Nakhon Ratchasima vs Chiangrai United: match statistics
Chiangrai United seems to be the favorite for this matchup despite playing away from home. Nakhon Ratchasima is displaying disastrous form, occupying 16th place in the table with a mere 18% home win rate and a staggering 64% loss rate at their own stadium. In their last five matches, the hosts have averaged just 0.6 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. Chiangrai United, although drawing 67% of their away games, consistently finds the back of the net (0% FTS%) and boasts significantly better efficiency (14% shot conversion compared to the hosts' 6%). The gap in offensive quality is clear - the visitors score an average of 1.5 goals away, whereas Nakhon Ratchasima manages only 0.64 goals at home. Given the hosts' weak defense (averaging 1.27 goals conceded in home matches) and Chiangrai's tendency to draw, I expect an away win or potentially a share of the points.
Nakhon Ratchasima vs Chiangrai United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nakhon Ratchasima played Chiangrai United in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The match was played on 13 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Nakhon Ratchasima: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chiangrai United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nakhon Ratchasima scores 0.64 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Chiangrai United scores 1.27 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nakhon Ratchasima 36%, Chiangrai United 68%. Over 2.5: Nakhon Ratchasima 45%, Chiangrai United 36%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Chiangrai United has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.21. Nakhon Ratchasima: 9.4 shots per match, Chiangrai United: 11.5.
Match halves
Nakhon Ratchasima: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.36. Chiangrai United: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Nakhon Ratchasima: 76-90+ (4 goals). Chiangrai United: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Thai League T1: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chiangrai United seems to be the favorite for this matchup despite playing away from home. Nakhon Ratchasima is displaying disastrous form, occupying 16th place in the table with a mere 18% home win rate and a staggering 64% loss rate at their own stadium. In their last five matches, the hosts have averaged just 0.6 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. Chiangrai United, although drawing 67% of their away games, consistently finds the back of the net (0% FTS%) and boasts significantly better efficiency (14% shot conversion compared to the hosts' 6%). The gap in offensive quality is clear - the visitors score an average of 1.5 goals away, whereas Nakhon Ratchasima manages only 0.64 goals at home. Given the hosts' weak defense (averaging 1.27 goals conceded in home matches) and Chiangrai's tendency to draw, I expect an away win or potentially a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nakhon Ratchasima | Chiangrai United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chiangrai United is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Nakhon Ratchasima · 1.2 pts / match - Chiangrai United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chiangrai United is 98% better for: goals scored per match.
0.64 goals / match - Nakhon Ratchasima · 1.27 goals / match - Chiangrai United
Chiangrai United is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Nakhon Ratchasima · 1.41 goals / match - Chiangrai United
Nakhon Ratchasima scores in 41% of matches (9 of 22 matches), while Chiangrai United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
Chiangrai United scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Nakhon Ratchasima keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nakhon Ratchasima
Over / Under - Chiangrai United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chiangrai United is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Nakhon Ratchasima · 1.64 pts / match - Chiangrai United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nakhon Ratchasima - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chiangrai United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nakhon Ratchasima
Chiangrai United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).
Teams vs league
| Nakhon Ratchasima | Liga | Chiangrai United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.36 | 2.76 | • 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 57% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Nakhon Ratchasima 0 - 0 - 1 Chiangrai United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nakhon Ratchasima vs Chiangrai United?
The Thai League T1 match finished Nakhon Ratchasima 1:1 Chiangrai United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nakhon Ratchasima vs Chiangrai United?
Nakhon Ratchasima score 0.64 goals per game on average and Chiangrai United 1.27. The Thai League T1 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Nakhon Ratchasima's matches and 68% of Chiangrai United's.
What form are Nakhon Ratchasima and Chiangrai United in?
Over the last 5 games Nakhon Ratchasima have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chiangrai United 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nakhon Ratchasima vs Chiangrai United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.