Mukura vs Al Merreikh: match statistics
Mukura vs Al Merreikh: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mukura played Al Merreikh in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Mukura: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Al Merreikh: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mukura scores 1.08 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Al Merreikh scores 1.12 and concedes 0.56. League average: 2.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mukura 58%, Al Merreikh 40%. Over 2.5: Mukura 31%, Al Merreikh 24%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Al Merreikh has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.07. Mukura: 5.5 shots per match, Al Merreikh: 7.8.
Match halves
Mukura: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Merreikh: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Mukura: 61-75 (9 goals). Al Merreikh: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National Soccer League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite in this match is Al Merreikh (pick 2) due to superior season numbers and form: the visitors have 13 wins and only 2 losses, while Mukura have 10 wins and 8 losses. Although both teams have scored 28 goals this season, the difference is in defense — Al Merreikh concede only 0.38 goals on average away and have a 62% clean sheet rate, while Mukura concede 0.7 goals at home and have a 50% clean sheet rate. In attack the hosts look better in conversion: Mukura score 1.3 goals per home game with xG 1.05 and a 22% conversion rate, whereas Al Merreikh away average only 0.92 goals with xG 1.12 and an 11% conversion. Form confirms the visitors' edge — Al Merreikh accumulate 1.8 points in the last 5 matches, Mukura 1.4, and the visitors differentiate results with fewer losses (2 vs 8). Considering the visitors’ solid defense and greater consistency, I assign a 45% probability to an Al Merreikh win, 30% to a draw and 25% to a Mukura win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Al Merreikh demonstrates a clear defensive advantage: away clean sheet rate is 62%, they concede on average 0.38 goals away this season, and in the last 5 matches they conceded a total of 1 goal (0.2 average). Mukura, however, conceded on average 1.4 goals in their last five matches, but at home they have xG 1.45, an average goals scored of 1.33 and 4.27 shots on target per game, which provides a real chance for the home side to score. Season-long BTTS percentages diverge: Mukura has 50% of matches with both teams scoring, Al Merreikh 31%, while the league BTTS level is 45% with as many as 68% of matches ending with a clean sheet for one of the teams. Despite Mukura’s superior chance creation (xG 1.45 versus Al Merreikh’s xG against 0.99), the visitors’ dominant defensive efficiency on the road (62% CS and 0.2 conceded in the last 5) leads me to a higher probability of No Goal/No BTTS. Therefore I propose a split of 60% for 'no' and 40% for 'yes', recommending the 'no' (No BTTS) bet as the more statistically justified option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics, I expect a moderately open game: I calculated expected goals for Mukura as the average of home xG 1.45 and xG against away 0.99 = 1.22, and for Al Merreikh as the average of away xG 1.12 and xG against home 1.13 = 1.13, giving a total of 2.35 goals. The 2.35 total exceeds the league average 2.06 and, using a Poisson distribution, implies roughly a 68% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), hence a strong signal for Over 1.5. Conversely, the visitors’ defense is solid: Al Merreikh concedes 0.38 goals per match and has 62% clean sheets, while Mukura concedes 0.75 and has 42% clean sheets, which limits the likelihood of very high scores (seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 33% for hosts and 15% for visitors; Over 3.5 is 17% vs 0%). In the last 5 matches Mukura scored 7 and conceded 7 (avg 1.4 and 1.4), while Al Merreikh scored 5 and conceded 1 (avg 1.0 and 0.2), confirming the visitors’ defensive stability. Summary: I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (≈68%); Over 2.5 (~42%) and Over 3.5 (~21%) are less likely and are not the primary picks.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a draw at Half-Time because Al Merreikh were level at the break in 77% of matches and kept a clean sheet at Half-Time in 92% of games, while Mukura average 0.58 goals by Half-Time versus 0.31 for their opponents — this points to a low number of goals before the interval. For Full-Time the strongest signal is again a draw: Mukura draw 42% of their matches this season, Al Merreikh 38%, and xG is 1.45 (Mukura) versus 1.12 (Al Merreikh), which does not indicate a clear dominator. Mukura do, however, have the edge in second halves over their last five matches — averaging 1.8 goals in second halves versus 0.8 for Al Merreikh — so scenarios where the home side improves their result after the break are realistic. Conversely, Al Merreikh concede only 0.38 goals per game across the season and have 62% clean sheets, which limits the risk of a heavy defeat and reinforces the draw as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mukura | Al Merreikh | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.62 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Merreikh is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Mukura · 1.8 pts / match - Al Merreikh
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Merreikh is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Mukura · 0.56 goals / match - Al Merreikh
Mukura scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Al Merreikh keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).
Al Merreikh scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Mukura keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mukura
Over / Under - Al Merreikh
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Merreikh is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Mukura · 1.52 pts / match - Al Merreikh
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mukura - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Merreikh - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mukura
Al Merreikh
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Mukura | Liga | Al Merreikh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.12 | 2.06 | ▼ 1.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 35% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 31% | 34% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 69% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mukura 0 - 1 - 0 Al Merreikh. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mukura vs Al Merreikh?
The National Soccer League match finished Mukura 1:0 Al Merreikh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mukura vs Al Merreikh?
Mukura score 1.08 goals per game on average and Al Merreikh 1.12. The National Soccer League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Mukura's matches and 40% of Al Merreikh's.
What form are Mukura and Al Merreikh in?
Over the last 5 games Mukura have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Merreikh 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mukura vs Al Merreikh?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


