China - China League OneData current as of 06 September 2026

Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics

Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nanjing City played Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Nanjing City: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nanjing City scores 1.00 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 1.93 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nanjing City 50%, Guangzhou E-Power 57%. Over 2.5: Nanjing City 36%, Guangzhou E-Power 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.35. Nanjing City: 12.6 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 16.6.

Match halves

Nanjing City: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.29. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Nanjing City: 31-45+ (5 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (2), primarily due to their clear superiority in efficiency and current form. Guangzhou E-Power have scored 27 goals this season versus Nanjing City’s 14, and in the last five matches they have 10 goals compared to the hosts’ 6. The visitors average 1.83 goals per away game and 4.5 shots on target per match with average possession of 56%, while Nanjing at home record 1.43 goals, 3.86 shots on target and 47% possession, so Guangzhou should control the match. However, the hosts show a solid home defence—conceding 1.00 goal per game on average and keeping a clean sheet in 43% of matches, whereas Guangzhou have no away clean sheets and an average xG against of 1.54, which indicates some risk of goals for both sides. Considering the better recent form (points per game in last 5: 2.0 for Guangzhou vs 1.2 for Nanjing) and the advantage in shots and xG (1.66 vs 1.53), I assign a higher probability to an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes as more likely. Guangzhou E-Power posts a season BTTS rate of 83% and 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals in those five games (10 goals). Nanjing City at home has a season BTTS of only 38% and a high clean sheet expected/home clean sheet rate of 63%, but their BTTS in the last 5 matches rose to 60% and they conceded on average 1.4 goals (7 conceded), which undermines home resilience. xG analysis shows the hosts with offensive xG 1.94 vs xG against 1.54, and the visitors with offensive xG 1.66 vs xG against 0.91, so both sides generate real chances. Additionally Guangzhou is more efficient in conversion (13% vs 11%) and has 67% of matches over 2.5 with concurrent BTTS, increasing the likelihood of goal exchange. The sum of these signals yields my BTTS assessment at 75% vs 25% for No Goal, hence the recommendation: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model and shot metrics indicate high goal potential: expected xG is 1.74 for Nanjing City and 1.29 for Guangzhou E-Power, totaling 3.03 goals; teams average 5.38 and 4.50 shots on target with conversion rates of 11% (Nanjing) and 13% (Guangzhou). Under a Poisson distribution with mean 3.03 the probability of over 1.5 goals is ~81%, over 2.5 is ~58%, and over 3.5 is ~36%. Seasonal rates confirm this bias: Nanjing has 75% of matches over 1.5 and 50% over 2.5, while Guangzhou has 83% and 67% respectively, with league average at 2.61 goals. In the last 5 matches Nanjing scored 1.2 and conceded 1.4 on average, Guangzhou scored 2.0 and conceded 1.2, with over 2.5 in the last 5 being 60% and 80%, increasing the likelihood of additional goals. Considering the combined xG of 3.03, high seasonal over 1.5/2.5 rates for both sides and current form, the strongest signal is to back over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1, because Nanjing City led at the break in 4 home matches (50%) and has a 75% home win efficiency, indicating an ability to maintain a lead. The hosts have a higher xG of 1.94 versus the visitors' 1.66, and in the second half they score an average of 1.13 goals while conceding 0.38 on average; in second halves they have accumulated 16 points versus the visitors' 6 points (averaging 2.0 vs 1.0 points per game). In the last 5 fixtures the hosts averaged 1.2 first-half goals versus 0.6 for opponents and have a first-half points average of 1.8 versus the visitors' 1.2, further supporting a lead at the break. The visitors, however, record both teams to score in 83% of their matches, so there is a risk of both teams scoring, which lowers the chance of a goalless or one-sided match. Taking this into account, I assign 35% to 1/1 as the most likely scenario, with smaller probabilities for X/1 (17%), X/X (13%) and 1/X (10%), and a low probability of a turnaround (1/2 5%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
6Shots6
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
3Shots on target2
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.92xG0.77
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
3Corners1
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
44Dangerous attacks33
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
18Fouls16
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
4Cards3
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
1Goals scored / match1.93
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
1.07Goals conceded / match1
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
44%Average possession56%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
3.07Shots on target / match5
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.64Shots per match16.57
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
3.07Shots on target5
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
7.9%Shot conversion11.6%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
44%Possession56%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
1.35xG for1.82
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
1.27xG against1.18
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Shooting quality

Nanjing City: BalancedGuangzhou E-Power: Dominant
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
Accuracy (shots on target)24%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Guangzhou E-Power is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Nanjing City · 2.2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Nanjing City
WLLWL
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Guangzhou E-Power
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Guangzhou E-Power is 93% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Nanjing City · 1.93 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Guangzhou E-Power is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Nanjing City · 1 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Nanjing City scoring profile: strong

Nanjing City scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

Guangzhou E-Power scoring profile: very strong

Guangzhou E-Power scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Nanjing City keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

14Goals scored (season)27
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
15Goals conceded (season)14
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
2.07Average goals in match2.93
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
21%2 goals71%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
7%3 goals36%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0%4 goals0%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal64%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
29%2 goals21%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
7%3 goals7%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0%4 goals7%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
Guangzhou E-Power - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 14 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
14%Scored in both halves43%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
60%BTTS - last 560%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Guangzhou E-Power is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Nanjing City · 1.79 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Nanjing City - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Guangzhou E-Power - half-time state
43% leading50% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.79
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.93
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.29
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
57%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
43%No goal before half-time36%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.57
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)1
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.64
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
50%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power
71%No goal after half-time36%
Nanjing CityGuangzhou E-Power

Nanjing City - second-half results

21% W36% R43% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results

36% W50% R14% P
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nanjing City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match1.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%100%
Goal difference+4-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Guangzhou E-Power - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nanjing City
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Guangzhou E-Power
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
7
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+120%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nanjing City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Guangzhou E-Power

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Nanjing CityLigaGuangzhou E-Power
Average goals in match 2.072.59 2.93
Both teams scored 50%54% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%51% 57%
Clean sheets 29%28% 36%
Goal before half-time 79%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 71%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardXueming Liang
  2. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalJoão Carlos Cardoso Santo
  3. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardKun Xiao
  4. Nanjing CityYellow cardBang An
  5. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Ousmane CamaraOff: Xueming Liang
  6. Nanjing CitySubstitutionOn: Qiwen ZhuOff: Zhaoyu Zhai
  7. Nanjing CityYellow cardLe Liu
  8. Nanjing CityYellow cardDejiang Yang
  9. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Jingbin WangOff: João Carlos Cardoso Santo
  10. Nanjing CityYellow cardXijie Wang
  11. Guangzhou E-PowerYellow cardChien-ming Wang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nanjing City 0 - 0 - 2 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Guangdong GZ-Power FC
4 : 1
Nanjing City FC
Nanjing City FC
2 : 4
Guangdong GZ-Power FC

FAQ

What was the result of Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power?

The China League One match finished Nanjing City 0:1 Guangzhou E-Power. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nanjing City and Guangzhou E-Power?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nanjing City won 0, Guangzhou E-Power won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power?

Nanjing City score 1.00 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 1.93. The China League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nanjing City's matches and 57% of Guangzhou E-Power's.

What form are Nanjing City and Guangzhou E-Power in?

Over the last 5 games Nanjing City have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nanjing City vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.