Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour: match statistics
Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Namdhari played Diamond Harbour in I-League (India). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 4:5.
Current form
Namdhari: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Diamond Harbour: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Namdhari scores 1.17 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Diamond Harbour scores 1.50 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Namdhari 83%, Diamond Harbour 67%. Over 2.5: Namdhari 17%, Diamond Harbour 50%. League level: BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Namdhari has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.33. Namdhari: 10.2 shots per match, Diamond Harbour: 8.5.
Match halves
Namdhari: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Diamond Harbour: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Namdhari: 76-90+ (3 goals). Diamond Harbour: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 68%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Diamond Harbour is the clear favorite by the numbers: they are 1st, have won 4 of 6 matches this season and 4 of their last 5, averaging 2.6 pts per match over that span, while Namdhari has just 1 win this season and 1.2 pts per match in their last five. The visitors score 1.75 goals on average away with a shot accuracy of 19% and 4.25 shots on target per game; the hosts at home attempt far more shots (20) and register 6 SOT per match with a higher xG (2.07 vs 1.39), but convert at only 5% and therefore average just 1 goal per home game. Defensively Diamond Harbour concedes 0.75 goals away versus 1.0 conceded by Namdhari at home, and the visitors have 75% away wins and only 25% draws, indicating greater efficiency in actual results than xG would suggest. Namdhari’s home stats show 100% draws and 4 draws in 6 matches this season, so a share of points is possible, but given form (4 wins in last 5), superior finishing and lower away goals conceded, I tip a Diamond Harbour win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because both teams show strong goal signals: Namdhari have 50% of matches with both teams scoring this season and 80% in the last 5, while Diamond Harbour have 75% this season and 80% in the last 5. Namdhari have no clean sheets this season (0%) and average 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded per match this season; in the last 5 they scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 per match). Diamond Harbour display better offensive metrics: 1.75 goals on average this season and xG 1.39 vs 1.18 for Namdhari; in the last 5 they scored 9 and conceded 4 (1.8 and 0.8). The difference in chance creation also supports goals at both ends — average shots on target 2.5 vs 4.25 and conversion rate 13% vs 19% indicate Diamond Harbour create and convert more chances. With a league BTTS rate of 67% and both teams at 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches, the 'yes' scenario is the strongest.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts a total of approximately 2.70 goals: home xG 1.18, away xG 1.39, which estimates about 1.30 goals for Namdhari and 1.40 for Diamond Harbour. The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 — Diamond Harbour has 100% of matches over 1.5, Namdhari 50%, and the combined expected goals of 2.70 plus the fact that in the last 5 matches for both teams both sides scored in 80% of cases elevate the probability of Over 1.5 to 88%. For the 2.5 line the situation is more balanced: on the season both teams have 50% of matches over 2.5 and the league records 43% such games, but in the last 5 matches there is 20% Over 2.5 for the home side and 60% for the away side; additionally Diamond Harbour averages 4.25 shots on target with a 19% conversion rate versus Namdhari’s 2.5 SOT and 13% conversion, therefore I assign 62% to Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely: seasonally both teams have 0% of matches above 3.5 (100% below), and the projected 2.70 goals is clearly below 3.5, so I rate Over 3.5 at 15%. In summary, I recommend backing Over 1.5 (over, line 1.5) as the strongest and most reliable signal, based on the combined xG 2.57 (1.18+1.39), the away form and the high percentage of matches with goals from both teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The visitors are clear favorites: they have a 75% win rate this season and 80% win rate in the last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.75 goals per game versus the hosts' 1.0, with an xG of 1.39 compared to Namdhari’s 1.18. At Half-Time statistics indicate low scoring and frequent draws — average goals at Half-Time are only 0.5 per team (scoredAVGHT_home 0.5, scoredAVGHT_away 0.5), and a draw at the break occurs in 50% of the hosts’ matches and 75% of the visitors’ matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home 50%, drawingAtHTPercentage_away 75%). The visitors register on average 4.25 shots on target vs 2.5 for the hosts and have higher conversion (19% vs 13%), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in the second half. In the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 40% of cases (last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_away 40%), so a Half-Time draw with a Full-Time win for the visitors is most consistent with the data, hence the pick X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Namdhari | Diamond Harbour | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Diamond Harbour is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Namdhari · 2.6 pts / match - Diamond Harbour
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Diamond Harbour is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Namdhari · 1.5 goals / match - Diamond Harbour
Diamond Harbour is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Namdhari · 0.83 goals / match - Diamond Harbour
Namdhari scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Diamond Harbour keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Diamond Harbour scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Namdhari keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Namdhari
Over / Under - Diamond Harbour
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Diamond Harbour is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Namdhari · 1.67 pts / match - Diamond Harbour
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Namdhari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Diamond Harbour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Namdhari
Diamond Harbour
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Namdhari | Liga | Diamond Harbour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.55 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 68% | • 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 19% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 68% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour?
The I-League match finished Namdhari 4:5 Diamond Harbour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour?
Namdhari score 1.17 goals per game on average and Diamond Harbour 1.50. The I-League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Namdhari's matches and 67% of Diamond Harbour's.
What form are Namdhari and Diamond Harbour in?
Over the last 5 games Namdhari have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Diamond Harbour 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour?
The statistical background for Namdhari vs Diamond Harbour — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.