Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger: match statistics
Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Naga World played Cambodia Tiger in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Naga World: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Cambodia Tiger: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Naga World scores 1.50 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Cambodia Tiger scores 2.33 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Naga World 58%, Cambodia Tiger 54%. Over 2.5: Naga World 50%, Cambodia Tiger 71%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Cambodia Tiger has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.80. Naga World: 15.3 shots per match, Cambodia Tiger: 14.9.
Match halves
Naga World: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Cambodia Tiger: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Naga World: 76-90+ (9 goals). Cambodia Tiger: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Cambodian League: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2) — Cambodia Tiger hold a clear offensive edge, scoring 56 goals this season versus Naga World’s 36. Away, the visitors average 2.08 goals per match while the hosts score 1.5 at home; additionally the visitors’ shot conversion is 18% versus the hosts’ 10%, increasing their efficiency despite fewer attempts (11.83 shots per match vs 14.75 for the hosts). Naga World do have strong defensive credentials at home — conceding only 1.08 goals per home match compared to Cambodia’s 1.58 away — and register more shots on target (6 vs 4.42), suggesting game control (51% possession vs 44% for the visitors). Note the xG: hosts have a home xG of 1.82 with an actual 1.5 goals scored, indicating poor finishing, whereas the visitors have an xG of 1.47 with 2.08 goals scored, showing Cambodia frequently converts chances above expectation. Both teams are in similar form (1.6 points per match over the last 5 and a 2-2-1 record), so the visitors’ superior finishing and higher goal output give them a small predictive edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators favor a both-teams-to-score scenario: Naga World has BTTS 50%, Cambodia Tiger 58%, with a league average of 55%. Offensively Naga averages 2.58 goals scored with xG 2.12 and 17.92 shots per match; Cambodia records 2.08 goals with xG 1.47 and 11.83 shots. In the last 5 matches visitors generated 2.53 xG versus 1.53 for hosts. Both teams also concede regularly: seasonally Naga 1.17 and Cambodia 1.58; in the last 5 Naga conceded 7 goals (1.4 avg) and Cambodia 5 goals (1.0 avg), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally, matches over 2.5 goals are frequent (67% for hosts and 75% for guests) and the over 2.5 + BTTS combination occurs in 42% of hosts’ matches and 50% of guests’ matches. Considering seasonal BTTS 50%/58%, last 5 matches 40%/60% and 11 away goals vs 6 home goals in the last 5, I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 66% versus 34%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal data show Naga World scores an average of 2.58 goals per match and Cambodia Tiger 2.08, with more reliable xG figures of 2.12 (Naga) and 1.47 (Cambodia). A simple model combining the team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG yields 1.72 expected goals for Naga World and 1.43 for Cambodia Tiger, totaling 3.15 goals in the match. Historically both teams frequently clear the lines: Over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Naga’s matches and 92% of Cambodia’s, while Over 2.5 occurred in 67% and 75% of cases. In the last 5 matches Naga scored 6 goals (avg. 1.2) and Cambodia 11 (avg. 2.2), which further confirms the visitors’ scoring form. Considering average shots on target of 5.92 (Naga) and 4.42 (Cambodia) and conversion rates of 14% and 18%, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to back Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics indicate an advantage for the visitors in the first half: average goals at the break are 1.25 for Cambodia Tiger versus 0.92 for Naga World, and a lead at the break occurred in 58% of the visitors' matches versus 50% for the hosts. After the break the situation shifts in favor of Naga World — the average goals in second halves are 1.67 (hosts) versus 0.83 (visitors), and the hosts scored 9 goals in minutes 46–60 compared to 3 goals for the visitors in that interval, indicating a strong potential for a turnaround. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 2.12 versus 1.47 for the visitors, and shot metrics of 17.92 shots vs. 11.83 and 5.92 shots on target vs. 4.42 confirm Naga World’s offensive pressure after the break. Considering the frequency of goals after the break in the league (85% of matches feature second-half goals) and the fact that visitors more often lead at the break (58%), the most likely scenario from the data is a visitors’ lead at half-time and a hosts’ victory after 90 minutes (2/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Naga World | Cambodia Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cambodia Tiger is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Naga World · 1.6 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambodia Tiger is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Naga World · 2.33 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger
Naga World is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Naga World · 1.38 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger
Naga World scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Cambodia Tiger keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
Cambodia Tiger scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Naga World keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naga World
Over / Under - Cambodia Tiger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambodia Tiger is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Naga World · 1.83 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naga World - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cambodia Tiger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Naga World
Cambodia Tiger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).
Teams vs league
| Naga World | Liga | Cambodia Tiger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.54 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 70% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 83% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Naga World 2 - 0 - 0 Cambodia Tiger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger?
The Cambodian League match finished Naga World 1:3 Cambodia Tiger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Naga World and Cambodia Tiger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Naga World won 2, Cambodia Tiger won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger?
Naga World score 1.50 goals per game on average and Cambodia Tiger 2.33. The Cambodian League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Naga World's matches and 54% of Cambodia Tiger's.
What form are Naga World and Cambodia Tiger in?
Over the last 5 games Naga World have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cambodia Tiger 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger?
The statistical background for Naga World vs Cambodia Tiger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


