France - Ligue 2Stade Marcel-PicotData current as of 15 October 2026

Nancy vs Montpellier: match statistics

Nancy crest
Nancy
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Montpellier crest
Montpellier

Nancy vs Montpellier: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nancy played Montpellier in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Venue: Stade Marcel-Picot. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Nancy: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Montpellier: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nancy scores 0.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Montpellier scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nancy 0%, Montpellier 100%. Over 2.5: Nancy 0%, Montpellier 0%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Montpellier has higher xG: 2.51 vs 1.27. Nancy: 12.0 shots per match, Montpellier: 27.0.

Match halves

Nancy: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Montpellier: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Nancy: 0-15 (0 goals). Montpellier: 76-90+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montpellier have shown clearly stronger form across their last five matches, scoring 14 goals—an average of 2.8 per game—and winning 3 times. Nancy remain unbeaten during this period, but as many as 4 of their 5 matches ended in draws, while their tally of 8 goals is noticeably lower. The hosts are, however, better organised defensively, conceding just 3 goals compared with Montpellier’s 9, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested match. Despite this defensive advantage, the visitors have averaged 1.2 more goals per game and earned 2.0 points per match compared with the hosts’ 1.4. Montpellier are therefore marginally more likely to win, although Nancy’s high number of draws means that a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is primarily supported by Montpellier’s current form, with the team scoring an average of 2.8 goals in its last 5 matches while also conceding 1.8. Nancy scored 1.6 goals per game during this period, with an average xG of 1.83, indicating genuine potential to exploit gaps in the opposition’s defence. Montpellier recorded BTTS in 80% of its last five appearances, while Nancy saw this scenario in 40%; however, the hosts allowed opponents just 0.38 xG and conceded 3 goals in total. This limits confidence in the selection, as Nancy’s solid defence could keep the visitors at bay. Nevertheless, Montpellier’s 14 goals in its last 5 matches suggest that, if they concede, they should be capable of responding. The “Yes” pick is therefore marginally stronger than the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Recent form points to a game with goals, but not necessarily a very high-scoring one: Nancy have scored an average of 1.6 goals in their last 5 matches, while Montpellier have averaged 2.8. However, the hosts are very well organised without the ball, having conceded just 3 goals during this period, or 0.6 per game, with an average xG against of only 0.38. Montpellier concede an average of 1.8 goals per game, but their average xG against stands at 1.02, lowering Nancy’s projection to around 1.45 goals. The projected total of 2.65 goals is above the league average of 2.22, but remains clearly below the four-goal threshold. Therefore, the strongest edge is on Under 3.5, supported by 60% of Nancy’s matches and 40% of Montpellier’s matches in the last 5 rounds ending with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Montpellier are showing clearly superior current attacking efficiency, averaging 2.8 goals scored over their last five matches compared with Nancy’s 1.6. The visitors won 60% of those games and held a lead at the break in 50% of them, while Nancy were level at half-time in 67% of cases and scored just 0.33 goals per match before the interval. Nancy are nevertheless difficult to beat, having avoided defeat in their last five outings, recording as many as 80% draws and conceding an average of only 0.6 goals. The strongest HT/FT scenario nonetheless remains Montpellier leading at half-time and securing the final victory, as the visitors hold a significant attacking advantage, with their average of 1.25 goals before the break clearly exceeding Nancy’s 0.33. A similarly credible alternative is a draw at half-time followed by a Montpellier win, given the hosts’ cautious profile during the opening 45 minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
NancyMontpellier
16Shots13
NancyMontpellier
5Shots on target4
NancyMontpellier
1.78xG1.39
NancyMontpellier
6Corners6
NancyMontpellier
58Dangerous attacks40
NancyMontpellier
18Fouls27
NancyMontpellier
2Cards5
NancyMontpellier

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals conceded / match1
NancyMontpellier
62%Average possession56%
NancyMontpellier
2Shots on target / match6
NancyMontpellier

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match27
NancyMontpellier
2Shots on target6
NancyMontpellier
0%Shot conversion3.7%
NancyMontpellier
62%Possession56%
NancyMontpellier
1.27xG for2.51
NancyMontpellier
0.55xG against1.31
NancyMontpellier

Shooting quality

Nancy: BalancedMontpellier: Dominant
NancyMontpellier
Accuracy (shots on target)17%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.09
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nancy
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 0.55BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Montpellier
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.51Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nancy scoring profile: mixed

Nancy scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Montpellier keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Montpellier scoring profile: mixed

Montpellier scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Nancy keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

0Goals scored (season)1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals conceded (season)1
NancyMontpellier
0Average goals in match2
NancyMontpellier
0Goals scored (last 5)1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals conceded (last 5)1
NancyMontpellier

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
NancyMontpellier
0%2 goals0%
NancyMontpellier
0%3 goals0%
NancyMontpellier
0%4 goals0%
NancyMontpellier

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
NancyMontpellier
0%2 goals0%
NancyMontpellier
0%3 goals0%
NancyMontpellier
0%4 goals0%
NancyMontpellier

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
NancyMontpellier
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NancyMontpellier
0%Scored in both halves0%
NancyMontpellier

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
NancyMontpellier
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NancyMontpellier
0%BTTS - last 5100%
NancyMontpellier

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
NancyMontpellier
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
NancyMontpellier
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NancyMontpellier

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NancyMontpellier
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
NancyMontpellier
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NancyMontpellier

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nancy - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Montpellier - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals scored (1st half)0
NancyMontpellier
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
NancyMontpellier
0Average goals (1st half)0
NancyMontpellier
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
NancyMontpellier
100%No goal before half-time100%
NancyMontpellier

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
NancyMontpellier
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
NancyMontpellier
0Average goals (2nd half)2
NancyMontpellier
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
NancyMontpellier
100%No goal after half-time0%
NancyMontpellier

Nancy - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montpellier - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nancy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Montpellier - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nancy
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Montpellier
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
45%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+300%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nancy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Montpellier

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

NancyLigaMontpellier
Average goals in match▼ 0.002.22▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%44%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%44%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▲ 100%39%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%33%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▼ 0%56%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
33%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
22%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NancyYellow cardNehemiah Fernandez Veliz
  2. MontpellierYellow cardDaylam Meddah
  3. MontpellierYellow cardThéo Sainte-Luce
  4. NancySubstitutionOn: Chafik El HansarOff: Mamadou Fofana
  5. MontpellierYellow cardGrégory Ayem
  6. MontpellierSubstitutionOn: Daryll BenlahlouOff: Noah Vidal
  7. NancySubstitutionOn: Nordine KandilOff: Kouroufia Kebe
  8. MontpellierYellow cardYael Mouanga
  9. MontpellierYellow cardLacine Megnan-Pave
  10. NancyYellow cardEnzo Tacafred

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nancy 0 - 0 - 2 Montpellier. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

AS Nancy-Lorraine
0 : 3
Montpellier HSC
Montpellier HSC
4 : 1
AS Nancy-Lorraine

FAQ

What was the result of Nancy vs Montpellier?

The Ligue 2 match finished Nancy 0:1 Montpellier. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nancy and Montpellier?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nancy won 0, Montpellier won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nancy vs Montpellier?

Nancy score 0.00 goals per game on average and Montpellier 1.00. The Ligue 2 average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Nancy's matches and 100% of Montpellier's.

What form are Nancy and Montpellier in?

Over the last 5 games Nancy have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Montpellier 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nancy vs Montpellier?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nancy vs Montpellier: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.