Romania - Liga IIData current as of 08 September 2026

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: match statistics

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite played Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite scores 0.46 and concedes 2.67 goals per match. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores 0.88 and concedes 2.08. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Muscelul Câmpulung Elite 25%, Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 42%. Over 2.5: Muscelul Câmpulung Elite 58%, Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 58%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.10. Muscelul Câmpulung Elite: 9.1 shots per match, Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: 10.2.

Match halves

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.38. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite: 46-60 (3 goals). Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams are in very poor form, so I predict a draw: the hosts have lost all of their last 5 matches (0 points) and conceded as many as 20 goals in those five fixtures, while the visitors have taken only 1 point in their last 5 matches (PPG 0.2) and conceded 11 goals. In favor of the hosts are their home metrics — average xG at home is 1.34 versus the visitors’ 1.11 xG away, average shots on target 4.18 vs 2.46 and possession 49% vs 42%. Despite this, the hosts have only 11 goals in the season (3 in the last 5) and fail to score in 55% of home matches, whereas Ceahlăul has 21 goals in the season and a lower share of matches without a goal (46%), indicating low finishing efficiency on both sides. Considering the marginal home advantage in chance creation but their recent defensive collapse (20 conceded in 5 matches), the most likely outcome appears to be a low-scoring or goalless draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The "BTTS - Yes" scenario appears more likely because both teams concede frequently: season averages of 2.00 (Muscelul) and 2.15 (Ceahlăul), and in the last 5 matches the home side conceded on average 4.0 goals while the visitors conceded 2.2. Although season BTTS rates are moderate (45% for hosts and 38% for guests), both teams have 60% of matches with BTTS in their last 5 fixtures, indicating a recent uptick in both teams scoring. Offensively the hosts look stronger — 1.18 goals and xG 1.35 vs 0.62 goals and xG 1.11 for the visitors; the home team averages 11.27 shots with 4.18 on target and a 10% conversion, while the visitors have 9.23 shots, 2.46 on target and a 7% conversion. Additionally clean sheet expected rates are 36% for hosts and only 15% for guests, and the league average BTTS is 48%, so the weak defenses (high concession averages 2.0 and 2.15) increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches for both teams, very high recent concession averages and the hosts' offensive edge, I assess BTTS probability at about 65% and recommend a "Yes" selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite scores on average 1.18 goals per match, while Ceahlăul averages 0.62; their xG are 1.35 (Muscelul) and 1.11 (Ceahlăul), with average concessions of 2.00 and 2.15. Seasonal share of matches over 1.5 goals is 82% for the home team and 85% for the away team, and over 2.5 is 73% vs 46% — the strongest signal is therefore the 1.5 line (combined average ~83.5%). Projected xG for this fixture is approximately 1.70 for the home side (1.35 vs opponent defense 2.04) and 1.47 for the visitors (1.11 vs home defense 1.83), totaling ~3.17 expected goals, which also supports bets over 1.5/2.5. In the last 5 matches both teams have 80% of games over 2.5, and Muscelul records on average 4.18 shots on target versus Ceahlăul’s 2.46 (11.27 vs 9.23 shots), increasing the likelihood of goal-scoring situations. Consequently I recommend Over 1.5 as the safest pick; I estimate ~84% probability for Over 1.5, ~60% for Over 2.5 and only ~22% for Over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the 1/1 scenario (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time) because the home side has a clear offensive advantage: on average 1.18 goals per match versus 0.62 for the away team, higher xG 1.35 vs 1.11 and more shots on target 4.18 vs 2.46 with conversion rates of 10% vs 7%. They also perform better by Half-Time — the home side scores an average of 0.36 goals in the first half versus 0.23 for visitors and led at the break in 27% of their matches compared to 15% for the away team. For Full-Time the case is supported by higher average points (1.0 vs 0.62) and a greater win percentage (27% vs 15%), even though both teams concede frequently (2.0 vs 2.15), which suggests an open match with a home advantage. Additionally, the home team generates many actions after the break (average goals in second halves for the home side 2.18 and 91% of home matches with at least one goal after Half-Time), increasing the likelihood of maintaining or extending a lead. However, the poor recent form of both teams (last 5 matches: home 5 losses, away 4 losses and 1 draw) warrants allowing for X/1 and X/X scenarios, so the distribution places the highest probability on 1/1 while accounting for the risk of a draw or a turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
13Shots10
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
6Shots on target4
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0xG0
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
5Corners2
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0Dangerous attacks0
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
14Fouls11
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0Cards0
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0.46Goals scored / match0.88
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
2.67Goals conceded / match2.08
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
46%Average possession45%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
3.29Shots on target / match3.25
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.13Shots per match10.17
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
3.29Shots on target3.25
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
5%Shot conversion8.6%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
46%Possession45%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
1.1xG for1.21
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
1.77xG against1.95
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Shooting quality

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite: BalancedCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ: Balanced
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.140.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W17% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-18
0.42 pts / match · goal difference -53
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W17% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-15
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-9
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ is 91% better for: goals scored per match.

0.46 goals / match - Muscelul Câmpulung Elite · 0.88 goals / match - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.67 goals / match - Muscelul Câmpulung Elite · 2.08 goals / match - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite scoring profile: mixed

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite scores in 29% of matches (7 of 24 matches), while Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scoring profile: very strong

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Muscelul Câmpulung Elite keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).

11Goals scored (season)21
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
64Goals conceded (season)50
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
3.13Average goals in match2.96
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
20Goals conceded (last 5)11
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

How often they score at least...

29%1 goal63%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
13%2 goals17%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
4%3 goals8%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0%4 goals0%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal75%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
63%2 goals58%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
50%3 goals38%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
29%4 goals13%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

25%
Muscelul Câmpulung Elite - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 24 matches
42%
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 24 matches
48%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time4%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
4%Scored in both halves13%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
38%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
60%BTTS - last 560%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time96%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Muscelul Câmpulung Elite · 0.88 pts / match - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite - half-time state
4% leading38% draw58% trailing
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - half-time state
21% leading25% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)0.88
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0.08Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.13
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
38%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
92%No goal before half-time75%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
1.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
2.08Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
75%No goal after half-time50%
Muscelul Câmpulung EliteCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite - second-half results

17% W21% R63% P
12
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-32
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - second-half results

33% W8% R58% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.03.0
Average goals in match1.23.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-13
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
1
12
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
3
16
61-75
3
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -15 - late phases are a weakness.

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
10
31-45
2
8
46-60
5
12
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
18%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.90
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
30%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
232%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Muscelul Câmpulung EliteLigaCeahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Average goals in match 3.132.69 2.96
Both teams scored 25%48% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%49% 58%
Clean sheets 17%30% 25%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 79%
Goal after half-time 83%81% 96%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Amin Ziblim⚽ 1
Dumitru Rogac⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Muscelul Câmpulung EliteGoalAmin Ziblim
  2. Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţGoalRăzvan Matiș
  3. Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţGoalAlexandru Anton
  4. Muscelul Câmpulung EliteGoalDumitru Rogac

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Muscelul Câmpulung Elite 0 - 0 - 1 Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?

The Liga II match finished Muscelul Câmpulung Elite 3:3 Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?

Muscelul Câmpulung Elite score 0.46 goals per game on average and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 0.88. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Muscelul Câmpulung Elite's matches and 42% of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's.

What form are Muscelul Câmpulung Elite and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ in?

Over the last 5 games Muscelul Câmpulung Elite have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Muscelul Câmpulung Elite vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.