Nasaf vs Navbahor: match statistics
Nasaf vs Navbahor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nasaf played Navbahor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Nasaf: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Navbahor: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nasaf scores 1.20 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Navbahor scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nasaf 60%, Navbahor 50%. Over 2.5: Nasaf 30%, Navbahor 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Navbahor has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.38. Nasaf: 12.0 shots per match, Navbahor: 13.5.
Match halves
Nasaf: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.80. Navbahor: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). Navbahor: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Navbahor to win ('2') because the visitors have a clear advantage in form and efficiency. Navbahor have won 3 of their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.0 points per match over that period, while Nasaf have not recorded a win in their last 5 and average only 0.6 pts per match. Away, Navbahor score an average of 1.5 goals with 4.5 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, whereas Nasaf at home score 1.0 goal with 4.6 shots on target and a 7% conversion, which indicates the visitors’ superiority in chance conversion. Defensively Navbahor concede 0.83 goals per away match versus Nasaf’s 1.0 conceded at home, and the visitors’ away goal difference is +4 compared to 0 for the hosts, so despite Nasaf’s higher possession (59% vs 50%) and similar xG (1.61 vs 1.55), Navbahor present better metrics that translate into results.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams generate identical offensive xG (1.55 vs 1.55), and season goals averages are 1.25 for Nasaf and 1.50 for Navbahor, indicating both can create scoring chances. In the last 5 matches the home side has recorded BTTS in 100% of games, while the visitors only 40%; additionally Nasaf concedes on average 1.8 goals in those 5 games, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. A counter signal comes from Navbahor’s defense — the visitors concede just 0.6 goals on average in their last 5 matches and have clean sheet expected in 50% of season games, which reduces BTTS frequency when they are involved. Offensive stats also support goals: shots on target 4.25 vs 4.50 and conversion 9% vs 11%, and season goal tallies are 12-11 for Nasaf and 14-8 for Navbahor, so both sides have genuine scoring ability. Considering the strong xG 1.55/1.55, the home side’s 100% BTTS in the last 5, the league BTTS average of 55%, but also Navbahor’s half of matches without conceding, I assess BTTS at 65% vs 35% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG, Nasaf has xG_for 1.55 versus the opponent’s xG_against 1.26, yielding about 1.41 expected goals for the home side; Navbahor has xG_for 1.55 versus the home side’s xG_against 0.72, yielding about 1.13 for the visitors — a combined 2.54 expected goals. Seasonally Nasaf finishes matches with over 1.5 goals in 75% of cases, Navbahor in 83%, and the league averages 2.63 goals per match, which strongly supports Over 1.5. However, signals for the 2.5 line are mixed: seasonally Nasaf has only 25% of matches >2.5, Navbahor 50%, and in the last 5 fixtures Nasaf had 60% Over 2.5 versus 20% for Navbahor, so I rate the chance of Over 2.5 as marginally below 50%. Both teams average 14 and 13.17 shots with 4.25 and 4.5 on target and conversion rates of 9% and 11%, which together with zero matches above 3.5 goals this season (0% for both) significantly reduces the probability of Over 3.5. Therefore the best and strongest recommendation is an Over 1.5 bet (I assess approx. 82% probability), while Over 2.5 is marginal (~48%) and Over 3.5 is practically unprofitable (~5%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Navbahor win at Full-Time (X/2). The data indicate an even first half: both teams have identical xG of 1.55, Nasaf averages 0.75 goals to the break at home while Navbahor averages 1.00, and the hosts have 100% clean sheets to half-time at home (0.0 goals conceded). Navbahor looks stronger after the break — in the last 5 matches the visitors have won 3 of 5 (60%), have a positive second-half goal difference of +1.0 and averaged 1.6 points per match in those second halves, suggesting an ability to decide games after the interval. Additionally, the visitors have higher shot conversion (11% versus the hosts’ 9%), so with equal xG superior finishing increases their chances of scoring the decisive goals in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nasaf | Navbahor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Navbahor is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Nasaf · 2 pts / match - Navbahor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navbahor is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Nasaf · 1.4 goals / match - Navbahor
Navbahor is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Nasaf · 0.8 goals / match - Navbahor
Nasaf scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
Navbahor scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasaf
Over / Under - Navbahor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navbahor is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Nasaf · 1.8 pts / match - Navbahor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Navbahor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nasaf
Navbahor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Nasaf | Liga | Navbahor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 52% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Nasaf 1 - 1 - 0 Navbahor. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nasaf vs Navbahor?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 0:0 Navbahor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Navbahor?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 1, Navbahor won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Navbahor?
Nasaf score 1.20 goals per game on average and Navbahor 1.40. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nasaf's matches and 50% of Navbahor's.
What form are Nasaf and Navbahor in?
Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Navbahor 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Navbahor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasaf vs Navbahor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


