Nasr vs Proxy: match statistics
Nasr vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nasr played Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Nasr: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Proxy: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nasr scores 1.43 and concedes 0.71 goals per match. Proxy scores 0.29 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nasr 57%, Proxy 0%. Over 2.5: Nasr 29%, Proxy 29%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.14. Nasr: 7.4 shots per match, Proxy: 9.7.
Match halves
Nasr: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14. Proxy: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14.
Goals by minute
Nasr: 76-90+ (4 goals). Proxy: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nasr have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals in the process, while Proxy have failed to win any of their five games and have scored just 1 goal. The hosts win 67% of their home matches, while the visitors have lost all of their away games so far without scoring. Nasr also have the defensive edge: at home, they concede an average of 0.33 goals and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, whereas Proxy concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home. The visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.24 xG, giving the hosts an opportunity to maintain their scoring form despite a modest home xG of 0.79. Proxy’s away xG of 1.00 is a reminder that a draw cannot be ruled out, although their average of just 1.33 shots on target per match limits their chances of turning things around.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No is Proxy’s away record: they average 0 goals and have failed to score in 100% of those matches. In their last 5 games, the visitors have scored just 1 goal in total, while Nasr have conceded an average of 0.8 goals per game over that period. The hosts have greater attacking potential — they scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches, while Proxy conceded 7 — which points more towards one team scoring than both. Although Nasr recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, compared with 20% for Proxy, the visitors’ very poor scoring record makes it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in any of Nasr’s home matches or Proxy’s away matches so far. Proxy have yet to score away from home and average just 1.33 shots on target, limiting the chances of a high-scoring game from both sides. However, Nasr could exploit the visitors’ defensive weakness: they concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home and allow opponents chances worth 2.24 xG. Nasr’s form calls for caution with the lower line: the team have averaged 2.8 goals in their last five matches, with at least three goals scored in 60% of those games. Therefore, with a forecast of 2.10 total goals, Under 3.5 goals has a clearer edge than Under 2.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: in recent matches, both teams were level at the break in 50% of cases, and Proxy did not score a single goal in the first half. Nasr also rarely scores before half-time, averaging 0.25 first-half goals this season. After the break, the hosts should have a clearer advantage: in recent matches, they averaged 1.5 goals in the second half, while Proxy conceded an average of 1.0 and scored none. Nasr’s recent form also supports a win: they have won four of their last five matches and averaged 2.8 goals scored, compared with no wins and 0.2 goals for Proxy. Therefore, a half-time draw followed by a Nasr win is slightly more likely than the hosts taking the lead at the break and going on to win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nasr | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 58% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.14 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nasr is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Nasr · 0.6 pts / match - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nasr is 393% better for: goals scored per match.
1.43 goals / match - Nasr · 0.29 goals / match - Proxy
Nasr is 101% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.71 goals / match - Nasr · 1.43 goals / match - Proxy
Nasr scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
Proxy scores in 14% of matches (1 of 7 matches), while Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nasr
Over / Under - Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nasr is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Nasr · 0.71 pts / match - Proxy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nasr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nasr
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nasr | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.14 | 2.21 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 39% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Nasr vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished Nasr 1:1 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nasr vs Proxy?
Nasr score 1.43 goals per game on average and Proxy 0.29. The Second Division average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Nasr's matches and 0% of Proxy's.
What form are Nasr and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Nasr have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Proxy 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nasr vs Proxy?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nasr vs Proxy: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.