Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of 17 October 2026

Nafta vs Celje: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Celje crest
Celje

Nafta vs Celje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nafta played Celje in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Nafta: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match. Celje: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nafta scores 2.25 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Celje scores 1.33 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nafta 50%, Celje 67%. Over 2.5: Nafta 50%, Celje 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.47. Nafta: 12.0 shots per match, Celje: 11.7.

Match halves

Nafta: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Celje: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Nafta: 46-60 (3 goals). Celje: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nafta sit 2nd and have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, winning 3 games, while Celje have recorded just 1 win and 3 draws over the same period. The hosts are highly effective at home: they score an average of 2.5 goals per match, register 12 shots, including 7 on target, and have a conversion rate of 21%. Celje remain unbeaten throughout the season, but their latest dddlw run highlights their difficulty in turning dominance into wins, while they have conceded 8 goals in their last five matches. Nafta’s defence is also vulnerable, as they allow opponents an xG of 2.04 at home and concede an average of 2 goals, increasing the visitors’ chances of scoring. Despite the risk of a close, high-scoring match, Nafta’s greater attacking potential and superior current form point towards a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Recent form clearly supports goals at both ends: Nafta have recorded BTTS in 40% of their last five matches, while Celje have done so in as many as 80%. Over this period, both teams have averaged 2.0 and 1.6 goals scored respectively, with Celje conceding 1.6 goals per match. Their attacking potential is further supported by identical average xG figures from the last five matches, at 1.63 each, while Nafta allowed opponents an xG of 1.84. Nafta’s season BTTS rate stands at 67%, above the league average of 47%, although Celje’s limited away data increases uncertainty. Nevertheless, the combination of both teams’ current scoring efficiency and the home side’s defensive vulnerability gives a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score — BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal. BTTS - No would mean that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically indicate a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Nafta have averaged 2.0 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Celje have conceded 1.6 goals per game over the same period. The attacking potential of both sides is reflected in identical five-match xG averages of 1.63, while Nafta allowed opponents an xG as high as 1.84. Celje have scored 8 and conceded 8 goals in their last five appearances, with matches involving the team seeing both sides score in 80% of cases. Nafta have surpassed the 1.5-goal threshold in 67% of their league matches so far, while their average total goals per game this season stands at 2.33. The projected total of 2.75 goals clearly favours Over 1.5 goals, although the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are more vulnerable to a tighter, more cautious game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Nafta win at full-time, as Celje were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Nafta led after 45 minutes in only 2 of their 5 games during the same period. The hosts clearly improve after the break: in their last five appearances, they averaged 1.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded in the second half, winning the second half in 80% of cases. Nafta also have the better current full-match form, with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.0 goals scored, while Celje have won only once and drawn as many as 3 times. In addition, Nafta’s home data show that they did not score before half-time, but averaged 1.33 goals after the interval, supporting a cautious start followed by a late shift in momentum in the hosts’ favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
NaftaCelje
11Shots13
NaftaCelje
8Shots on target6
NaftaCelje
1.57xG1.76
NaftaCelje
4Corners9
NaftaCelje
44Dangerous attacks70
NaftaCelje
16Fouls6
NaftaCelje
2Cards1
NaftaCelje

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.25Goals scored / match1.33
NaftaCelje
1.25Goals conceded / match1
NaftaCelje
46%Average possession61%
NaftaCelje
5.75Shots on target / match3
NaftaCelje

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match11.67
NaftaCelje
5.75Shots on target3
NaftaCelje
18.8%Shot conversion11.4%
NaftaCelje
46%Possession61%
NaftaCelje
1.53xG for1.47
NaftaCelje
2.08xG against1.39
NaftaCelje

Shooting quality

Nafta: Counter-attackingCelje: Balanced
NaftaCelje
Accuracy (shots on target)48%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nafta is 5% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / match - Nafta · 1.67 pts / match - Celje

Nafta
LWWD
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 2.08BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Celje
DDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

2.25 goals / match - Nafta · 1.33 goals / match - Celje

Celje is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Nafta · 1 goals / match - Celje

Nafta scoring profile: strong

Nafta scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Celje scoring profile: very strong

Celje scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

9Goals scored (season)4
NaftaCelje
5Goals conceded (season)3
NaftaCelje
3.5Average goals in match2.33
NaftaCelje
9Goals scored (last 5)4
NaftaCelje
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
NaftaCelje

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
NaftaCelje
50%2 goals33%
NaftaCelje
50%3 goals0%
NaftaCelje
25%4 goals0%
NaftaCelje

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal67%
NaftaCelje
50%2 goals33%
NaftaCelje
0%3 goals0%
NaftaCelje
0%4 goals0%
NaftaCelje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
NaftaCelje
25%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaCelje
50%Scored in both halves0%
NaftaCelje

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
NaftaCelje
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NaftaCelje
50%BTTS - last 567%
NaftaCelje

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
NaftaCelje
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
NaftaCelje
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NaftaCelje

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NaftaCelje
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
NaftaCelje
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
NaftaCelje

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nafta is 355% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Nafta · 0.33 pts / match - Celje

Nafta - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Celje - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.33
NaftaCelje
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0
NaftaCelje
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
NaftaCelje
1.5Average goals (1st half)0.67
NaftaCelje
25%Clean sheet before half-time33%
NaftaCelje
50%No goal before half-time100%
NaftaCelje

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)3
NaftaCelje
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
NaftaCelje
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
NaftaCelje
2Average goals (2nd half)1.67
NaftaCelje
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
NaftaCelje
25%No goal after half-time0%
NaftaCelje

Nafta - second-half results

75% W0% D25% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Celje - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.502.25
Goals scored / match0.81.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.52.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals25%25%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
Celje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.333.00
Goals scored / match0.01.3
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match0.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Celje
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
186%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Celje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaCelje
Average goals in match▲ 3.502.47▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▲ 50%47%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%37%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 25%29%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%84%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%89%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CeljeGoalVeton Tusha
  2. NaftaGoalLuka Poredos
  3. NaftaSubstitutionOn: André Monteiro FerreiraOff: Luka Kambič
  4. NaftaYellow cardKimi Lavrencic
  5. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Mark ZabukovnikOff: Veton Tusha
  6. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Shyon OmraniOff: Luka Pihler
  7. CeljeYellow cardDamjan Vukliševič
  8. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Andrej MicicOff: Josip Ivan Zorica
  9. NaftaYellow cardAndré Monteiro Ferreira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Celje?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 1:3 Celje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Celje?

Nafta score 2.25 goals per game on average and Celje 1.33. The PrvaLiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nafta's matches and 67% of Celje's.

What form are Nafta and Celje in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Celje 1-2-0 (1.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Celje?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.