Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman: match statistics
Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Muhanga played Al Hilal Omdurman in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Muhanga: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Al Hilal Omdurman: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Muhanga scores 0.67 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Al Hilal Omdurman scores 2.30 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Muhanga 33%, Al Hilal Omdurman 43%. Over 2.5: Muhanga 37%, Al Hilal Omdurman 57%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Al Hilal Omdurman has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.00. Muhanga: 5.6 shots per match, Al Hilal Omdurman: 7.9.
Match halves
Muhanga: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.23. Al Hilal Omdurman: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30.
Goals by minute
Muhanga: 16-30 (6 goals). Al Hilal Omdurman: 61-75 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National Soccer League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win for Al Hilal Omdurman — estimated probabilities: Al Hilal 72%, draw 18%, Muhanga 10%. The main advantage for Al Hilal is their offense: on the road they average 2.08 goals per match, 9.46 shots per game with 4.08 on target, while Muhanga at home averages 0.81 goals from 5.87 shots and 1.8 shots on target. Quality of chances is supported by xG — Al Hilal’s away xG is 1.39 versus Muhanga’s home xG of 0.96, and the visitors have 0% matches without scoring compared to 38% for Muhanga. Defensively Al Hilal is also superior: they concede 0.77 goals on average away and keep 46% clean sheets, whereas Muhanga concedes 1.00 goals at home and has 31% clean sheets; season totals are 67 goals scored and 20 conceded for the visitors versus 20 scored and 39 conceded for the hosts. Form further favors the visitors — Al Hilal have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that period, while Muhanga have 2 wins and 3 goals in their last 5, reinforcing the prediction of an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 38% for Muhanga and 54% for Al Hilal against a league average of 43%, producing a mixed signal but with form advantage to the visitors. In the last 5 matches Muhanga scored 3 goals (0.6 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0 per match), while Al Hilal scored 11 goals (2.2 per match) and conceded 2 (0.4 per match). Muhanga has a seasonal clean sheet rate of 63%, and the league records 71% of matches with a clean sheet, which reduces the likelihood of BTTS in this fixture. Seasonal xG are similar (1.37 vs 1.39), but over the last 5 matches Al Hilal’s xG is 1.61 versus Muhanga’s 0.81, and shot conversion of 31% versus 22% will not be offset by the home side’s weaker form. Therefore I forecast No BTTS as more likely and rate 'No' at 65% versus 35% for 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: Muhanga 88% and Al Hilal 92%, with average goals of 2.5 (Muhanga) and 2.08 (Al Hilal), which strongly supports Over 1.5. Home xG is 1.37 and away xG 1.39, while xG against is 0.74 (Muhanga) and 0.91 (Al Hilal); averaging these values yields expected goals of about 1.14 for the home side and 1.07 for the visitors (total ≈2.21), so the 2.5 line is moderately risky. Form over the last 5 matches boosts the visitors’ offense — Al Hilal have 11 goals in 5 games (2.2 avg) while Muhanga have 3 goals in 5 (0.6 avg), increasing the likelihood of at least two goals in the match. Although Muhanga have 63% clean sheets at home, the strong seasonal propensity to score multiple goals (e.g. >1.5 in 88% of matches) and both teams’ shooting activity make Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the best line; Over 2.5 I assess as moderately likely (60%), and Over 3.5 as unlikely (31%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal indicates an away team lead at the break and an away win at full-time (2/2): in the last 5 matches Al Hilal led at half-time in 3 of 5 games (60%) and won 4 of 5 (80%), whereas Muhanga led at the break only once in the last 5 (20%) and has a 40% win rate. Average xG are essentially equal (1.37 for Muhanga vs 1.39 for Al Hilal), but in the last 5 matches the visitors score an average of 1.2 goals by half-time vs 0.4 for the hosts, which suggests an Al Hilal advantage in the first half. Additionally, season win percentage is 77% for the visitors vs 69% for the hosts, so form advantage favors Al Hilal. On the other hand Muhanga have a higher shot conversion rate (31% vs 22%) and strong second-half figures (hosts score on average 1.5 goals after the break vs 1.15 for the visitors), so comeback or draw turnaround scenarios for the hosts still have a significant share. In summary, given a 60% rate of away leads at half-time and 80% away wins in the last 5 matches, the 2/2 HT/FT option appears most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Muhanga | Al Hilal Omdurman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.63 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Hilal Omdurman is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Muhanga · 2.6 pts / match - Al Hilal Omdurman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hilal Omdurman is 243% better for: goals scored per match.
0.67 goals / match - Muhanga · 2.3 goals / match - Al Hilal Omdurman
Al Hilal Omdurman is 94% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Muhanga · 0.67 goals / match - Al Hilal Omdurman
Muhanga scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Al Hilal Omdurman keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 matches).
Al Hilal Omdurman scores in 97% of matches (29 of 30 matches), while Muhanga keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Muhanga
Over / Under - Al Hilal Omdurman
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hilal Omdurman is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Muhanga · 1.97 pts / match - Al Hilal Omdurman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Muhanga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Hilal Omdurman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Muhanga
Al Hilal Omdurman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Muhanga | Liga | Al Hilal Omdurman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.97 | 2.06 | ▲ 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 44% | • 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 37% | 36% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 35% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 60% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 69% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al Hilal OmdurmanGoalJean Claude Girumugisha
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Muhanga 0 - 0 - 1 Al Hilal Omdurman. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman?
The National Soccer League match finished Muhanga 0:2 Al Hilal Omdurman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman?
Muhanga score 0.67 goals per game on average and Al Hilal Omdurman 2.30. The National Soccer League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Muhanga's matches and 43% of Al Hilal Omdurman's.
What form are Muhanga and Al Hilal Omdurman in?
Over the last 5 games Muhanga have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Hilal Omdurman 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman?
The statistical background for Muhanga vs Al Hilal Omdurman — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


