Iran - Azadegan LeagueVatani StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nassaji Mazandaran play Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 21 May 2026 at 15:15. Venue: Vatani Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Nassaji Mazandaran: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nassaji Mazandaran scores 1.41 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nassaji Mazandaran 32%, Navad Urmia 30%. Over 2.5: Nassaji Mazandaran 35%, Navad Urmia 21%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Nassaji Mazandaran has higher xG: 1.83 vs 0.79. Nassaji Mazandaran: 5.2 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 0.9.

Match halves

Nassaji Mazandaran: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.82. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Nassaji Mazandaran: 61-75 (11 goals). Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Nassaji Mazandaran is the clear favorite to win: at home they average 2.17 xG and score 1.36 goals per match, while conceding just 0.27 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 82% of games. In comparison, Navad Urmia average 1.05 xG on the road, score 0.42 goals per away match and fail to score in 58% of fixtures, indicating significant problems in chance creation and finishing. The difference in quality of chances is also visible in shots: the hosts average 8.43 shots on target at home versus 3.0 on-target attempts for the visitors away, and a conversion rate of 11% versus 4% further amplifies Nassaji’s advantage. Additionally, the hosts sit 2nd with a home record of +12, while the visitors are 16th with an away record of -9 and a 67% away loss rate. Considering also the recent form—hosts averaging 1.6 points over the last 5 matches versus 0.8 points for the visitors—I back a Nassaji victory.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
16Shots1
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
3Shots on target0
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
2.02xG0.34
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
8Corners0
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
113Dangerous attacks37
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
12Fouls7
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0Cards0
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
1.41Goals scored / match0.48
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.5Goals conceded / match1.3
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
24%Average possession12%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
2.32Shots on target / match-0.15
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.15Shots per match0.94
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
2.32Shots on target-0.15
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
27.4%Shot conversion51.6%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
24%Possession12%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
1.83xG for0.79
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.73xG against1.3
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Nassaji Mazandaran: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)45%-16%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.360.84
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.610.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nassaji Mazandaran
WWLWL
Season result split
59% W26% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-5
2.03 pts / match · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Navad Urmia
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W36% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-17
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-12
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 194% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Nassaji Mazandaran is 160% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Nassaji Mazandaran scoring profile: very strong

Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 65% (22 of 34 matches).

48Goals scored (season)16
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
17Goals conceded (season)43
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
1.91Average goals in match1.79
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
6Goals scored (last 5)1
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal42%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
38%2 goals3%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
18%3 goals3%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
3%4 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

35%1 goal73%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
15%2 goals33%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0%3 goals12%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0%4 goals6%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

32%
Nassaji Mazandaran - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
15%Scored in both halves3%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
20%BTTS - last 520%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Nassaji Mazandaran - half-time state
26% leading59% draw15% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
12% leading55% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)0.91
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.71Average goals (1st half)0.82
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
76%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
68%No goal before half-time79%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.79
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
82%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia
44%No goal after half-time76%
Nassaji MazandaranNavad Urmia

Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
47
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
62
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding227%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

12% W58% R30% P
30
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nassaji Mazandaran - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nassaji Mazandaran
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
4
1
16-30
8
4
31-45
6
5
46-60
11
0
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nassaji Mazandaran

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Nassaji MazandaranLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals in match 1.911.59 1.79
Both teams scored 32%30% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%22% 21%
Clean sheets 65%46% 27%
Goal before half-time 47%46% 52%
Goal after half-time 65%57% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Nassaji Mazandaran 0 - 1 - 0 Navad Urmia. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Navad Urmia
0 : 0
Nassaji Mazandaran

FAQ

What was the result of Nassaji Mazandaran vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Nassaji Mazandaran 2:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nassaji Mazandaran vs Navad Urmia?

Nassaji Mazandaran score 1.41 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.48. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Nassaji Mazandaran's matches and 30% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Nassaji Mazandaran and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Nassaji Mazandaran have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nassaji Mazandaran vs Navad Urmia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.