MVV vs AZ II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MVV played AZ II in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 21 November 2025. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

MVV: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AZ II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

MVV scores 1.20 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. AZ II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.87. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MVV 47%, AZ II 47%. Over 2.5: MVV 60%, AZ II 60%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

AZ II has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.35. MVV: 11.9 shots per match, AZ II: 12.3.

Match halves

MVV: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67. AZ II: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

MVV: 76-90+ (5 goals). AZ II: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eerste Divisie: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
MVVAZ II
7Shots16
MVVAZ II
3Shots on target7
MVVAZ II
0.89xG1.84
MVVAZ II
3Corners4
MVVAZ II
32Dangerous attacks47
MVVAZ II
4Fouls12
MVVAZ II
1Cards1
MVVAZ II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.4
MVVAZ II
1.93Goals conceded / match1.87
MVVAZ II
44%Average possession56%
MVVAZ II
4.07Shots on target / match4.4
MVVAZ II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.87Shots per match12.33
MVVAZ II
4.07Shots on target4.4
MVVAZ II
10.1%Shot conversion11.4%
MVVAZ II
44%Possession56%
MVVAZ II
1.35xG for1.45
MVVAZ II
2.08xG against1.37
MVVAZ II

Shooting quality

MVV: BalancedAZ II: Balanced
MVVAZ II
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AZ II is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - MVV · 1.2 pts / match - AZ II

MVV
LWDLL
Season result split
27% W20% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 2.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
AZ II
LWWLL
Season result split
27% W13% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AZ II is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - MVV · 1.4 goals / match - AZ II

MVV scoring profile: strong

MVV scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

AZ II scoring profile: strong

AZ II scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while MVV keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)21
MVVAZ II
29Goals conceded (season)28
MVVAZ II
3.13Average goals in match3.27
MVVAZ II
9Goals scored (last 5)9
MVVAZ II
15Goals conceded (last 5)9
MVVAZ II

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
MVVAZ II
40%2 goals40%
MVVAZ II
20%3 goals27%
MVVAZ II
0%4 goals13%
MVVAZ II

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
MVVAZ II
53%2 goals53%
MVVAZ II
33%3 goals33%
MVVAZ II
27%4 goals20%
MVVAZ II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time40%
MVVAZ II
7%BTTS in both halves0%
MVVAZ II
27%Scored in both halves27%
MVVAZ II

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
MVVAZ II
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
MVVAZ II
80%BTTS - last 540%
MVVAZ II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
MVVAZ II
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
MVVAZ II
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
MVVAZ II

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MVVAZ II
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
MVVAZ II
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
MVVAZ II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ II is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - MVV · 0.93 pts / match - AZ II

MVV - half-time state
13% leading47% draw40% trailing
AZ II - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)0.93
MVVAZ II
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.73
MVVAZ II
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
MVVAZ II
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.67
MVVAZ II
47%Clean sheet before half-time27%
MVVAZ II
60%No goal before half-time47%
MVVAZ II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.07
MVVAZ II
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
MVVAZ II
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
MVVAZ II
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.6
MVVAZ II
33%Clean sheet after half-time53%
MVVAZ II
53%No goal after half-time67%
MVVAZ II

MVV - second-half results

27% W33% D40% L
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding208%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AZ II - second-half results

27% W27% D47% L
14
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MVV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.41.6
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
AZ II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MVV
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
2
5
31-45
1
6
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

AZ II
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
7
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MVV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

AZ II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

MVVLigaAZ II
Average goals in match 3.133.25 3.27
Both teams scored 47%59% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%62% 60%
Clean sheets 20%22% 20%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 87%
Goal after half-time 87%88% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MVVSubstitutionOn: Kanou SyOff: Lenn-Minh Quang Tran
  2. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Hessel de WitOff: Yoël van den Ban
  3. AZ IIYellow cardJesper Zwart
  4. MVVYellow cardCamil Mmaee
  5. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Deacon van der KlaauwOff: Jasper Hartog

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Kevin PutsMatches officiated: 19
3.32Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins16%Draws37%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of MVV vs AZ II?

The Eerste Divisie match finished MVV 1:3 AZ II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MVV vs AZ II?

MVV score 1.20 goals per game on average and AZ II 1.40. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 47% of MVV's matches and 47% of AZ II's.

What form are MVV and AZ II in?

Over the last 5 games MVV have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AZ II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MVV vs AZ II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MVV vs AZ II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.