China - China League OneRugao Olympic Sports Center StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka: match statistics

Nantong Zhiyun crest
Nantong Zhiyun
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Meizhou Hakka crest
Meizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nantong Zhiyun played Meizhou Hakka in China League One (China). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Rugao Olympic Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Nantong Zhiyun: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Meizhou Hakka: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nantong Zhiyun scores 1.00 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. Meizhou Hakka scores 0.82 and concedes 1.91. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nantong Zhiyun 36%, Meizhou Hakka 45%. Over 2.5: Nantong Zhiyun 18%, Meizhou Hakka 64%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Nantong Zhiyun has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.02. Nantong Zhiyun: 10.0 shots per match, Meizhou Hakka: 7.6.

Match halves

Nantong Zhiyun: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64. Meizhou Hakka: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Nantong Zhiyun: 46-60 (3 goals). Meizhou Hakka: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nantong Zhiyun has a clear home advantage: they have won all home matches (6 wins, 100% win rate), kept a clean sheet in 83% of home games and concede only 0.17 goals per home match on average. Offensively the hosts average 11.17 shots and 2.67 on target per home game, scoring 1.33 goals with an average xG of 1.21, whereas Meizhou Hakka away averages 6.8 shots, 2.2 on target and only 0.6 goals with xG 0.94. Defensively the visitors are weak — they concede 1.2 goals per away match on average, have an average xG against of 1.65 and failed to score in 40% of away games, while the hosts have no such home game (0%), which increases Nantong’s edge. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 and conceded 3 (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss; 1.6 points per game on average), while the visitors scored 5 and conceded 7 (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses; 1.0 point per game), confirming Nantong’s greater stability and efficiency. Considering 100% home wins, superiority in shots (11.17 vs 6.8), better home xG (1.21 vs 0.94) and the visitors’ weaker defense (1.2 goals conceded away and xG against 1.65), I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I favour the "both teams to score" scenario as more likely because Nantong has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and has recorded 0% clean sheets at home, indicating that roughly 2 out of 3 of their matches see goals from both sides. Nantong generates xG 1.09 per match, while Meizhou concedes xG 1.65 and have conceded 21 goals in the season overall, so the home side has the statistical potential to score. The away side has counterarguments: Meizhou average only 0.6 goals per match this season and have a seasonal BTTS of just 20%, and they have kept a clean sheet in 40% of games, which reduces confidence that they will score. Supporting BTTS is recent form over the last 5 rounds — Meizhou score 1.0 goal on average and have BTTS in 60% of those 5 matches, while Nantong have conceded 0.6 goals on average in their last 5, which together increases the chance of both teams scoring. Considering the hosts' 67% BTTS, 0% clean sheets, Nantong xG 1.09 versus opponents’ 1.65 xG against Meizhou, and Meizhou’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, I estimate BTTS at 62% vs 38% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based calculations yield approximately 1.37 expected goals for Nantong (attacking xG 1.09 vs opponent defensive xG 1.65 -> average ~1.37) and 1.08 for Meizhou (attacking xG 0.94 vs opponent defensive xG 1.21 -> ~1.08), totaling 2.45 expected goals. That total of 2.45 is clearly above the 1.5 threshold, and seasonal percentages confirm this tendency: home side seasonOver15 100%, away side 60%, which strengthens the signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line signals are mixed: seasonally the home team has seasonOver25 100% but in the last 5 matches their Over 2.5 dropped to 20%, while the visitors seasonally have only 20%, so the 2.5 forecast is essentially balanced (my model: 46% Over vs 54% Under). The 3.5 threshold looks unlikely (expected 2.45 vs seasonal over3.5: home 33%, away 0%), therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest and best-justified option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Nantong Zhiyun frequently trails at the break — in 6 of the analyzed matches they were behind at half-time, i.e. 100% (trailingAtHT_home = 6, trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 100%), and they concede on average 1.67 goals before the break (concededAVGHT_home = 1.67). Meizhou Hakka shows stronger season form: 1.4 points per game versus the home side’s 0.67 (seasonPPG_away = 1.4 vs seasonPPG_home = 0.67) and a 40% win rate this season compared to Nantong’s 17% (winPercentage_away = 40% vs winPercentage_home = 17%). The hosts do produce slightly higher xG (1.09 vs 0.94) and more shots per game (8.33 vs 6.8), but they concede many goals overall (seasonConcededAVG_home = 2.5) and have no clean sheets this season (seasonCSPercentage_home = 0%). Given these specific figures, the strongest signal is an away lead at the break and maintaining that advantage to full-time, so I prefer the 2/2 scenario and assign it the highest probability (55%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

