Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka: match statistics
Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nanjing City played Meizhou Hakka in China League One (China). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Nanjing City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Meizhou Hakka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nanjing City scores 0.71 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Meizhou Hakka scores 0.71 and concedes 2.29. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nanjing City 43%, Meizhou Hakka 43%. Over 2.5: Nanjing City 29%, Meizhou Hakka 86%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Nanjing City has higher xG: 1.17 vs 0.92. Nanjing City: 10.9 shots per match, Meizhou Hakka: 6.3.
Match halves
Nanjing City: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.29. Meizhou Hakka: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
Nanjing City: 31-45+ (3 goals). Meizhou Hakka: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win. Nanjing City holds a clear advantage in chance creation: average xG at home is 1.33 versus 0.72 xG for Meizhou away, and average shots on target are 3.75 per match versus just 0.5 for the visitors. The home defence performs better at their ground — Nanjing concedes 1.0 goal on average and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of matches, whereas Meizhou concedes 1.5 goals away and have shipped 11 goals in the last 5 fixtures compared to 6 conceded by Nanjing. Although Meizhou have slightly better recent point returns (1.2 pts per game vs 0.8 for Nanjing) and 2 wins in their last 5, the visitors score only 0.5 goals away and fail to score in 50% of those matches. Considering the superiority in chance creation (1.33 vs 0.72 xG), higher shots on target rate and lower average goals conceded, I give the hosts the greater probability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors BTTS - Yes. Combining xG: hosts have an attacking xG of 1.00 while their opponents concede 1.76 xG (1.38 xG on average for Nanjing), whereas Meizhou has attacking xG 0.72 and opponents concede 1.10 (0.91 xG on average for the away side). Hosts average more shots (6.8) and shots on target (2.8) with a conversion rate of 12%, while Meizhou only manage 5.0 shots and 0.5 on target with a 10% conversion, which increases the likelihood of a home goal and gives the visitors limited but realistic chances. Counterpoints are the visitors' seasonal BTTS rate of 0% and Meizhou’s 50% clean sheets; however Nanjing have no clean sheets (0% CS) and concede 2.6 goals per match on average, which significantly raises the probability that the away side will also score. Additionally, the hosts’ seasonal BTTS is 60%, the league average is 45%, and both teams produced BTTS in 40% of their last 5 matches, so the signal balance is moderately in favor of both teams scoring; therefore I assign a 65% probability to "yes" and 35% to "no".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining xG values and defensive metrics, I expect Nanjing City to score about 1.38 goals (attack xG 1.00 vs opponent conceded xG 1.76), while Meizhou Hakka around 0.91 goals (attack xG 0.72 vs opponent conceded xG 1.10), yielding a total of approximately 2.29 goals. With this 2.29 total, calculations indicate roughly a 67% probability of Over 1.5 (at least 2 goals), about 40% for Over 2.5 (at least 3 goals) and around 20% for Over 3.5 (at least 4 goals). Additionally, Nanjing concedes on average 2.6 goals per match this season and registers 2.8 shots on target per game versus the visitors' 0.5; their higher share of shots on target (2.8 vs 0.5) and conversion rate 12% vs 10% increase the likelihood of scoring. Conversely, Meizhou averages only 0.5 goals per game and their away BTTS percentage is 0%, which weakens the very high-scoring scenario; the last 5 matches show a combined 3 goals for Nanjing and 4 for Meizhou, producing mixed signals. As a result, the strongest and most confident signal is Over 1.5 (I recommend Over 1.5) — the expected total of 2.29 and the home side's poor defense (2.6 conceded) favor the Over side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT scenario is 2/2 (the away team leads at the break and wins) — I assign it a 65% probability. Nanjing City concedes an average of 1.6 goals by half-time and leads at the break in 0% of matches, which strongly supports them losing the lead before the interval. Meizhou Hakka win 50% of matches and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games season-to-date, and they average 1.5 points after the break versus 0.8 for the hosts, so they possess a statistical advantage in the second half. Although the hosts’ xG is 1.0 compared to 0.72 for the visitors, Nanjing City concede on average 2.6 goals per game and score only 0.2 goals by half-time, which limits their chances of mounting a turnaround. Therefore alternatives such as 2/X (15%) or X/2 (8%) are possible but statistically less likely than 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nanjing City | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Meizhou Hakka is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Nanjing City · 1.2 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nanjing City is 129% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Nanjing City · 2.29 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka
Nanjing City scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
Meizhou Hakka scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Nanjing City keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nanjing City
Over / Under - Meizhou Hakka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nanjing City is 821% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Nanjing City · 0.14 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nanjing City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Meizhou Hakka - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nanjing City
Meizhou Hakka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Nanjing City | Liga | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.71 | 2.27 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 49% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 32% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka?
The China League One match finished Nanjing City 2:0 Meizhou Hakka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka?
Nanjing City score 0.71 goals per game on average and Meizhou Hakka 0.71. The China League One average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Nanjing City's matches and 43% of Meizhou Hakka's.
What form are Nanjing City and Meizhou Hakka in?
Over the last 5 games Nanjing City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Meizhou Hakka 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka?
The statistical background for Nanjing City vs Meizhou Hakka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


