Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of 18 October 2026

Nafta vs Radomlje: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Radomlje crest
Radomlje

Nafta vs Radomlje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nafta played Radomlje in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Nafta: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Radomlje: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nafta scores 1.71 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Radomlje scores 1.17 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nafta 57%, Radomlje 67%. Over 2.5: Nafta 57%, Radomlje 67%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Radomlje has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.42. Nafta: 11.1 shots per match, Radomlje: 11.8.

Match halves

Nafta: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. Radomlje: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Nafta: 46-60 (4 goals). Radomlje: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Radomlje arrive in significantly better form: they have collected 7 points from their last five matches, while Nafta have managed only 4, with the visitors’ goal difference over that period standing at 16:6 compared with the hosts’ 9:8. Radomlje are unbeaten away from home, recording 50% wins and 50% draws, whereas Nafta have lost 75% of their home matches. The visitors average 2.5 goals per away game with a 24% conversion rate, while Nafta concede as many as 2.5 goals per home match and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Both teams have identical attacking xG averages of 1.41, but Radomlje control games more effectively, with 51% possession compared with Nafta’s 37%, and allow chances with a lower xG: 1.74 versus 2.02. The hosts are capable of scoring 2 goals per home match, so this could be an open game, but the more reliable defence and current attacking efficiency point to a Radomlje win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is supported by 100% of Radomlje’s matches featuring goals from both teams, while Nafta has recorded this outcome in 50% of its games. Over their last five matches, both teams had a 60% BTTS rate, with their average goals scored standing at 1.8 for Nafta and as high as 3.2 for Radomlje. Nafta conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period, while its average xG conceded is a high 2.17, clearly increasing the visitors’ chances of scoring. The hosts have been less effective across the season, averaging just 0.5 goals and failing to score in 50% of their matches, but they create chances worth 1.71 xG and average 4 shots on target. Radomlje have kept no clean sheets this season and allow opponents an average of 1.74 xG, making it more likely that Nafta will also find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Radomlje have been involved in very open games: they have averaged 2.5 goals per match so far, with every game clearing both the 1.5 and 2.5 goal lines. Nafta have scored just 0.5 goals per game this season, but their average xG stands at 1.71, while Radomlje concede an average of 1.5 goals and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Over the last five matches, both teams have shown strong attacking output: Nafta averaged 1.8 goals, while Radomlje scored as many as 3.2 goals per game. The 2.5 line also has some support, having been covered in 60% of Nafta’s recent matches and 80% of Radomlje’s, but Over 1.5 is clearly the safer choice. The projected total of 3.20 goals is primarily driven by the visitors’ attacking form and both teams’ vulnerability at the back.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Radomlje leading at the break and securing the win, as the visitors have won the first half in 2 of their 2 matches so far, while Nafta have lost it in 3 of 4 games. Radomlje score an average of 1.5 goals before half-time and have not conceded in this period, whereas Nafta score just 0.25 goals and concede 1.25. Over the season as a whole, the visitors remain unbeaten, recording a 50% win rate and 50% draw rate, while the hosts have lost 75% of their matches and average just 0.5 goals per game. Radomlje’s attacking edge is also evident in their conversion rate: despite registering a similar average of 4 shots on target per match, they convert 24% of their attempts into goals, compared with Nafta’s 4%. The hosts may improve after the interval, having averaged 1.0 goal in the second half across their last five matches, but their poor starts make a turnaround less likely than the visitors maintaining their lead. Overall, the most appealing HT/FT pick is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
NaftaRadomlje
14Shots10
NaftaRadomlje
8Shots on target3
NaftaRadomlje
1.84xG1.47
NaftaRadomlje
5Corners5
NaftaRadomlje
56Dangerous attacks88
NaftaRadomlje
8Fouls11
NaftaRadomlje
0Cards3
NaftaRadomlje

