Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Naft Bandar Abbas played Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Khalij Fars Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Naft Bandar Abbas: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Sanat Naft: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.77 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67. League average: 1.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Naft Bandar Abbas 40%, Sanat Naft 40%. Over 2.5: Naft Bandar Abbas 17%, Sanat Naft 27%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.09 vs 0.96. Naft Bandar Abbas: 0.6 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 4.3.
Match halves
Naft Bandar Abbas: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.37. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
Naft Bandar Abbas: 31-45+ (6 goals). Sanat Naft: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.54 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Naft Bandar Abbas scores on average 0.87 goals at home and concedes only 0.53 per match, and has conceded just 1 goal in the last five fixtures overall; Sanat Naft has conceded 6 goals in their last five matches and concedes 0.71 goals on average away. Both teams have similar expected chances (xG 1.05 for the hosts vs 1.12 for the visitors) and have scored 4 goals each in the last 5 matches, but the hosts convert chances far better (shot conversion at home 29% vs 9% for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts collect an average of 2 points per match in their last 5 games versus 1.4 for their opponents and have a lower share of matches without scoring (33% vs 57%), supporting a slight home edge. At the same time, the high share of home draws (53%) indicates a tight game, so the forecast also accounts for a meaningful probability of a split of points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick "No" because Naft Bandar Abbas concedes an average of 0.63 goals per match this season and only 0.2 in the last 5 matches, and keeps a clean sheet in 44% of games, which significantly reduces BTTS probability. Sanat Naft scores an average of 0.64 goals per match this season and has a season BTTS of 29% (BTTS 40% in the last 5 matches), so the away side has limited scoring efficiency. xG analysis shows expected values around 1.09 for the home team (xG_for_home 1.08 vs xG_against_away 1.09) and around 0.90 for the away team (xG_for_away 1.12 vs xG_against_home 0.68), providing a moderate but unconvincing chance for both teams to score. Additionally, Sanat concedes more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4) with lower conversion (9% vs 13%), and the league BTTS level is only 30%, which combined with a higher clean sheet rate suggests a greater likelihood that one side will remain goalless. Considering season BTTS 50% for the home team and 29% for the away (average 39%) and the home side’s dominant defense in recent matches, I estimate BTTS probability at 40% for "Yes" and 60% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging both sides' xG, I project approximately 1.09 xG for the home team (xG_for_home 1.08 and xG_against_away 1.09 → avg 1.09) and 0.90 xG for the away team (xG_for_away 1.12 and xG_against_home 0.68 → avg 0.90), totaling ~1.99 goals. A Poisson model with λ=1.99 gives ~59% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~32% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~14% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal figures support caution: Naft Bandar Abbas has Over2.5 in 31% of matches and Over3.5 in 13%, while Sanat Naft records 21% and 0% respectively, so 4+ goal games are rare. Additionally, hosts average 1.31 goals scored and concede 0.63 per match, and in the last 5 fixtures Naft Bandar Abbas scored 4 and conceded 1 (Sanat Naft scored 4 and conceded 6), which further suppresses goal tempo. In light of these data the strongest signal is the Under at the 3.5 line (under ≈86%), while Over 1.5 is moderately likely (~59%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Home win at Full-Time (X/1). The hosts draw at the break in 81% of their matches, while the visitors do so in 71%, indicating a strong propensity for a draw at half-time. Despite this, the hosts win 56% of matches versus 29% for the visitors and average 1.31 goals per match compared to the opponents' 0.64, so the home advantage in the final result is pronounced. After the break the hosts score on average 0.88 goals versus the visitors' 0.64 and have 69% of matches with at least one goal in the second half, which favors a turnaround from the draw to their advantage. Additionally, the visitors almost never hold a lead at the break (0% leads), and the hosts' finishing efficiency (shot conversion 13% vs 9%) reinforces the X/1 selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -52% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.52 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.83 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1.4 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
0.77 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 1 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Naft Bandar Abbas is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.67 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
Sanat Naft scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Bandar Abbas
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas · 0.97 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Naft Bandar Abbas
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Bandar Abbas | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.37 | 1.54 | ▲ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 30% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | • 47% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Naft Bandar Abbas 0 - 0 - 1 Sanat Naft. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Bandar Abbas 0:0 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft?
Naft Bandar Abbas score 0.77 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.00. The Azadegan League average is 1.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Naft Bandar Abbas's matches and 40% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Naft Bandar Abbas and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Bandar Abbas have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sanat Naft 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Naft Bandar Abbas vs Sanat Naft: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


