Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics
Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nantong Zhiyun played Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Rugao Olympic Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Nantong Zhiyun: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nantong Zhiyun scores 1.00 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.56 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nantong Zhiyun 47%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 81%. Over 2.5: Nantong Zhiyun 27%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.28. Nantong Zhiyun: 11.0 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.7.
Match halves
Nantong Zhiyun: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Nantong Zhiyun: 46-60 (4 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): Nantong Zhiyun sit 3rd and boast an 86% home win rate, averaging 1.29 goals scored and only 0.57 conceded per home match while keeping 71% clean sheets. Heilongjiang Lava Spring are 11th; despite 25 goals this season and 1.75 goals per away match, they concede 1.88 on the road and register only 13% clean sheets, exposing defensive frailty. In their last 5 matches Nantong scored 6 goals with a 2-2-1 record (1.6 points per game), whereas the visitors have 10 goals but no wins in five (0W-3D-2L) and conceded 14. Hosts control tempo at home (60% possession, 12.71 shots per game, 3 on target) and their home xG is 1.39 versus xG against 0.93; visitors average 4 shots on target away and a 19% conversion rate, but their xG against away is 1.64, indicating they create chances but are vulnerable to conceding. Although the visitors draw 63% of their away games, given Nantong’s 0% matches without scoring at home, 71% clean sheets and clearly superior defensive metrics, I assess the home side as more likely to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams strongly indicate BTTS: Nantong has a seasonal BTTS rate of 88%, Heilongjiang 75%, versus a league average of 53%, which provides a clear edge toward a both-teams-to-score scenario. Defensively both sides concede frequently — seasonal goals conceded are 1.75 (home) and 1.88 (away), and in the last 5 matches Heilongjiang conceded an average of 2.8 goals, increasing the likelihood of the home side scoring. Offensively Nantong has xG 1.52 and 5.0 shots on target with a conversion rate of 11%, Heilongjiang has xG 1.14 with 4.0 shots on target and a 19% conversion; despite a lower seasonal xG the away side have scored 25 goals versus Nantong’s 15, so both teams possess realistic scoring potential. Additionally the hosts have no clean sheets this season (0%), and both teams produced BTTS in 60% of their last 5 games, confirming the mutual-scoring trend. Based on these figures I assess BTTS probability at 78% versus 22% for No BTTS, therefore the best pick is 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals based on xG: home xG = (1.52 + 1.64)/2 = 1.58, away xG = (1.14 + 1.48)/2 = 1.31, giving a total of 2.89 expected goals. Seasonal stats confirm high scoring potential — Over 1.5 occurred in 88% of matches for both teams combined, with the home side having 88% of matches with both teams scoring, and the away side 75%. For the 2.5 line, seasonally the home team has Over2.5 in 50% of games, the away team 63%, and in the last 5 away matches Over2.5 was 80%, so I estimate approximately a 62% chance of Over2.5 given the combined xG of 2.89. Seasonal Over3.5 is only 38% for both sides, so Under3.5 is more likely (62%). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (88% seasonally and 2.89 expected goals), therefore I recommend an "over" on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict X/X (draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time). The home side have been level at the break in 50% of matches, and over full time draws occur for home and away teams in 50% and 63% of matches respectively, which provides a strong signal for an FT draw. On average the home team scores 0.63 goals by half-time and the away team 0.75, while the mean goals at the break are 1.63 for homes and 1.38 for aways, so I expect a balanced, low-scoring first 45 minutes. Homes generate more xG (1.52 vs 1.14) but convert at a lower rate (11% vs 19%), and both teams find the net in a large proportion of games (88% and 75%), which favors a 1-1 draw. Additionally, in the last five matches the home side have a 40% win rate while the away side have 0% wins, supporting that the most plausible scenario is maintaining the draw from Half-Time to Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nantong Zhiyun | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nantong Zhiyun is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 0.6 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 1.56 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Nantong Zhiyun is 148% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.73 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 1.81 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Nantong Zhiyun scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Nantong Zhiyun keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nantong Zhiyun
Over / Under - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nantong Zhiyun is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 1.13 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nantong Zhiyun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nantong Zhiyun
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Nantong Zhiyun | Liga | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.73 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 54% | ▲ 81% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 52% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 28% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 71% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Nantong Zhiyun 0 - 3 - 0 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
The China League One match finished Nantong Zhiyun 5:1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nantong Zhiyun and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nantong Zhiyun won 0, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Nantong Zhiyun score 1.00 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.56. The China League One average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Nantong Zhiyun's matches and 81% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.
What form are Nantong Zhiyun and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?
Over the last 5 games Nantong Zhiyun have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nantong Zhiyun vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


