Namungo vs Geita Gold: match statistics
Namungo vs Geita Gold: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Namungo played Geita Gold in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 18 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Namungo: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Geita Gold: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Namungo scores 1.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Geita Gold scores 1.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Namungo 100%, Geita Gold 0%. Over 2.5: Namungo 100%, Geita Gold 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Geita Gold has higher xG: 1.14 vs 0.79. Namungo: 2.0 shots per match, Geita Gold: 7.0.
Match halves
Namungo: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Geita Gold: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Namungo: 76-90+ (1 goals). Geita Gold: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Namungo remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Geita Gold have lost as many as 4 of their last 5 games. The hosts have scored 6 goals during this period—three times more than the visitors, who have found the net only 2 times. Defensive performance is equally important: Namungo have conceded 4 goals in their last five appearances, compared with 10 for Geita Gold, significantly increasing the hosts’ chances of creating decisive opportunities. The points return over the last five rounds stands at 1.8 per game for Namungo, versus just 0.2 for their opponents. Namungo’s run of three consecutive draws slightly reduces confidence in a high-margin victory, but the difference in current attacking efficiency and defensive stability points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Geita Gold’s weak attack: in their last 5 matches, the team scored only 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game, with an xG of just 0.64. Namungo conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match during this period, so the data does not suggest that the hosts will regularly allow such an inefficient opponent to score. At the same time, Geita Gold conceded 10 goals in 5 appearances, while Namungo created chances worth an average of 1.99 xG, clearly increasing the likelihood that the hosts will score at least once. Although BTTS landed in 60% of Namungo’s last matches and 40% of Geita Gold’s games, the hosts’ attacking quality advantage over the visitors’ offense more strongly supports a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The latest form clearly favors Namungo: the hosts have scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches, while Geita Gold have managed just 2. Although the visitors have conceded an average of 2.0 goals per game, their own xG stands at only 0.64, limiting the likelihood of an open, high-scoring game with goals at both ends. Namungo’s xG over this period is 1.99, while they have conceded just 4 goals in 5 appearances, making a controlled home result the most likely outcome. Only 40% of each team’s last matches went over the 2.5-goal line, while the 3.5 line provides an additional safety margin. The projected total of 2.10 goals indicates that Under 3.5 has by far the strongest support in the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Namungo win, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 75% for Geita Gold. The opening phase should be cautious: Namungo averaged 0.6 goals before half-time, while the visitors managed just 0.25. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage increases significantly, as they conceded only 0.2 goals per match during the second half, whereas Geita Gold conceded an average of 1.25. Recent full-time form also strongly favours Namungo: the team are unbeaten in their last five matches and average 1.8 points per game, while Geita Gold have lost four of their last five matches and scored just 0.4 goals per game.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Namungo | Geita Gold | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 100% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.40 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Namungo scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Geita Gold keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
Geita Gold scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Namungo
Over / Under - Geita Gold
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Geita Gold is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Namungo · 3 pts / match - Geita Gold
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Namungo - second-half results
Concedes 3.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Geita Gold - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Namungo
Geita Gold
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Namungo | Liga | Geita Gold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 44% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 28% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Namungo vs Geita Gold?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Namungo 1:0 Geita Gold. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Namungo vs Geita Gold?
Namungo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Geita Gold 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Namungo's matches and 0% of Geita Gold's.
What form are Namungo and Geita Gold in?
Over the last 5 games Namungo have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Geita Gold 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namungo vs Geita Gold?
The statistical background for Namungo vs Geita Gold — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


