardaiOff: Mikael Soisalo
  12. PuskásYellow cardRoland Szolnoki
  13. PuskásYellow cardÁkos Markgráf
  14. MTKYellow cardIstván Bognár

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Márton RúszMatches officiated: 10
5.4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 240%Home wins40%Draws20%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: MTK 0 - 1 - 0 Puskás. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Puskás Ferenc Akadémia FC
1 : 1
MTK Budapest FC

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Puskás?

The NB I match finished MTK 2:2 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Puskás?

MTK score 1.86 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.24. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of MTK's matches and 62% of Puskás's.

What form are MTK and Puskás in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Puskás 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Puskás?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.