Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of 17 October 2026

Nafta vs Maribor: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
2 : 3half-time 1:2
Maribor crest
Maribor

Nafta vs Maribor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nafta played Maribor in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Nafta: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Maribor: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nafta scores 1.67 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Maribor scores 1.67 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nafta 50%, Maribor 50%. Over 2.5: Nafta 50%, Maribor 33%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.42. Nafta: 12.2 shots per match, Maribor: 10.8.

Match halves

Nafta: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00. Maribor: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

Nafta: 46-60 (3 goals). Maribor: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.50 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maribor sit top of the table and remain unbeaten after 6 rounds, recording 3 wins and 3 draws, while Nafta have a record of 2 wins, 1 draw and 3 defeats. The visitors are clearly more solid defensively: they have conceded just 3 goals this season and average 0.67 goals conceded away from home, compared with Nafta’s 2.33 goals at home and the hosts’ failure to keep a clean sheet. In their last 5 matches, Maribor collected 11 points through 3 wins and 2 draws, whereas Nafta earned 7 points and conceded 7 goals. Nafta have a better home scoring average of 2.00, compared with Maribor’s 0.67 away from home, but their low 37% possession and opponents’ xG of 1.95 point to major problems with defensive control. Maribor create chances worth an average of 1.47 xG away from home and have not lost any match on the road, making them the favourites, although three consecutive away draws increase the likelihood of a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the current form of both teams: in their last 5 matches, Nafta and Maribor each averaged 2.0 goals, while BTTS occurred in 60% of their games. Nafta has been particularly vulnerable defensively during this period, conceding 1.4 goals per match with opponents averaging as much as 2.33 xG. Maribor has stronger defensive numbers, conceding just 0.6 goals per match in their last five outings, but Nafta averages 2.67 goals per home game this season and records 5.33 shots on target. The visitors create chances consistently, as confirmed by an xG of 1.46 in their last five matches, so they should be able to exploit Nafta’s current defensive weaknesses. The main risk to the pick is Nafta’s 67% clean-sheet rate across the entire season, but Maribor’s superior attacking form shifts the forecast slightly towards both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Nafta have averaged 2.67 goals at home, with at least 2 goals scored in every home fixture so far. Maribor have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches and created chances worth 1.46 xG, while Nafta allowed opponents 2.33 xG over the same period. The hosts also currently have attacking potential of 2.0 goals per game, although Maribor’s solid defence, conceding an average of 0.6 goals in their last 5 appearances, limits the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. The projected 2.80 goals, combined with the percentages of matches featuring at least 2 goals—100% for Nafta and 67% for Maribor—provide the strongest edge on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Maribor win at full-time, as the visitors have remained unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 60% and drawing 40%, while Nafta have lost 40% of their games. Maribor were leading at the break in 60% of those matches, but their games averaged only 1.0 goal before half-time, and each of the five featured at least one second-half goal. Nafta have very strong full-season home statistics, averaging 2.67 goals scored and recording three wins from three, but their recent defensive record shows an average of 1.4 goals conceded per match, compared with 0.6 for Maribor. The visitors have recently averaged 1.4 goals scored and conceded just 0.2 after the break, which favours them settling an evenly matched first half in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
NaftaMaribor
5Shots19
NaftaMaribor
3Shots on target6
NaftaMaribor
0.85xG2.23
NaftaMaribor
1Corners8
NaftaMaribor
44Dangerous attacks84
NaftaMaribor
9Fouls15
NaftaMaribor
2Cards3
NaftaMaribor

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match1.67
NaftaMaribor
1.5Goals conceded / match0.5
NaftaMaribor
42%Average possession55%
NaftaMaribor
5.67Shots on target / match4.17
NaftaMaribor

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.17Shots per match10.83
NaftaMaribor
5.67Shots on target4.17
NaftaMaribor
13.7%Shot conversion15.4%
NaftaMaribor
42%Possession55%
NaftaMaribor
1.52xG for1.42
NaftaMaribor
2.16xG against1.1
NaftaMaribor

Shooting quality

Nafta: Counter-attackingMaribor: Efficient finishing
NaftaMaribor
Accuracy (shots on target)47%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maribor is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Nafta · 2.2 pts / match - Maribor

Nafta
WWDLL
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 2.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Maribor
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 away
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maribor is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Nafta · 0.5 goals / match - Maribor

Nafta scoring profile: mixed

Nafta scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Maribor keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

Maribor scoring profile: very strong

Maribor scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

10Goals scored (season)10
NaftaMaribor
9Goals conceded (season)3
NaftaMaribor
3.17Average goals in match2.17
NaftaMaribor
10Goals scored (last 5)10
NaftaMaribor
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
NaftaMaribor

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
NaftaMaribor
33%2 goals50%
NaftaMaribor
33%3 goals33%
NaftaMaribor
17%4 goals0%
NaftaMaribor

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
NaftaMaribor
50%2 goals0%
NaftaMaribor
17%3 goals0%
NaftaMaribor
0%4 goals0%
NaftaMaribor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
NaftaMaribor
17%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaMaribor
33%Scored in both halves33%
NaftaMaribor

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
NaftaMaribor
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
NaftaMaribor
60%BTTS - last 560%
NaftaMaribor

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
NaftaMaribor
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
NaftaMaribor
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NaftaMaribor

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
NaftaMaribor
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
NaftaMaribor
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
NaftaMaribor

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Maribor is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Nafta · 1.67 pts / match - Maribor

Nafta - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing
Maribor - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.67
NaftaMaribor
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.5
NaftaMaribor
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
NaftaMaribor
1.5Average goals (1st half)0.83
NaftaMaribor
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
NaftaMaribor
50%No goal before half-time50%
NaftaMaribor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2.17
NaftaMaribor
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
NaftaMaribor
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
NaftaMaribor
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
NaftaMaribor
33%Clean sheet after half-time83%
NaftaMaribor
50%No goal after half-time33%
NaftaMaribor

Nafta - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Maribor - second-half results

67% W17% D17% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Maribor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Maribor
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Maribor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaMaribor
Average goals in match▲ 3.172.50▼ 2.17
Both teams scored• 50%50%• 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%41%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 17%30%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%75%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%84%• 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MariborSubstitutionOn: Omar RekikOff: Cedomir Bumbic
  2. NaftaGoalLuka PoredosAssist: Shyon Omrani
  3. NaftaYellow cardAron Matyas Dragoner
  4. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Luka PihlerOff: Shyon Omrani
  5. MariborGoalTio Cipot
  6. NaftaYellow cardMátyás Vidnyánszky
  7. MariborYellow cardŽan Karničnik
  8. MariborYellow cardŽan Jevšenak
  9. MariborYellow cardNiko Osterc

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Maribor?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 2:3 Maribor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Maribor?

Nafta score 1.67 goals per game on average and Maribor 1.67. The PrvaLiga average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nafta's matches and 50% of Maribor's.

What form are Nafta and Maribor in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Maribor 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Maribor?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.