76Possession (%)24
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
22Shots11
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
5Shots on target6
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
2.45xG1.38
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
11Corners2
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
99Dangerous attacks36
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
10Fouls19
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0Cards4
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
1Goals scored / match0.82
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.55Goals conceded / match1.91
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
51%Average possession47%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
2.64Shots on target / match2.55
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match7.64
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
2.64Shots on target2.55
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
10%Shot conversion10.7%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
51%Possession47%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
1.17xG for1.02
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
1.05xG against1.41
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Shooting quality

Nantong Zhiyun: BalancedMeizhou Hakka: Balanced
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
Accuracy (shots on target)26%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nantong Zhiyun is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 1 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun
LWDDW
Season result split
55% W36% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Meizhou Hakka
LLWDD
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nantong Zhiyun is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 0.82 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun is 247% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.55 goals / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 1.91 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun scoring profile: very strong

Nantong Zhiyun scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

Meizhou Hakka scoring profile: mixed

Meizhou Hakka scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Nantong Zhiyun keeps a clean sheet in 64% (7 of 11 matches).

11Goals scored (season)9
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
6Goals conceded (season)21
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
1.55Average goals in match2.73
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal64%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
18%2 goals18%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%3 goals0%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%4 goals0%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

How often they concede at least...

36%1 goal82%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
9%2 goals64%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
9%3 goals36%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%4 goals9%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time27%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
9%Scored in both halves9%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
40%BTTS - last 560%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nantong Zhiyun is 264% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Nantong Zhiyun · 0.45 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing
Meizhou Hakka - half-time state
9% leading18% draw73% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)0.45
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.36
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)1.18
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.55Average goals (1st half)1.55
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
91%Clean sheet before half-time18%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
64%No goal before half-time64%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.09
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
1Average goals (2nd half)1.18
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
64%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka
45%No goal after half-time64%
Nantong ZhiyunMeizhou Hakka

Nantong Zhiyun - second-half results

45% W36% R18% P
18
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Meizhou Hakka - second-half results

27% W27% R45% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nantong Zhiyun - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Meizhou Hakka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nantong Zhiyun
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Meizhou Hakka
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
2
5
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nantong Zhiyun

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Meizhou Hakka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Nantong ZhiyunLigaMeizhou Hakka
Average goals in match 1.552.46 2.73
Both teams scored 36%52% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%46% 64%
Clean sheets 64%29% 18%
Goal before half-time 45%72% 91%
Goal after half-time 73%71% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Meizhou HakkaGoalVinni Dugary TribouletAssist: Haoran Wang
  2. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardJiajun Liao
  3. Meizhou HakkaGoalVinni Dugary TribouletAssist: Hamza Sakhi
  4. Nantong ZhiyunGoalDaochi YeAssist: Xingyu Wu
  5. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardXiaobin Sun
  6. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardYihu Yang
  7. Meizhou HakkaGoalVinni Dugary TribouletAssist: Jiarun Li
  8. Meizhou HakkaSubstitutionOn: Baojie ZhuOff: Vinni Dugary Triboulet
  9. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardZhanlin Wen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka?

The China League One match finished Nantong Zhiyun 1:3 Meizhou Hakka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka?

Nantong Zhiyun score 1.00 goals per game on average and Meizhou Hakka 0.82. The China League One average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Nantong Zhiyun's matches and 45% of Meizhou Hakka's.

What form are Nantong Zhiyun and Meizhou Hakka in?

Over the last 5 games Nantong Zhiyun have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Meizhou Hakka 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka?

The statistical background for Nantong Zhiyun vs Meizhou Hakka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.