National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC: match statistics
National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
National Bank of Egypt played Ismaily SC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
National Bank of Egypt: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Ismaily SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
National Bank of Egypt scores 1.14 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Ismaily SC scores 0.46 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: National Bank of Egypt 50%, Ismaily SC 29%. Over 2.5: National Bank of Egypt 36%, Ismaily SC 25%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
National Bank of Egypt has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.04. National Bank of Egypt: 12.1 shots per match, Ismaily SC: 7.8.
Match halves
National Bank of Egypt: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.79. Ismaily SC: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.32.
Goals by minute
National Bank of Egypt: 76-90+ (12 goals). Ismaily SC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win (1) due to a clear advantage in form and attack: National Bank of Egypt scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches and won 4 of them, averaging 2.4 points per game, whereas Ismaily scored only 2 goals and averages 1.0 point in that period. Over the season the hosts have 32 goals vs 13 for the visitors, with a home goals average of 1.14 vs 0.25 for Ismaily on the road. Quality of chances also favors the hosts: home xG is 1.51 with 4.07 shots on target per match and a 9% conversion rate, versus opponents’ xG 1.05, 2.25 shots on target and a 3% conversion. Defensively Ismaily concede 0.94 goals on average away, but their xG against of 1.37 suggests they allow more high-quality chances; the hosts concede 1.00 goal per home match and control the ball for 57% possession on average versus 46% for the visitors. Given the advantage in goals (32 vs 13), superior xG and form (2.4 vs 1.0 points per game in the last 5), I assess the probabilities as: Home win 70%, Draw 20%, Ismaily win 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS as unlikely — 35% for "yes" and 65% for "no". The main reason is Ismaily's very poor scoring: seasonal away goals average just 0.25 per game and their season BTTS rate is only 13%. The home side has better figures (seasonal goals average 0.75 and 1.8 goals per game in the last 5, with last 5 BTTS at 80%), but the visitors have scored only 0.4 goals on average in their last 5 matches and had 20% BTTS, which significantly limits the chance of both teams scoring. Additionally, the visitors have a low shot conversion rate of 3% versus 10% for the hosts, and despite similar xG (1.03 for hosts vs 1.05 for visitors) the actual seasonal goals are 0.75 vs 0.25, suggesting Ismaily rarely convert chances. In a league context where BTTS is 46% and clean sheets occur in 69% of matches, the weight of statistical evidence favors No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.20 goals for National Bank of Egypt and 1.18 for Ismaily (total 2.38), calculating expected goals as the average of attack xG and opponent defense xG: (1.03+1.37)/2 = 1.20 and (1.05+1.31)/2 = 1.18. The hosts show markedly better shooting efficiency 10% vs 3% and more shots on target (2.92 vs 2.25), which supports expected goals for the home side despite seasonal average goals 0.75 vs 0.25. Seasonal metrics show the hosts had 58% of matches Over 2.5 goals (last 5: 80%), while Ismaily has 0% Over 2.5 and only 13% of matches with Both Teams to Score; this yields a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (around 43% probability) but a much stronger signal for Over 1.5 (approx. 69%). Given the summed xG of 2.38 and the hosts’ superiority in efficiency and form, I recommend Over 1.5 as the most reliable and strongest line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely: the home team were level at the break in 42% of matches and the visitors in 56% (around 49% on average), with half-time average goals of 0.25 for National Bank of Egypt and 0.06 for Ismaily. In the second half, however, the hosts show a clear advantage — in the last five matches they scored an average of 1.6 goals after the break versus 0.4 for the visitors, and in 100% of those five games they registered at least one second-half goal. Additionally, the hosts won 80% of their last five matches (visitors 20%) and recorded a second-half goal difference of +5, indicating frequent comebacks and taking control after the break. Considering that a home lead at the break occurs in only 17% of matches and a visitor lead in 6%, the strongest signal is a half-time draw and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| National Bank of Egypt | Ismaily SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
National Bank of Egypt is 140% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1 pts / match - Ismaily SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
National Bank of Egypt is 148% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt · 0.46 goals / match - Ismaily SC
National Bank of Egypt is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.86 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.18 goals / match - Ismaily SC
National Bank of Egypt scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while Ismaily SC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).
Ismaily SC scores in 36% of matches (10 of 28 matches), while National Bank of Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - National Bank of Egypt
Over / Under - Ismaily SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
National Bank of Egypt is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 0.82 pts / match - Ismaily SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
National Bank of Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ismaily SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
National Bank of Egypt
Ismaily SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| National Bank of Egypt | Liga | Ismaily SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 33% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 32% | 35% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 57% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | • 68% | 69% | • 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: National Bank of Egypt 1 - 0 - 0 Ismaily SC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished National Bank of Egypt 0:0 Ismaily SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC?
National Bank of Egypt score 1.14 goals per game on average and Ismaily SC 0.46. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 50% of National Bank of Egypt's matches and 29% of Ismaily SC's.
What form are National Bank of Egypt and Ismaily SC in?
Over the last 5 games National Bank of Egypt have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Ismaily SC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for National Bank of Egypt vs Ismaily SC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


