Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Nasaf vs Xorazm: match statistics

Nasaf crest
Nasaf
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Xorazm crest
Xorazm
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Nasaf are displaying significantly better form than Xorazm, which is a key factor in this prediction. The hosts have earned 5 points in their last five matches (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses) with a goal difference of 3:4, while the visitors have recorded only 1 point (1 draw, 4 losses) and a very poor goal difference of 3:9. Xorazm's form is alarming - a series of four consecutive defeats before the last draw indicates serious offensive and defensive issues. Nasaf, playing at home, should capitalize on the home advantage and their significantly better form to secure all three points. The difference in points per match (1.0 for Nasaf vs 0.2 for Xorazm) further confirms the hosts' clear advantage.

Nasaf vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nasaf play Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 1 March 2026 at 15:15. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Nasaf: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Xorazm: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nasaf scores 1.23 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Xorazm scores 0.77 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nasaf 62%, Xorazm 46%. Over 2.5: Nasaf 31%, Xorazm 38%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Nasaf has higher xG: 1.45 vs 0.98. Nasaf: 13.2 shots per match, Xorazm: 7.4.

Match halves

Nasaf: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.77. Xorazm: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). Xorazm: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Nasaf are displaying significantly better form than Xorazm, which is a key factor in this prediction. The hosts have earned 5 points in their last five matches (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses) with a goal difference of 3:4, while the visitors have recorded only 1 point (1 draw, 4 losses) and a very poor goal difference of 3:9. Xorazm's form is alarming - a series of four consecutive defeats before the last draw indicates serious offensive and defensive issues. Nasaf, playing at home, should capitalize on the home advantage and their significantly better form to secure all three points. The difference in points per match (1.0 for Nasaf vs 0.2 for Xorazm) further confirms the hosts' clear advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
NasafXorazm
16Shots5
NasafXorazm
5Shots on target2
NasafXorazm
1.69xG0.66
NasafXorazm
6Corners0
NasafXorazm
46Dangerous attacks27
NasafXorazm
15Fouls10
NasafXorazm
1Cards1
NasafXorazm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match0.77
NasafXorazm
1Goals conceded / match1.31
NasafXorazm
52%Average possession49%
NasafXorazm
3.92Shots on target / match2.23
NasafXorazm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match7.38
NasafXorazm
3.92Shots on target2.23
NasafXorazm
9.4%Shot conversion10.4%
NasafXorazm
52%Possession49%
NasafXorazm
1.45xG for0.98
NasafXorazm
1.39xG against1.44
NasafXorazm

Shooting quality

Nasaf: BalancedXorazm: Balanced
NasafXorazm
Accuracy (shots on target)30%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nasaf is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Nasaf · 0.2 pts / match - Xorazm

Nasaf
LDDWD
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-3
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Xorazm
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W31% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Nasaf · 0.77 goals / match - Xorazm

Nasaf is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Nasaf · 1.31 goals / match - Xorazm

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Xorazm scoring profile: strong

Xorazm scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

16Goals scored (season)10
NasafXorazm
13Goals conceded (season)17
NasafXorazm
2.23Average goals in match2.08
NasafXorazm
8Goals scored (last 5)1
NasafXorazm
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
NasafXorazm

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal62%
NasafXorazm
31%2 goals15%
NasafXorazm
8%3 goals0%
NasafXorazm
0%4 goals0%
NasafXorazm

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal77%
NasafXorazm
23%2 goals46%
NasafXorazm
8%3 goals8%
NasafXorazm
0%4 goals0%
NasafXorazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time15%
NasafXorazm
8%BTTS in both halves8%
NasafXorazm
15%Scored in both halves15%
NasafXorazm

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
NasafXorazm
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
NasafXorazm
80%BTTS - last 520%
NasafXorazm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
NasafXorazm
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
NasafXorazm
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NasafXorazm

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
NasafXorazm
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
NasafXorazm
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NasafXorazm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasaf is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Nasaf · 0.77 pts / match - Xorazm

Nasaf - half-time state
8% leading77% draw15% trailing
Xorazm - half-time state
8% leading54% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.77
NasafXorazm
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.23
NasafXorazm
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
NasafXorazm
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.92
NasafXorazm
54%Clean sheet before half-time46%
NasafXorazm
62%No goal before half-time77%
NasafXorazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per match (2nd half)1.23
NasafXorazm
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
NasafXorazm
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
NasafXorazm
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.15
NasafXorazm
54%Clean sheet after half-time38%
NasafXorazm
38%No goal after half-time46%
NasafXorazm

Nasaf - second-half results

38% W38% R23% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Xorazm - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nasaf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Xorazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Xorazm
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
5
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Xorazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

NasafLigaXorazm
Average goals in match 2.232.63 2.08
Both teams scored 62%57% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%53% 38%
Clean sheets 31%25% 23%
Goal before half-time 54%69% 62%
Goal after half-time 77%78% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nasaf 1 - 1 - 0 Xorazm. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Nasaf Qarshi
2 : 1
Xorazm FK Urganch
Xorazm FK Urganch
1 : 1
FC Nasaf Qarshi

FAQ

What was the result of Nasaf vs Xorazm?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Nasaf 1:0 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nasaf and Xorazm?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nasaf won 1, Xorazm won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nasaf vs Xorazm?

Nasaf score 1.23 goals per game on average and Xorazm 0.77. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Nasaf's matches and 46% of Xorazm's.

What form are Nasaf and Xorazm in?

Over the last 5 games Nasaf have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Xorazm 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasaf vs Xorazm?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasaf vs Xorazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.