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.71Goals scored / match1.17
NaftaRadomlje
1.71Goals conceded / match1.67
NaftaRadomlje
41%Average possession53%
NaftaRadomlje
5.29Shots on target / match3.83
NaftaRadomlje

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.14Shots per match11.83
NaftaRadomlje
5.29Shots on target3.83
NaftaRadomlje
15.4%Shot conversion9.9%
NaftaRadomlje
41%Possession53%
NaftaRadomlje
1.42xG for1.62
NaftaRadomlje
2.17xG against1.54
NaftaRadomlje

Shooting quality

Nafta: Counter-attackingRadomlje: Balanced
NaftaRadomlje
Accuracy (shots on target)47%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Radomlje is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Nafta · 1 pts / match - Radomlje

Nafta
WDLLL
Season result split
29% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
LWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 2.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Radomlje
DLWLD
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

1.71 goals / match - Nafta · 1.17 goals / match - Radomlje

Nafta scoring profile: very strong

Nafta scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Radomlje keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Radomlje scoring profile: very strong

Radomlje scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

12Goals scored (season)7
NaftaRadomlje
12Goals conceded (season)10
NaftaRadomlje
3.43Average goals in match2.83
NaftaRadomlje
9Goals scored (last 5)7
NaftaRadomlje
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
NaftaRadomlje

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal67%
NaftaRadomlje
43%2 goals33%
NaftaRadomlje
29%3 goals17%
NaftaRadomlje
14%4 goals0%
NaftaRadomlje

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal83%
NaftaRadomlje
57%2 goals67%
NaftaRadomlje
29%3 goals17%
NaftaRadomlje
0%4 goals0%
NaftaRadomlje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time17%
NaftaRadomlje
29%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaRadomlje
43%Scored in both halves17%
NaftaRadomlje

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
NaftaRadomlje
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NaftaRadomlje
80%BTTS - last 580%
NaftaRadomlje

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
NaftaRadomlje
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
NaftaRadomlje
43%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
NaftaRadomlje

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
NaftaRadomlje
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
NaftaRadomlje
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
NaftaRadomlje

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Radomlje is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Nafta · 1.17 pts / match - Radomlje

Nafta - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing
Radomlje - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.17
NaftaRadomlje
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.67
NaftaRadomlje
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
NaftaRadomlje
1.71Average goals (1st half)1.5
NaftaRadomlje
29%Clean sheet before half-time50%
NaftaRadomlje
43%No goal before half-time50%
NaftaRadomlje

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1
NaftaRadomlje
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
NaftaRadomlje
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
NaftaRadomlje
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.33
NaftaRadomlje
29%Clean sheet after half-time33%
NaftaRadomlje
43%No goal after half-time67%
NaftaRadomlje

Nafta - second-half results

43% W14% D43% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Radomlje - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Radomlje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Radomlje
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
122%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Radomlje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaRadomlje
Average goals in match▲ 3.432.56▲ 2.83
Both teams scored▲ 57%50%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%41%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 14%29%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%74%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%85%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RadomljeYellow cardDivine Igwe Ikenna
  2. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Mátyás VidnyánszkyOff: Anis Jašaragič
  3. RadomljeSubstitutionOn: Josip BalićOff: Jaša Jelen
  4. RadomljeSubstitutionOn: Mamadou Saydou BanguraOff: Jaša Martinčič
  5. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Luka PihlerOff: Amadej Maroša
  6. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Tibor Gorenc StankovičOff: Kimi Lavrencic
  7. RadomljeYellow cardMamadou Saydou Bangura
  8. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Umar Olasunkanmi JamiuOff: Shyon Omrani
  9. RadomljeYellow cardAntonio Bosec

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Radomlje?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 3:1 Radomlje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Radomlje?

Nafta score 1.71 goals per game on average and Radomlje 1.17. The PrvaLiga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Nafta's matches and 67% of Radomlje's.

What form are Nafta and Radomlje in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Radomlje 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Radomlje?

The statistical background for Nafta vs Radomlje — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.