Nafta vs Krško: match statistics
Nafta are the clear favorites for this match, sitting in 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins and just 5 draws this season. The hosts are in dominant form at home, winning 80% of their home matches while averaging 2.5 goals scored per game and conceding just 0.9. Krško, on the other hand, are in 13th place with a terrible away record – 60% of their away games end in defeat, averaging 2 goals conceded per match and scoring just 0.8 goals. The quality gap is further confirmed by expected goals, where Nafta hold a 1.75 xG to 1.18 xG advantage over the visitors. The current form of both teams (Nafta with 1.2 PPG in their last 5 matches compared to Krško's 0.4 PPG) along with the goal difference (+16 for the hosts, -12 for the visitors) clearly points to a convincing victory for Nafta.
Nafta vs Krško: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nafta played Krško in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Nafta: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Krško: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 2.25 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Krško scores 0.80 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 65%, Krško 40%. Over 2.5: Nafta 45%, Krško 55%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Nafta has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.18. Nafta: 12.9 shots per match, Krško: 8.9.
Match halves
Nafta: half-time lead 65%, second-half goals 1.20. Krško: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 61-75 (10 goals). Krško: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nafta are the clear favorites for this match, sitting in 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 15 wins and just 5 draws this season. The hosts are in dominant form at home, winning 80% of their home matches while averaging 2.5 goals scored per game and conceding just 0.9. Krško, on the other hand, are in 13th place with a terrible away record – 60% of their away games end in defeat, averaging 2 goals conceded per match and scoring just 0.8 goals. The quality gap is further confirmed by expected goals, where Nafta hold a 1.75 xG to 1.18 xG advantage over the visitors. The current form of both teams (Nafta with 1.2 PPG in their last 5 matches compared to Krško's 0.4 PPG) along with the goal difference (+16 for the hosts, -12 for the visitors) clearly points to a convincing victory for Nafta.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have very weak defensive metrics this season (Nafta concedes 2.1 goals/match, Krško 2.0), supporting the scenario of goals from both sides. Furthermore, the average xG against is high and almost identical (both 2.01), and Krško has not recorded a single clean sheet (CS 0%), so a goal from Nafta looks likely. Nafta also rarely keeps a clean sheet (CS 10%) and allows many chances, which, given Krško's offensive xG of 1.18, provides a realistic chance for them to score. The downside for BTTS is the low average goals scored (both 0.8) and high failure to score rates (FTS: Nafta 60%, Krško 50%), especially for the away side. However, Nafta's form in the last 5 matches strongly boosts BTTS (80%) and, combined with the overall defensive weakness on both sides, tilts the forecast slightly towards 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model indicates an elevated risk of goals primarily due to weak defenses: Nafta concedes an average of 2.1 goals/match, and Krško 2.0, with xG against being very high on both sides (xg_against_avg 2.01 vs 2.01). This supports a scenario of at least 2 goals, which is consistent with the seasonal Over 1.5 rates (Nafta 100%, Krško 70%) and very low clean sheet percentages (10% and 0%). At the same time, finishing efficiency is low (a conversion rate of 9% from ~9 shots/match), and in the last 5 matches, Over 2.5 occurred in only 20% of each team's games, which limits the goal 'ceiling'. Therefore, the expected total goals is approximately 2.80, giving a slight edge to Over 2.5, but not as strong as the signal for Over 1.5. The 3.5 line is less attractive, as Under 3.5 dominates seasonally (Nafta 60%, Krško 80%) and results more often end in the 2–3 goal range.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for the half-time result is a draw: Krško has a 40% draw rate at HT this season and as much as 60% in the last 5 matches, with a low average of first-half goals (AVGHT 1.3 for Nafta, 1.2 for Krško) and a very low BTTS HT rate (10% each). Nafta has been picking up points significantly better in the last 5 matches (1.2 PPG vs 0.4), while Krško has not won any of those games (0% wins) and lost 60%. Both teams concede heavily over the season (2.1 and 2.0 goals per match), which favors a resolution after the break, especially since second halves are more goal-rich (over 0.5 in second-half goals: 90% each). Krško's HT profile shows frequent 'fails to score' (FTS HT 80%) while also conceding goals on average (concededAVGHT 1.0), increasing the likelihood that after a calmer first half, Nafta will turn the result in their favor. Therefore, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time outcome is X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Krško | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 350% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Nafta · 0.4 pts / match - Krško
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 181% better for: goals scored per match.
2.25 goals / match - Nafta · 0.8 goals / match - Krško
Nafta is 141% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.85 goals / match - Nafta · 2.05 goals / match - Krško
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (20 of 20 matches), while Krško keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).
Krško scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nafta
Over / Under - Krško
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.25 pts / match - Nafta · 0.9 pts / match - Krško
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 65% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Krško - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nafta
Krško
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Krško | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.10 | 2.79 | • 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 49% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 54% | • 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 30% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Krško. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nafta vs Krško?
The 2. SNL match finished Nafta 4:1 Krško. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Krško?
Nafta score 2.25 goals per game on average and Krško 0.80. The 2. SNL average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Nafta's matches and 40% of Krško's.
What form are Nafta and Krško in?
Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Krško 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Krško?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nafta vs Krško: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


