Nafta vs Beltinci: match statistics
Nafta vs Beltinci: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nafta played Beltinci in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Nafta: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Beltinci: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 2.26 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Beltinci scores 1.85 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 56%, Beltinci 41%. Over 2.5: Nafta 44%, Beltinci 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Beltinci has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.59. Nafta: 12.1 shots per match, Beltinci: 14.0.
Match halves
Nafta: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 1.22. Beltinci: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 76-90+ (13 goals). Beltinci: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nafta is the clear favorite: this season they have 22 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, top the table and have scored 61 goals; in their last 5 matches they have won all 5, scoring 10 goals. At home Nafta averages 2.62 goals and generates 1.73 xG with 5.69 shots on target and a 19% conversion rate, while Beltinci away average 1.62 goals per game, 1.62 xG and a 13% conversion. The visitors’ defence, however, is very solid: Beltinci concede only 0.46 goals on average away and keep 69% clean sheets, whereas Nafta concede 0.85 at home and have 23% clean sheets. This means the home advantage is primarily offensive efficiency (61 vs 50 goals on the season, 2.62 vs 1.62 goals per game and 19% vs 13% conversion), but the high clean-sheet rate for the visitors reduces the expected margin of victory. Considering Nafta’s unbeaten run and superior chance finishing, I project a home win: 60% Nafta, 20% draw, 20% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment, it is more likely that both teams will not score ('No Goal'): I assign this scenario 65% vs 35% for BTTS - Yes. Beltinci has a season clean sheet rate of 69% and BTTS only 23%, with an average goals conceded of 0.46 per match, which clearly demonstrates their defensive strength. Nafta at home scores 2.07 goals per game and has xG_for 1.96 with 15.57 shots (6.07 on target), which increases the hosts' chance of scoring, but this is offset by Beltinci's low susceptibility to conceding. Additionally, in the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS in only 20% of cases and conceded on average 0.2 goals per game (1 goal in 5 fixtures), reinforcing the 'No Goal' trend. Although the league average BTTS is 49% and average goals per match is 2.79, the disparity in season rates (Nafta BTTS 57% vs Beltinci 23%) and Beltinci's high clean sheet percentage produce a stronger signal for 'No Goal'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Nafta scores an average of 2.07 goals per game (xG 1.96), while Beltinci averages 1.62 goals (xG 1.62) and concedes only 0.46 goals per game; the match xG projection gives 1.53 goals for Nafta and 1.35 for Beltinci, totaling 2.88 goals. With an expected total of 2.88 goals, a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 78% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 55% for Over 2.5 goals and around 33% for Over 3.5 goals. Nafta has 64% of matches with Over 2.5 goals this season and averages 15.57 shots per game (6.07 on target) versus Beltinci’s 12.23 and 5.15, which reinforces the signal for more goals despite Beltinci’s high clean sheet rate (69%). For these reasons the best line to play appears to be Over 2.5: the xG balance, Nafta’s high shot volume and the league average goals of 2.79 provide an edge for the Over 2.5 wager.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The away side are clear favorites for the final victory: they have a 77% win rate this season and average 2.46 points per match versus the home team’s 50% win rate and 1.79 points per match. At half-time defensive metrics favor the visitors — they concede just 0.08 goals on average to 45' and keep a clean sheet at the break in 92% of matches, while leading at the break in 54% of games. The hosts, however, create more (xG 1.96 vs 1.62 and 15.57 shots per game versus 12.23), which gives them a chance to score before half-time, though conversion efficiency is equal at 13% for both sides. Overall the strongest signal from the data is the 2/2 scenario (away leading at the break and winning), with the alternative Half-Time/Full-Time outcome of X/2 (draw at the break and away win) also carrying significant probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 15% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Nafta · 2.6 pts / match - Beltinci
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
2.26 goals / match - Nafta · 1.85 goals / match - Beltinci
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (27 of 27 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 56% (15 of 27 matches).
Beltinci scores in 85% of matches (23 of 27 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nafta
Over / Under - Beltinci
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.19 pts / match - Nafta · 1.85 pts / match - Beltinci
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 81%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Beltinci - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nafta
Beltinci
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Beltinci | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.96 | 2.81 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 29% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Beltinci. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nafta vs Beltinci?
The 2. SNL match finished Nafta 2:1 Beltinci. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Beltinci?
Nafta score 2.26 goals per game on average and Beltinci 1.85. The 2. SNL average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Nafta's matches and 41% of Beltinci's.
What form are Nafta and Beltinci in?
Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Beltinci 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Beltinci?
The statistical background for Nafta vs Beltinci — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


