Municipal Limeño vs FAS: match statistics
Municipal Limeño vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Municipal Limeño played FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Municipal Limeño: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. FAS: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Municipal Limeño scores 1.38 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. FAS scores 2.12 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Municipal Limeño 54%, FAS 55%. Over 2.5: Municipal Limeño 46%, FAS 53%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
FAS has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.44. Municipal Limeño: 9.7 shots per match, FAS: 11.0.
Match halves
Municipal Limeño: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.85. FAS: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.16.
Goals by minute
Municipal Limeño: 76-90+ (19 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win (2) because FAS exhibits a clear offensive edge and superior form: 104 goals scored this season versus Municipal Limeño’s 66, and an average of 2.00 goals away compared to the home side’s 1.63. The visitors convert chances more efficiently — FAS away conversion is 20% with an average xG of 1.49, while Municipal’s home conversion is 15% with xG 1.62, indicating FAS finishes similar chances better. In the last 5 matches FAS have scored 7, conceded 3 and recorded 2 wins and 3 draws, averaging 1.8 points per game; Municipal’s last 5 show 6 scored, 7 conceded and a record of 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per game). The home defence looks solid — 1.00 goals conceded on average and 42% clean sheets at home — but season figures for FAS (104 scored, 47 conceded) and their higher efficiency lead me to favour the visitors, hence the probability split: 60% FAS, 20% draw, 20% Municipal.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for Municipal and 60% for FAS (average 55%), and the league BTTS rate is 54%, providing initial support for the “both teams to score” option. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS at 60%: Municipal scored 6 and conceded 7 in those five, while FAS scored 7 and conceded only 3, indicating FAS has been conceding less recently. Offensively FAS has 104 goals this season and averages 2.0 goals away, while Municipal averages 2.25 goals at home and xG_for 1.58 versus FAS xG_for 1.49, so both teams generate goal-scoring chances. A counterpoint is Municipal’s high clean sheet expected at home 46% and low average goals conceded at home 0.71, which reduces BTTS probability, but considering seasonal and recent trends (average 55% and 60% in last 5) I recommend the ‘Yes’ scenario. Based on the above figures I assign 62% to BTTS=YES and 38% to BTTS=NO.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data indicate high goal potential: Municipal Limeño averages 2.25 goals at home, FAS 2.00 away, and xG is 1.58 for Limeño and 1.49 for FAS (total xG = 3.07), providing a base of about 3.07 expected goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 — 79% of Limeño’s home matches and 92% of FAS’s away matches finished above 1.5 goals, so I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at ~88%. For the 2.5 line the situation is more balanced: Limeño has Over 2.5 in 63% of games, FAS in 44%, but the combined xG of 3.07 and average shots 12.33/10.21 with conversion rates 18%/20% give a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (approx. 60%). The 3.5 line is less likely — Over 3.5 occurred in 42% of Limeño’s matches and 36% of FAS’s, and the total xG is below 3.5, so I estimate Over 3.5 at about 35% (Under 65%). I conclude the strongest and safest play is Over 1.5 (over, line 1.5) due to clear historical Over 1.5 shares corroborated by xG and shot numbers.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side have a strong first-half edge — they led at the break in 14 matches (58%), scoring an average of 1.13 goals by half-time versus 0.79 for their opponents and conceding only 0.25 per half compared to the visitors’ 0.63. Over the full match Municipal Limeño win 79% of games and average 2.50 points per season versus the visitors’ 1.72, and they also have higher xG (1.58 vs 1.49) and lower xG conceded (1.08 vs 1.33), all supporting maintaining the advantage. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario — 46% (derived from the 58% chance to lead at the break and assuming roughly an 80% conversion of half-time leads into home wins). HT draws occur in 38% of matches, hence X/1 and X/X each received 15% shares, while X/2 was given 8% as a realistic alternative; I also factored in the visitors’ short-term form (last 5 matches: visitors 40% wins vs home 20%), which explains the small allocations for turnarounds (2/2 = 2%, 2/1 = 1%, 2/X = 1%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Municipal Limeño | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAS is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Municipal Limeño · 1.8 pts / match - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 54% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Municipal Limeño · 2.12 goals / match - FAS
FAS is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Municipal Limeño · 0.96 goals / match - FAS
Municipal Limeño scores in 79% of matches (38 of 48 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 37% (18 of 49 matches).
FAS scores in 90% of matches (44 of 49 matches), while Municipal Limeño keeps a clean sheet in 31% (15 of 48 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Municipal Limeño
Over / Under - FAS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Municipal Limeño · 1.69 pts / match - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Municipal Limeño - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Municipal Limeño
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Municipal Limeño | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 2.68 | ▲ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 54% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 68% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Municipal Limeño 0 - 1 - 3 FAS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Municipal Limeño vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Municipal Limeño 1:0 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Municipal Limeño and FAS?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Municipal Limeño won 0, FAS won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Municipal Limeño vs FAS?
Municipal Limeño score 1.38 goals per game on average and FAS 2.12. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Municipal Limeño's matches and 55% of FAS's.
What form are Municipal Limeño and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Municipal Limeño have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and FAS 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Municipal Limeño vs FAS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Municipal Limeño vs FAS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


