Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics
Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nantong Zhiyun played Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Rugao Olympic Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Nantong Zhiyun: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nantong Zhiyun scores 1.35 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 2.10 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nantong Zhiyun 55%, Guangzhou E-Power 52%. Over 2.5: Nantong Zhiyun 35%, Guangzhou E-Power 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.42. Nantong Zhiyun: 12.2 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 16.1.
Match halves
Nantong Zhiyun: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.70. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.05.
Goals by minute
Nantong Zhiyun: 46-60 (6 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Guangzhou E-Power sit top of the table and remain unbeaten in their last five matches: they have won 4 and drawn 1, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 2. Nantong Zhiyun boast an excellent home record, with an 89% win rate, averaging 2 goals scored and only 0.67 goals conceded per match, making the hosts a major threat. However, the visitors have shown greater away efficiency: they average 2.2 goals, register 4.8 shots on target and convert 17% of their attempts, compared with Nantong’s 2 goals, 3.78 shots on target and 15% conversion rate. Guangzhou’s advantage in the quality of chances created is slight but also evident in xG, which stands at 1.57 away from home compared with the hosts’ 1.49 at home. A closely contested match with goals is expected, but the visitors’ current run and their very solid defensive record in recent weeks give them a marginal edge to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Nantong Zhiyun have scored an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Guangzhou E-Power have averaged 2.2, with very high xG figures of 2.00 and 1.57 respectively. The hosts have scored 12 goals and conceded 6 in their last five matches, meaning both teams scored in 80% of those games. Guangzhou are in excellent offensive form, with 14 goals in their last five appearances and an average of 2.8 goals, which should be enough even against well-organised hosts. The main argument against BTTS - Yes is Nantong’s defence: they have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their season matches and concede only 0.64 goals on average, while Guangzhou have conceded just 2 goals in their last five matches. Nevertheless, the combination of both teams’ current attacking form and Guangzhou’s 70% rate of matches featuring goals from both sides gives the BTTS - Yes scenario a slight but clear edge.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams regularly produce at least two goals: the 1.5-goal line was exceeded in 82% of Nantong Zhiyun’s matches and 80% of Guangzhou E-Power’s fixtures. The hosts create chances worth an average of 2.00 xG and attempt 18.91 shots per match, while the visitors score an average of 2.20 goals and convert their chances at a 17% rate. In their last five matches, Nantong scored 2.4 goals per game and Guangzhou as many as 2.8, with both teams recording Over 2.5 in 60% of those appearances. The hosts’ defense is solid, conceding just 0.64 goals on average, which is why the 2.75-goal projection does not provide an equally strong edge for Over 2.5. The safest pick remains Over 1.5, as the attacking profile of both teams clearly reduces the risk of a 0:0 or 1:0 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Guangzhou E-Power are in excellent form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Nantong Zhiyun have won only twice and drawn twice. The visitors led at the break in 4 of their last 5 games, scoring an average of 1.6 goals in the first half and conceding none. Over the same period, Nantong conceded an average of 0.8 goals before half-time and led at the break in only 40% of their matches. Across the season as a whole, the hosts do have a very solid defence, conceding an average of just 0.64 goals, but the visitors’ current attacking strength stands at 2.8 goals per match, while they concede only 0.4. Therefore, the HT/FT scenario of Guangzhou E-Power leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle has the strongest support from their current form and first-half data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nantong Zhiyun | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Guangzhou E-Power is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 2.6 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1.35 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 2.1 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Guangzhou E-Power is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.85 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 0.81 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Nantong Zhiyun scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Nantong Zhiyun keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nantong Zhiyun
Over / Under - Guangzhou E-Power
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 2 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nantong Zhiyun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nantong Zhiyun
Guangzhou E-Power
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Nantong Zhiyun | Liga | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.74 | ▲ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 56% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 26% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Nantong Zhiyun 0 - 0 - 3 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power?
The China League One match finished Nantong Zhiyun 1:1 Guangzhou E-Power. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nantong Zhiyun and Guangzhou E-Power?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nantong Zhiyun won 0, Guangzhou E-Power won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power?
Nantong Zhiyun score 1.35 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 2.10. The China League One average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Nantong Zhiyun's matches and 52% of Guangzhou E-Power's.
What form are Nantong Zhiyun and Guangzhou E-Power in?
Over the last 5 games Nantong Zhiyun have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power?
The statistical background for Nantong Zhiyun vs Guangzhou E-Power — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


