Nafta vs Triglav: match statistics
Nafta vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nafta play Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Nafta: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nafta scores 2.17 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nafta 60%, Triglav 37%. Over 2.5: Nafta 47%, Triglav 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.60. Nafta: 12.3 shots per match, Triglav: 14.0.
Match halves
Nafta: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.23. Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33.
Goals by minute
Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Nafta holds a clear advantage at home: they have won 86% of home matches and remain unbeaten there, averaging 2.57 goals per game with 0% of matches without scoring. Triglav shows a strong season-long offense (71 goals scored versus Nafta’s 64) and has netted 10 goals in the last 5 matches compared to the hosts’ 8, but on the road they average 2.14 goals and have 14% of away matches without a goal. Both teams are similarly solid defensively — conceding 0.86 goals per game on average — and xG is 1.73 for Triglav versus 1.72 for Nafta, indicating comparable quality of created chances. Nafta is more efficient at home: shot conversion is 19% with an average of 5.64 shots on target per game, while Triglav converts 16% with 5.21 shots on target, giving the hosts a higher likelihood of turning chances into goals. Considering Nafta’s 0% home defeats, higher home goal average (2.57) and slightly better conversion, I forecast a home win; I propose probability distribution of 60% home, 20% draw and 20% away.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nafta | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - Nafta · 2.4 goals / match - Triglav
Nafta is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Nafta · 0.93 goals / match - Triglav
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Nafta
Over / Under — Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.03 pts / match - Nafta · 1.8 pts / match - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nafta
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Nafta | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.93 | 2.82 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 28% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nafta 1 - 0 - 0 Triglav. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nafta vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Nafta 1:1 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Triglav?
Nafta score 2.17 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.40. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nafta's matches and 37% of Triglav's.
What form are Nafta and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Triglav 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Triglav?
The statistical background for Nafta vs Triglav — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.