Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa: match statistics
Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Naft Gachsaran played Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 21 May 2026. Venue: Naft Gachsaran Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Naft Gachsaran: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Saipa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Naft Gachsaran scores 0.75 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Saipa scores 0.83 and concedes 0.54. League average: 1.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Naft Gachsaran 50%, Saipa 25%. Over 2.5: Naft Gachsaran 25%, Saipa 25%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Saipa has higher xG: 1.31 vs 0.69. Naft Gachsaran: 0.8 shots per match, Saipa: 5.0.
Match halves
Naft Gachsaran: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.29. Saipa: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Naft Gachsaran: 31-45+ (6 goals). Saipa: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.48 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Saipa is the favorite for this match and I predict an away win; Saipa sits 5th in the table while Naft Gachsaran are 13th. This season Saipa have scored 20 and conceded 13, whereas Naft have a 18–25 record, clearly indicating the visitors’ defensive edge. Away, Saipa concedes only 0.58 goals per game on average and keep clean sheets in 67% of matches, while Naft at home concede 0.82 and have 36% clean sheets, so the visitors are more defensively stable. Saipa also constructs more chances — averaging 9.4 shots and 4.4 on target away with xG 1.3 — whereas Naft at home average 0.91 goals per game and xG data is unavailable, suggesting lower-quality attacking chances for the hosts; over the last 5 matches both teams have scored 5 goals each, but Saipa averages 1.6 points per game in the last 5 versus 1.2 for Naft. Therefore I assign a 44% probability to a Saipa win, 36% to a draw and 20% to a home victory, based on the superior goal record (20–13), higher chance-creation efficiency (xG 1.3, 9.4 shots) and more stable away defence.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long statistics strongly argue against BTTS: Naft has BTTS at 33%, Saipa 17% (average 25%), and the league BTTS is 32% with as many as 92% of matches ending in a clean sheet. However, in the last 5 matches both teams show a greater propensity to exchange goals – BTTS 60% for each, with an average of 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded goals (5 scored and 5 conceded in the last 5). Both teams generate promising xG: 1.32 for Naft and 1.30 for Saipa, and register 3.88 and 4.4 shots on target, but shot efficiency is low (conversion 10% for the home side vs 6% for the away), which suppresses actual goal totals. Additionally, season defensive metrics show both sides have high clean sheet rates (67% each) and very low average goals conceded (0.5 for Naft and 0.58 for Saipa), which works against BTTS. For these reasons I estimate BTTS probability at 40% for 'Yes' and 60% for 'No', and the betting recommendation is 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal balance analysis suggests a moderately open game: Naft Gachsaran xG is 1.32 versus Saipa-opponent xG 1.04, yielding Naft about 1.18 expected goals, while Saipa has xG 1.30 versus Naft-opponent xG 0.77 or roughly 1.04, totaling ~2.22 goals. Shot metrics (10.0 and 9.4) and shots on target (3.88 and 4.4) confirm offensive potential, but Saipa’s low conversion rate of 6% and a high clean sheet rate of 67% for both teams limit scoring. Season Over2.5 rates are only 33% for the home side and 17% for the visitors, and Over3.5 occurs in 8% of matches for both teams, reducing the likelihood of a very high scoreline. Considering xG and seasonal trends I estimate about 62% for Over1.5, about 36% for Over2.5 and about 18% for Over3.5. The strongest play signal is over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) due to the combined xG of 2.22 and a relatively high (~62%) probability of exceeding 1.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a half-time draw and a full-time draw (X/X) as the most likely scenario. The home side were level at the break in 67% of matches, scoring on average 0.67 goals in the first half versus 0.25 for the visitors, and were never behind at half-time (0%), which supports a low-goal first half and a draw at the break. Half of the home team’s matches finish with the same score as at half-time (50%), and the home team’s overall draw rate this season is 50%, so maintaining the half-time score is plausible. The teams’ xG are similar (1.32 vs 1.30), while the home side converts chances more efficiently (10% vs 6% conversion), which gives them an alternative outcome of X/1, but the league’s high share of clean sheets (92%) favors a match without a decisive result. In my model X/X received a 33% probability, X/1 28%, 1/1 17%, 1/X 15%, X/2 5%, 1/2 2% and scenarios with the away side leading at half-time 0%, therefore I recommend the X/X pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Gachsaran | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -10% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.83 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Saipa is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Naft Gachsaran · 1.6 pts / match - Saipa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Saipa is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
0.75 goals / match - Naft Gachsaran · 0.83 goals / match - Saipa
Saipa is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Naft Gachsaran · 0.54 goals / match - Saipa
Naft Gachsaran scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (16 of 24 matches).
Saipa scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Naft Gachsaran keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Gachsaran
Over / Under - Saipa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Saipa is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Naft Gachsaran · 1.5 pts / match - Saipa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Gachsaran - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Saipa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Naft Gachsaran
Saipa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Gachsaran | Liga | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.79 | 1.48 | ▼ 1.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 47% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 45% | • 46% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 54% | • 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Naft Gachsaran 0 - 1 - 0 Saipa. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Gachsaran 2:1 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
Naft Gachsaran score 0.75 goals per game on average and Saipa 0.83. The Azadegan League average is 1.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Naft Gachsaran's matches and 25% of Saipa's.
What form are Naft Gachsaran and Saipa in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Gachsaran have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Saipa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


