Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 13 September 2026

Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance: match statistics

155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Nasarawa United displays impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a positive goal difference of +10 in home matches. The hosts score effectively at their own stadium (averaging 1.31 goals per game) with high possession (57%) and only 15% of matches without a goal. Bendel Insurance has poor away effectiveness with only a 23% win rate and a negative goal difference of -3, as well as a very high rate of matches without scoring (46%). xG statistics also favor the hosts (2.14 vs 1.36), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. The recent form of both teams is similar (1.2 points per game each), however, Nasarawa United's home advantage should tip the scales in their favor, although the guests' solid defense (31% clean sheets) could make it a closely contested match.

Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nasarawa United played Bendel Insurance in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 22 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Nasarawa United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Bendel Insurance: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nasarawa United scores 0.92 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Bendel Insurance scores 1.12 and concedes 0.88. League average: 1.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nasarawa United 38%, Bendel Insurance 42%. Over 2.5: Nasarawa United 27%, Bendel Insurance 23%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 26%.

xG, shots and style

Nasarawa United has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.59. Nasarawa United: 8.7 shots per match, Bendel Insurance: 9.2.

Match halves

Nasarawa United: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.42. Bendel Insurance: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Nasarawa United: 31-45+ (7 goals). Bendel Insurance: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 1.82 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 26%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nasarawa United displays impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a positive goal difference of +10 in home matches. The hosts score effectively at their own stadium (averaging 1.31 goals per game) with high possession (57%) and only 15% of matches without a goal. Bendel Insurance has poor away effectiveness with only a 23% win rate and a negative goal difference of -3, as well as a very high rate of matches without scoring (46%). xG statistics also favor the hosts (2.14 vs 1.36), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. The recent form of both teams is similar (1.2 points per game each), however, Nasarawa United's home advantage should tip the scales in their favor, although the guests' solid defense (31% clean sheets) could make it a closely contested match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
12Shots6
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
5Shots on target1
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
1.44xG0.65
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
10Corners0
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
45Dangerous attacks26
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
-1Fouls-1
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
-1Cards-1
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.92Goals scored / match1.12
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.77Goals conceded / match0.88
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
39%Average possession41%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
3.19Shots on target / match3.42
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.69Shots per match9.15
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
3.19Shots on target3.42
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
10.6%Shot conversion12.2%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
39%Possession41%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
1.73xG for1.59
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
1.43xG against1.29
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Shooting quality

Nasarawa United: BalancedBendel Insurance: Counter-attacking
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nasarawa United
WDDDL
Season result split
42% W31% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-7
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.12Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Bendel Insurance
LDDWD
Season result split
35% W42% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bendel Insurance is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Nasarawa United · 1.12 goals / match - Bendel Insurance

Nasarawa United is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.77 goals / match - Nasarawa United · 0.88 goals / match - Bendel Insurance

Nasarawa United scoring profile: mixed

Nasarawa United scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Bendel Insurance keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Bendel Insurance scoring profile: strong

Bendel Insurance scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).

24Goals scored (season)29
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
20Goals conceded (season)23
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
1.69Average goals in match2
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal65%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
27%2 goals31%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
4%3 goals15%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0%4 goals0%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal62%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
8%2 goals23%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
4%3 goals4%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0%4 goals0%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Bendel Insurance - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
36%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time27%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
19%Scored in both halves19%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
80%BTTS - last 520%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
15%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bendel Insurance is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Nasarawa United · 1.46 pts / match - Bendel Insurance

Nasarawa United - half-time state
23% leading54% draw23% trailing
Bendel Insurance - half-time state
27% leading65% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.46
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.96Average goals (1st half)1
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
54%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
54%No goal before half-time50%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
0.73Average goals (2nd half)1
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
73%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance
65%No goal after half-time65%
Nasarawa UnitedBendel Insurance

Nasarawa United - second-half results

31% W46% D23% L
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bendel Insurance - second-half results

23% W46% D31% L
38
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nasarawa United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Bendel Insurance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nasarawa United
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
7
6
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Bendel Insurance
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nasarawa United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Bendel Insurance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Nasarawa UnitedLigaBendel Insurance
Average goals in match 1.691.82 2.00
Both teams scored 38%36% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%26% 23%
Clean sheets 35%39% 38%
Goal before half-time 69%59% 54%
Goal after half-time 58%59% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.82
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.56
Away goals / match
+125%
Home attack advantage
+56%
Home defence advantage
+45%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nasarawa UnitedGoalJoshua John

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nasarawa United 1 - 0 - 0 Bendel Insurance. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Bendel Insurance
0 : 1
Nasarawa United

FAQ

What was the result of Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance?

The NPFL match finished Nasarawa United 1:0 Bendel Insurance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance?

Nasarawa United score 0.92 goals per game on average and Bendel Insurance 1.12. The NPFL average is 1.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Nasarawa United's matches and 42% of Bendel Insurance's.

What form are Nasarawa United and Bendel Insurance in?

Over the last 5 games Nasarawa United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Bendel Insurance 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance?

The statistical background for Nasarawa United vs Bendel Insurance — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.