Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of 05 August 2026

Nafta vs Mura: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
5 : 2half-time 2:1
Mura crest
Mura

Nafta vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nafta played Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 5:2.

Current form

Nafta: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Mura: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nafta scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Mura scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nafta 0%, Mura 50%. Over 2.5: Nafta 50%, Mura 50%. League level: BTTS 22%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.05. Nafta: 14.5 shots per match, Mura: 8.0.

Match halves

Nafta: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Mura: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Nafta: 76-90+ (2 goals). Mura: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 22%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mura is the favorite: Nafta have lost 100% of home matches and average 0.0 goals scored per home game with 100% of home matches goalless, while Mura average 2.0 goals away and have 0% goalless away matches. In the last 5 meetings Mura have scored 9 goals and recorded 3 wins, whereas Nafta have 5 goals and a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss; Mura average 2.0 points per game in the last 5, Nafta 1.6. Nafta generate higher home xG (1.84) and average 15 shots per game (6 on target), but home conversion is 0%, indicating finishing issues. Both teams concede around 2.0 goals per game (Nafta 2.0 at home, Mura 2.0 away), but Mura’s higher efficiency (17% conversion) and no goalless games for the visitors tilt the edge in Mura’s favor.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is Nafta: at home they have a 100% clean sheet rate this season and the hosts’ seasonal BTTS is 0%, while league-wide BTTS occurs in only 22% of matches with 89% of games ending in a clean sheet. Mura, meanwhile, averages 2.0 goals per game this season and has a seasonal BTTS of 100%; in the last 5 fixtures Mura recorded BTTS in 60% of cases (Mura scored 9 goals in 5 matches versus Nafta’s 5). Offensively Mura holds the edge: xG per game 1.39 vs 0.71 for Nafta, on average 12 shots vs 4 and 4 shots on target vs 2, which increases the likelihood of the away team scoring. However, Nafta’s last 5 matches show xG of 1.7 and they concede only 0.6 goals on average, suggesting a strong home defense. Considering these signals, I favor the 'No' scenario, estimating its probability at 65% vs 35% for 'Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimated expected goals as the average of home attack xG and away defense xG: Nafta (0.71 + 1.57)/2 = 1.14, Mura (1.39 + 1.51)/2 = 1.45, total 2.59. For a Poisson distribution with a sum of 2.59, the probability of over 1.5 goals (>=2) is about 73%, over 2.5 (>=3) ~48%, and over 3.5 (>=4) ~26%. Mura scores on average 2.0 goals per match this season, averages 12.0 shots and 4.0 on target, and has BTTS 100% in away games, which increases the likelihood of more goals. Nafta at home has 100% clean sheets this season, averages only 4.0 shots with 2.0 on target and a low attacking xG of 0.71, but their xG against of 1.51 indicates a risk of conceding; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 with a 73% probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The visitors (Mura) are the favorites: their average xG is 1.39 versus Nafta’s 0.71, and their average shots are 12 versus 4, which demonstrates a clear offensive advantage for Mura. In the last five matches Mura led at the break in 80% of games (4 of 5) and scored seven first-half goals, while Nafta had only two such goals, so the visitors more often score in the first half. Nafta, however, has a seasonal average of 0.0 goals conceded at HT and 100% clean sheets at Half-Time (1 of 1), whereas Mura concedes an average of 2.0 goals per match, which may limit the margin of the home side’s defeat. Overall, considering xG, 12 vs 4 shots and Mura’s 80% share of leads at the break, the most likely scenario is 2/2 (50%); an alternative is a draw at half-time and a Mura comeback to win X/2 (12%); other outcomes carry lower probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
NaftaMura
9Shots19
NaftaMura
8Shots on target10
NaftaMura
1.37xG2.62
NaftaMura
0Corners5
NaftaMura
32Dangerous attacks100
NaftaMura
10Fouls12
NaftaMura
2Cards1
NaftaMura

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.5
NaftaMura
1Goals conceded / match1
NaftaMura
45%Average possession35%
NaftaMura
7Shots on target / match3
NaftaMura

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.5Shots per match8
NaftaMura
7Shots on target3
NaftaMura
10.3%Shot conversion18.8%
NaftaMura
45%Possession35%
NaftaMura
1.83xG for1.05
NaftaMura
1.96xG against1.54
NaftaMura

Shooting quality

Nafta: AttackingMura: Counter-attacking
NaftaMura
Accuracy (shots on target)48%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mura is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Nafta · 2 pts / match - Mura

Nafta
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Mura
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta scoring profile: mixed

Nafta scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Mura scoring profile: very strong

Mura scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)3
NaftaMura
2Goals conceded (season)2
NaftaMura
2.5Average goals in match2.5
NaftaMura
3Goals scored (last 5)3
NaftaMura
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
NaftaMura

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
NaftaMura
50%2 goals50%
NaftaMura
50%3 goals0%
NaftaMura
0%4 goals0%
NaftaMura

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
NaftaMura
50%2 goals50%
NaftaMura
0%3 goals0%
NaftaMura
0%4 goals0%
NaftaMura

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
NaftaMura
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaMura
50%Scored in both halves50%
NaftaMura

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
NaftaMura
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NaftaMura
0%BTTS - last 550%
NaftaMura

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
NaftaMura
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
NaftaMura
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NaftaMura

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
NaftaMura
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
NaftaMura
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
NaftaMura

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mura is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Nafta · 3 pts / match - Mura

Nafta - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Mura - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)3
NaftaMura
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
NaftaMura
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
NaftaMura
1Average goals (1st half)1
NaftaMura
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
NaftaMura
50%No goal before half-time0%
NaftaMura

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.5
NaftaMura
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
NaftaMura
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
NaftaMura
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
NaftaMura
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NaftaMura
50%No goal after half-time50%
NaftaMura

Nafta - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mura - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mura
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.96
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Mura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaMura
Average goals in match 2.502.33 2.50
Both teams scored 0%22% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 50%
Clean sheets 50%44% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%89% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%78% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.33
Average goals per match
22%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+-38%
Home attack advantage
+-62%
Home defence advantage
+-22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaftaYellow cardAleks Pihler
  2. NaftaSubstitutionOn: André Monteiro FerreiraOff: Luka Kambič
  3. NaftaGoalLuka Pihler
  4. MuraYellow cardAljaž Zalaznik
  5. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Shyon OmraniOff: Luka Pihler
  6. NaftaYellow cardRok Pirtovšek
  7. MuraSubstitutionOn: Florjan JevšenakOff: Aljaž Zalaznik
  8. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Michael OgwucheOff: Kimi Lavrencic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Mura?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 5:2 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Mura?

Nafta score 1.50 goals per game on average and Mura 1.50. The PrvaLiga average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Nafta's matches and 50% of Mura's.

What form are Nafta and Mura in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Mura 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Mura?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.