United States - MLSGEODIS ParkData current as of 30 August 2026

Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics

Nashville SC crest
Nashville SC
4 : 0half-time 0:0
FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati

Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nashville SC played FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: GEODIS Park. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Nashville SC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nashville SC scores 2.05 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. FC Cincinnati scores 2.33 and concedes 2.24. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nashville SC 48%, FC Cincinnati 81%. Over 2.5: Nashville SC 57%, FC Cincinnati 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.36. Nashville SC: 11.5 shots per match, FC Cincinnati: 13.9.

Match halves

Nashville SC: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14. FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.24.

Goals by minute

Nashville SC: 16-30 (9 goals). FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nashville SC are exceptionally strong at home: they have won 91% of their matches, remain unbeaten there, and average 2.91 goals per game. FC Cincinnati win just 10% of their away matches, draw as many as 50%, and concede an average of 2.60 goals, without a single clean sheet. The hosts also create slightly higher-quality chances, posting an average xG of 1.56 compared with Cincinnati’s 1.43, while registering more shots on target: 5.91 to 5.20. Nashville have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 13 goals during that run, while the visitors have managed just 7. Nashville’s superior finishing efficiency, 22% compared with 15%, combined with Cincinnati’s significantly weaker away form, strongly supports a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is very strong, as 73% of Nashville’s matches this season featured goals from both teams, while the figure for Cincinnati was as high as 90%, well above the league average of 63%. Cincinnati have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.60 goals per match, while Nashville score 2.82 goals at home. The hosts are not particularly solid defensively either, averaging 1.91 goals conceded with an xG against of 1.65, while Cincinnati create an average of 1.43 xG. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS at 80%; Nashville scored an average of 2.6 goals, while Cincinnati, despite their lower average of 1.4, still regularly created chances worth 1.65 xG. A scenario in which one of the teams fails to score is less likely, as Nashville have been held scoreless in only 9% of their matches, compared with 10% for Cincinnati.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Nashville’s matches average 2.82 goals, while Cincinnati’s games produce an average of 1.80 goals, with both teams exceeding the 1.5-goal line in 91% and 90% of matches, respectively. The hosts create an average of 1.73 xG, while Cincinnati allows opponents 1.93 xG, clearly supporting their scoring potential. The visitors also have offensive arguments: their average xG stands at 1.43, while Nashville’s defense allows opponents 1.65 xG. In Nashville’s last five matches, there have been 3.8 total goals per game, and both teams scored in 80% of those fixtures. The strongest signal is therefore Over 1.5 goals, as the consistency of exceeding this line is very high, while the projected 3.20 goals provide a substantial safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point, as Nashville were level at the break in 45% of their matches, compared with 50% for Cincinnati. However, the home side have a clear advantage over the full match: they won 64% of their games and average 2.82 goals, while Cincinnati have won just 10% of their away matches and concede an average of 2.60 goals. After the break, Nashville score an average of 1.64 goals and earn 1.82 points per game during this period, whereas the visitors score only 0.80 goals and concede 1.50. Moreover, Nashville have won 80% of their last five matches and averaged 1.4 goals after half-time, further strengthening the scenario of a draw at the break followed by a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
-1Shots-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
-1Shots on target-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0xG0
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
-1Corners-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0Dangerous attacks0
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
-1Fouls-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
-1Cards-1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
2.05Goals scored / match2.33
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0.81Goals conceded / match2.24
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
54%Average possession50%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
4.76Shots on target / match5.95
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.52Shots per match13.86
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
4.76Shots on target5.95
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
17.8%Shot conversion16.8%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
54%Possession50%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
1.36xG for1.59
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
1.22xG against1.78
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Shooting quality

Nashville SC: Efficient finishingFC Cincinnati: Efficient finishing
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
Accuracy (shots on target)41%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nashville SC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Nashville SC · 1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Nashville SC
LDWWW
Season result split
71% W19% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-4-2
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-1-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FC Cincinnati
LWDWD
Season result split
38% W33% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - Nashville SC · 2.33 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Nashville SC is 177% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Nashville SC · 2.24 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Nashville SC scoring profile: very strong

Nashville SC scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

43Goals scored (season)49
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
17Goals conceded (season)47
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
2.86Average goals in match4.57
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal90%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
62%2 goals67%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
38%3 goals43%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
19%4 goals24%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal90%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
24%2 goals62%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0%3 goals38%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0%4 goals19%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time62%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
10%BTTS in both halves43%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
48%Scored in both halves52%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time71%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time43%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.76 pts / match - Nashville SC · 1.33 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Nashville SC - half-time state
43% leading48% draw10% trailing
FC Cincinnati - half-time state
29% leading48% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.76Points per match (1st half)1.33
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0.9Goals scored (1st half)1.1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
1.29Average goals (1st half)2.1
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
67%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
48%No goal before half-time19%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

After half-time (2nd half)

2.05Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)1.24
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)1.24
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
1.57Average goals (2nd half)2.48
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
67%Clean sheet after half-time24%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati
24%No goal after half-time38%
Nashville SCFC Cincinnati

Nashville SC - second-half results

57% W33% R10% P
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

38% W24% R38% P
28
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nashville SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
9
4
16-30
6
3
31-45
8
3
46-60
7
4
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
10
16-30
13
8
31-45
6
11
46-60
3
4
61-75
17
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
171%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Nashville SCLigaFC Cincinnati
Average goals in match 2.863.19 4.57
Both teams scored 48%63% 81%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%61% 67%
Clean sheets 43%20% 10%
Goal before half-time 62%77% 81%
Goal after half-time 86%81% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati?

The MLS match finished Nashville SC 4:0 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati?

Nashville SC score 2.05 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.33. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Nashville SC's matches and 81% of FC Cincinnati's.

What form are Nashville SC and FC Cincinnati in?

Over the last 5 games Nashville SC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nashville SC vs FC Cincinnati: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.