Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: match statistics
Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Naft Gachsaran played Mes Shahr-e Babak in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 16 July 2026. Venue: Naft Gachsaran Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Naft Gachsaran: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Mes Shahr-e Babak: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Naft Gachsaran scores 0.76 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 1.15 and concedes 0.42. League average: 1.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Naft Gachsaran 45%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 27%. Over 2.5: Naft Gachsaran 33%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 18%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Mes Shahr-e Babak has higher xG: 1.19 vs 0.66. Naft Gachsaran: 0.5 shots per match, Mes Shahr-e Babak: 5.4.
Match halves
Naft Gachsaran: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.36. Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Naft Gachsaran: 76-90+ (10 goals). Mes Shahr-e Babak: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.58 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Shahr-e Babak is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table with 18 wins this season versus Naft Gachsaran’s 7 wins (12th). The visitors have scored 38 and conceded only 14 goals this season, while the hosts have 25 scored and 39 conceded, and the home goal difference for the hosts is -5. In the last 5 matches Naft has scored 4 goals but conceded 13 and collected just 1 point (0.2 points per game on average), whereas Mes has also scored 4, conceded 2 and accumulated 8 points (1.6 points per game). Away, Mes averages 8.67 shots and 3.67 shots on target per match and 1.25 average goals with clean sheets in 56% of matches, while the hosts average 0.75 goals per home game and fail to score in 50% of home matches. Given the superiority in number of wins (18 vs 7), better goal differential (38-14 vs 25-39) and significantly stronger recent form, I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long signals indicate a low probability of BTTS - Yes: BTTS occurs for the home side in 29% of matches and for the away side in 25%, versus a league average of 30%. Defensive metrics point toward a clean sheet expected — Naft has 65% clean sheets, Mes Shahr-e Babak 56%, with seasonal average goals conceded of 0.35 and 0.5 per match. Short-term Naft is defensively vulnerable: in the last 5 matches they conceded 13 goals (2.6 per match) and have 40% BTTS in L5, while the visitors conceded 2 goals in L5 (0.4 per match) and have 20% BTTS. xG shows moderate scoring opportunities — home xG 1.24 vs xG against for the visitors 1.17, and away xG 1.12 vs xG against for the hosts 0.91, which does not suggest regular goal exchanges. Considering the stronger season-long signal for low BTTS and high clean sheet rates (65%/56%), I tip No Goal with a probability of 72% versus 28% for Goal/Goal (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-shots-based model projects total expected goals of 2.23: home ~1.21 (attack xG 1.24 vs opponents’ xG against 1.17) and away ~1.02 (attack xG 1.12 vs opponents’ xG against 0.91). Using a Poisson distribution this yields ~65% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~38% for minimum 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~19% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Historically both teams rarely reach >=3 goals (seasonal 18% home, 19% away), and the home side has a high clean sheet rate (65%), which limits Over 2.5 upside. Nevertheless, the number of shots on target (home 4.62, away 3.67) and the advantage in expected xG over the league average (2.23 vs 1.58) raise the probability of at least two strikes, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly point to a draw at Half-Time: both teams concede on average only 0.06 goals before the break, and the percentage of clean sheets at Half-Time is 94% for each side, so a tied score in the first half is the strongest signal. Home advantage favors the hosts over 90 minutes — 2.24 points per home match and a 65% win rate — along with superior xG numbers (1.24 vs 1.12) and lower xG against (0.91 vs 1.17), suggesting they are more likely to decide the match by Full-Time. Most goals come in the second half: hosts average 0.76 goals after the break and visitors 1.19, so the outcome is expected after the turnaround, not necessarily before Half-Time. Risk must be considered — in their last 5 matches the hosts have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, while the visitors' last 5 are 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss — therefore draw scenarios and an away win have a significant share in the probability distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Gachsaran | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -40% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.27 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Naft Gachsaran · 1.6 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
0.76 goals / match - Naft Gachsaran · 1.15 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 181% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - Naft Gachsaran · 0.42 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Naft Gachsaran scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 61% (20 of 33 matches).
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 70% of matches (23 of 33 matches), while Naft Gachsaran keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Gachsaran
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Naft Gachsaran · 1.88 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Gachsaran - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Naft Gachsaran
Mes Shahr-e Babak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Gachsaran | Liga | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.94 | 1.58 | • 1.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 46% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 61% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | • 58% | 57% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Naft Gachsaran 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Gachsaran 0:2 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
Naft Gachsaran score 0.76 goals per game on average and Mes Shahr-e Babak 1.15. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Naft Gachsaran's matches and 27% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's.
What form are Naft Gachsaran and Mes Shahr-e Babak in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Gachsaran have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Mes Shahr-e Babak 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The statistical background for Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


