Nafta vs Dekani: match statistics
Nafta vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nafta play Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Nafta: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 2.17 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 60%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Nafta 47%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Nafta has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.32. Nafta: 12.3 shots per match, Dekani: 9.4.
Match halves
Nafta: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.23. Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Nafta is the clear favorite and I back a home win (1). Home form supports this: 82% wins, no defeats and an average of 2.64 goals per home game versus Dekani’s 0.82 goals away. Nafta creates notably more and higher-quality chances — average xG at home 1.81 vs 1.38 for Dekani, 14.45 shots and 5.82 on target per game compared to 9.82 shots and 3.36 on target, with shot conversion 18% vs 8% for the visitors. Defensively Nafta concedes 0.91 goals per home game with average xG against 1.39, while Dekani concedes 1.27 goals away and has a negative away record (-5). Nafta has 0% home matches without scoring, whereas Dekani fail to score in 45% of away fixtures, further lowering the visitors’ chances. Considering the last 5 matches (Nafta 9 goals and 2.0 pts per game, Dekani 7 goals and 1.6 pts per game), I assess probabilities as: Nafta 72%, draw 20%, Dekani 8%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Nafta · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - Nafta · 1.33 goals / match - Dekani
Nafta is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Nafta · 1.53 goals / match - Dekani
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Nafta
Over / Under — Dekani
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.03 pts / match - Nafta · 1.07 pts / match - Dekani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nafta
Dekani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.93 | 2.82 | • 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 28% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Dekani. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nafta vs Dekani?
The 2. SNL match finished Nafta 3:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Dekani?
Nafta score 2.17 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nafta's matches and 53% of Dekani's.
What form are Nafta and Dekani in?
Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Dekani?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nafta vs Dekani: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.