Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah: match statistics
Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Naft Bandar Abbas played Be'sat Kermanshah in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Venue: Khalij Fars Stadium. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Naft Bandar Abbas: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Be'sat Kermanshah: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.72 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. Be'sat Kermanshah scores 0.75 and concedes 0.84. League average: 1.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Naft Bandar Abbas 38%, Be'sat Kermanshah 25%. Over 2.5: Naft Bandar Abbas 16%, Be'sat Kermanshah 25%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Naft Bandar Abbas has higher xG: 0.96 vs 0.92. Naft Bandar Abbas: 0.5 shots per match, Be'sat Kermanshah: 0.5.
Match halves
Naft Bandar Abbas: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.34. Be'sat Kermanshah: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Naft Bandar Abbas: 31-45+ (6 goals). Be'sat Kermanshah: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.56 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Naft Bandar Abbas holds a clear advantage in key metrics: at home they concede just 0.5 goals per match and record 50% clean sheets, while Be'sat Kermanshah averages only 0.44 goals scored per away match and fails to score in 69% of away games. In the last 5 fixtures the home side averages 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss) versus the visitors' 0.8 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), indicating Naft's superior form. Naft averages 4 shots on target and 7 attempts at home with a conversion rate around 29%, whereas the visitors register 2.29 on-target and 6 attempts away with a 10% conversion and an away xG of 0.92 compared to the home xG of 1.05. Although Naft's home scoring rate is modest at 0.81 goals per match, their positive home goal difference (+5) and the visitors' poor away efficiency (0.44 goals and -9 away goal difference) favor a home win, while Naft's high home draw rate (56%) keeps a draw a realistic outcome. Based on this I back a home victory, estimating probabilities of approximately 60% for Naft, 30% for a draw and 10% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators point to a low probability of BTTS: Naft has BTTS 31%, Be'sat 19%, and the league BTTS is 30% with an average goals 1.56 and as many as 93% of matches ending in a clean sheet for one side. Naft scores 1.06 and concedes 0.69 per match, while Be'sat has only 0.44 scored and 1.00 conceded, suggesting only the home side is moderately dangerous offensively. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS 0%: Naft scored 3 goals (0.6 avg) and conceded 1 (0.2), whereas Be'sat scored 1 (0.2) and conceded 5 (1.0), indicating weak away effectiveness. Additionally, Be'sat has xG 0.92 with an average of 6.0 shots and 2.29 on target, but actually only scores 0.44 goals per match, so despite creating chances they rarely convert them; therefore I rate No BTTS as the stronger signal (NO 85% vs YES 15%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast 1.03 xG for the home side and 0.56 for the away side (total 1.59), which is very close to the league average of 1.56 goals per match. Naft averages 1.06 goals per game, Be'sat only 0.44, and only 25% of each team’s matches this season exceed 2.5 goals (league 21%), indicating a low probability of a high-scoring game. I rate Over 1.5 as moderately likely: Naft has 56% such games at home, Be'sat 44% away, leading to an estimated Over 1.5 probability of ~58%. By contrast, Over 3.5 looks extremely unlikely — only 6% of matches involving both teams exceed 3.5 goals this season, so Under 3.5 is the strongest signal (94%). Additionally, the last 5 rounds show defensive form from the hosts (3 goals scored, 1 conceded) and weak attacking output from the visitors (1 scored, 5 conceded), which further supports the Under 3.5 selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate low-scoring and often draw-prone first halves: hosts score on average 0.29 goals by half-time, visitors 0.06, and a clean sheet at the break occurred in 71% of hosts’ matches and 69% of visitors’ matches. Over the full match the hosts are notably stronger — they score 1.06 goals per game versus 0.44 for visitors, average 1.63 points per game against opponents’ 0.75, winning 44% of matches compared to just 13% for away wins. First-half statistics also show visitors have never led at the break (0 instances), while hosts led in 4 matches (29%), which increases the likelihood of a draw at half-time rather than an away lead. The second half favours a decision for the home side: second-half goals average 0.86 for hosts and 1.00 for visitors, and hosts gain on average 1.36 points after the break versus 1.06 for visitors, so a Half-Time draw frequently turns into a home win. Given these figures the strongest scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win Full-Time, therefore I recommend the HT/FT bet X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Be'sat Kermanshah | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -70% | -53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.81 | 1.74 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.8 pts / match - Be'sat Kermanshah
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.56 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.84 goals / match - Be'sat Kermanshah
Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Be'sat Kermanshah keeps a clean sheet in 44% (14 of 32 matches).
Be'sat Kermanshah scores in 44% of matches (14 of 32 matches), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 50% (16 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Bandar Abbas
Over / Under - Be'sat Kermanshah
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1 pts / match - Be'sat Kermanshah
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Be'sat Kermanshah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Naft Bandar Abbas
Be'sat Kermanshah
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Liga | Be'sat Kermanshah | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.28 | 1.56 | • 1.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 38% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | • 47% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Naft Bandar Abbas 0 - 1 - 0 Be'sat Kermanshah. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Bandar Abbas 3:0 Be'sat Kermanshah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
Naft Bandar Abbas score 0.72 goals per game on average and Be'sat Kermanshah 0.75. The Azadegan League average is 1.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Naft Bandar Abbas's matches and 25% of Be'sat Kermanshah's.
What form are Naft Bandar Abbas and Be'sat Kermanshah in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Bandar Abbas have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Be'sat Kermanshah 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Be'sat Kermanshah: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


