National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet: match statistics
National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
National Bank of Egypt played Petrojet in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
National Bank of Egypt: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Petrojet: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
National Bank of Egypt scores 1.10 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Petrojet scores 1.07 and concedes 1.14. League average: 1.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: National Bank of Egypt 48%, Petrojet 59%. Over 2.5: National Bank of Egypt 34%, Petrojet 41%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
National Bank of Egypt has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.34. National Bank of Egypt: 12.4 shots per match, Petrojet: 11.7.
Match halves
National Bank of Egypt: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.76. Petrojet: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
National Bank of Egypt: 76-90+ (12 goals). Petrojet: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.98 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
National Bank of Egypt hold the home-field edge: home xG averages 1.58 per match versus Petrojet's 1.36 xG away, and average possession is 58% compared to the visitors' 45%. Hosts average 14 shots and 4.2 on target per home match, while Petrojet record 12.07 shots and 3.13 on target on the road; NB has scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches, Petrojet 6. Defensively the home side also has the advantage — NB concedes 0.93 goals per home match and has 24 goals conceded this season, whereas Petrojet concede 1.13 away and have 33 goals conceded this season. Form supports the hosts: in the last 5 fixtures NB posted 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (average 2 points per game), while Petrojet are 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (average 1.6 points per game). Considering superior xG, possession and a lower goals-conceded average, I tip a home win, although the high draw rates (47% of NB home matches and 53% of Petrojet away matches ending level) increase the probability of a split of points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: 57% for National Bank and 60% for Petrojet, and in the last 5 matches both sides also register BTTS at 60% — i.e., in 3 of the last 5 games both teams scored. Seasonal goals averages are 1.21 for the home side and 0.93 for the away side, with goals conceded averages of 1.14 and 1.13 respectively, indicating both teams regularly both score and concede around 1 goal per game. In the last 5 fixtures the home team generates xG 1.72 versus the visitors’ xG 1.37 and has xG against 0.94 versus 1.62 for Petrojet, pointing to better chance creation by the hosts and greater defensive vulnerability at Petrojet. Additionally, Petrojet have conceded 33 goals this season compared to 24 conceded by National Bank, and shots on target averages are 4.0 for the home team and 3.13 for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of both sides finding the net. Considering the individual BTTS indicators (57% and 60%) exceed the league average of 46%, the strongest signal from the data is a “Yes” (Both Teams To Score).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts a total of about 2.87 expected goals: National Bank 1.47 xG, Petrojet 1.40 xG. Over the season National Bank scores an average of 1.21 goals (xG 1.32) and has 64% of matches over 1.5 and 50% over 2.5, while Petrojet scores an average of 0.93 goals (xG 1.36) and has 73% of matches over 1.5 and 33% over 2.5. In the last 5 matches National Bank has scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) with xG 1.72, and Petrojet 6 goals (1.2 per game) with xG 1.37, which increases the scoring tempo in both teams’ form. Combined xG and recent form yield probabilities of approximately: Over 1.5 ~78%, Over 2.5 ~55% and Over 3.5 ~32%. Therefore the strongest and safest signal from the available data is to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the home side draw at half in 64% of their matches and average 0.57 goals by half-time versus 0.40 for their opponents. Second-half data favor the hosts — matches involving the home team average 1.64 goals after the break, the hosts score on average 0.64 goals in the second half, and 86% of their fixtures see a goal after half-time, providing substantial scope for a turnaround. Season-to-date the hosts win 36% of matches versus 20% for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches the home team has a 60% win rate compared to 40% for the away side, which increases the likelihood of a final victory for the hosts. Additionally, xG is similar (1.32 for the hosts vs 1.36 for the visitors), but the home team register more on-target shots on average (4.0) and have a better conversion rate (11% vs 8%), supporting the chance of scoring after the break. Therefore I recommend HT/FT X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time) as the most reliable scenario based on the available numbers.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| National Bank of Egypt | Petrojet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
National Bank of Egypt is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.6 pts / match - Petrojet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
National Bank of Egypt is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.14 goals / match - Petrojet
National Bank of Egypt scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Petrojet keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
Petrojet scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while National Bank of Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - National Bank of Egypt
Over / Under - Petrojet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Petrojet is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.52 pts / match - Petrojet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
National Bank of Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Petrojet - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
National Bank of Egypt
Petrojet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| National Bank of Egypt | Liga | Petrojet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.93 | 1.98 | ▲ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 46% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 34% | 33% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | • 34% | 35% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 66% | 69% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: National Bank of Egypt 1 - 0 - 0 Petrojet. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished National Bank of Egypt 2:3 Petrojet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet?
National Bank of Egypt score 1.10 goals per game on average and Petrojet 1.07. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 48% of National Bank of Egypt's matches and 59% of Petrojet's.
What form are National Bank of Egypt and Petrojet in?
Over the last 5 games National Bank of Egypt have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Petrojet 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet?
The statistical background for National Bank of Egypt vs Petrojet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.