Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueVatani StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics

Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nassaji Mazandaran played Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Vatani Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Nassaji Mazandaran: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Shams Azar Qazvin: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nassaji Mazandaran scores 0.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.67 and concedes 1.67. League average: 1.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nassaji Mazandaran 33%, Shams Azar Qazvin 67%. Over 2.5: Nassaji Mazandaran 0%, Shams Azar Qazvin 33%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 24%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Nassaji Mazandaran: -1.0 shots per match, Shams Azar Qazvin: -1.0.

Match halves

Nassaji Mazandaran: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00. Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Nassaji Mazandaran: 16-30 (1 goals). Shams Azar Qazvin: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 24%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams remain without a league win after three rounds, but Nassaji have collected 1 point with a 1:3 goal difference, while Shams Azar have 1 point and a 2:5 record. The hosts have looked slightly more stable over their last five matches, conceding 5 goals compared with 8 for the visitors, while also averaging 0.8 points per game versus 0.4. Nassaji’s main issue, however, is their attacking efficiency at home: they failed to score in their only home match and lost 0:1. Shams Azar drew in their away fixture, averaging 1 goal per game on the road, although their defence also concedes an average of 1 goal away from home. The poor quality of the results so far and the cautious profile of both teams point to a closely contested match, with a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is not stronger, as both teams scored in only 40% of their last five matches. Nassaji averaged 0.6 goals per game during this period, exactly the same as Shams Azar, indicating limited attacking potential on both sides. The hosts failed to score in 50% of their league matches, while the league average is just 1.86 goals per game, with BTTS at 38%. Although Shams Azar have conceded 1.6 goals per game recently, Nassaji have scored only 3 goals in their last five appearances, so they are not reliable candidates to exploit this weakness. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Iranian league has a very low average of 1.86 goals per match, with only 19% of games going over 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Nassaji scored just 3 goals, averaging 0.6 per game, while Shams Azar also averaged only 0.6 goals. Both teams recorded just 20% of matches with at least three goals during this run, while the combined average of goals conceded was 1.0 for the home side and 1.6 for the visitors. In the available season data, neither team recorded a match with more than 3.5 goals, further reducing the risk of an open, high-scoring scenario. Therefore, the strongest selection is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of around 2.00 goals provides a clear safety margin against this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches. During this period, Nassaji did not concede a single goal before half-time, while Shams Azar averaged just 0.2 goals in the first halves, clearly supporting a cautious start. The hosts have recently scored only 0.6 goals per match on average, exactly the same as the visitors, so neither side has the clear attacking advantage needed to secure a decisive result. Shams Azar have won none of their last five matches, with 40% ending in draws, while Nassaji have a win rate of just 20% and have lost as many as 60% of those games, which reduces the reliability of a home-win scenario. The league-wide average is 1.86 goals per match, and 81% of games end with at least one team failing to score, so a low-scoring draw remains the most logical match outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Corners-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Dangerous attacks0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Fouls-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
2Cards0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Goals scored / match0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals conceded / match1.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Average possession-1%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target / match-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1Shots on target-1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-33.3%Shot conversion-66.7%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
-1%Possession-1%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG for0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0xG against0
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Shooting quality

Nassaji Mazandaran: BalancedShams Azar Qazvin: Balanced
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nassaji Mazandaran
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 0%
Shams Azar Qazvin
LDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 103% better for: goals scored per match.

0.33 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.67 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 1.67 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran scoring profile: strong

Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: very strong

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
3Goals conceded (season)5
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1.33Average goals in match2.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals scored (last 5)2
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%2 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%2 goals67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%3 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%4 goals0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Nassaji Mazandaran - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.1 of 3 matches
34%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Scored in both halves0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
33%BTTS - last 567%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nassaji Mazandaran is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran · 0.67 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
100%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
67%No goal before half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
0%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin
100%No goal after half-time67%
Nassaji MazandaranShams Azar Qazvin

Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nassaji Mazandaran - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.670.00
Goals scored / match0.30.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.31.0
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal67%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.670.67
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match1.00.7
Average goals in match1.31.0
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nassaji Mazandaran
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nassaji Mazandaran

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
34%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Nassaji MazandaranLigaShams Azar Qazvin
Average goals in match 1.331.93 2.33
Both teams scored 33%34% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%24% 33%
Clean sheets 0%41% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%52% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%66% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
0.97
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nassaji MazandaranYellow cardAlireza Araste
  2. Shams Azar QazvinGoalMohammadreza RezaeiAssist: Amirmohammad Mohkamkar
  3. Nassaji MazandaranYellow cardBehrouz Norouzifard
  4. Shams Azar QazvinGoalMohammadreza Rezaei
  5. Shams Azar QazvinSubstitutionOn: Ali Jelokhani NiarakiOff: Mohammad Milad Sourgi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Nassaji Mazandaran 0:2 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Nassaji Mazandaran score 0.33 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.67. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Nassaji Mazandaran's matches and 67% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.

What form are Nassaji Mazandaran and Shams Azar Qazvin in?

Over the last 5 games Nassaji Mazandaran have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nassaji Mazandaran vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.