National Bank of Egypt vs Pyramids FC: match statistics
Pyramids FC displays significantly better form and efficiency than the hosts. They sit 2nd in the table with a record of 12 wins, 4 draws, and only 3 losses, while National Bank of Egypt is in 9th position with just 5 wins this season. Pyramids win 56% of their away matches, scoring an average of 1.89 goals, with a shot conversion rate of 14%, which is almost three times higher than the hosts' 5%. National Bank of Egypt has poor home form with only 11% wins and a staggering 67% draws, conceding an average of 0.89 goals with an xG Against of 1.06. The last 5 matches confirm the visitors' advantage: Pyramids scored 10 goals and averaged 2.4 points per match, while the hosts managed just 5 goals and 1.2 points. The hosts' negative goal difference (-2) compared to the visitors' positive record (+7) in home/away matches further supports a victory for Pyramids FC.
National Bank of Egypt vs Pyramids FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
National Bank of Egypt played Pyramids FC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 9 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
National Bank of Egypt: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pyramids FC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
National Bank of Egypt scores 0.95 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Pyramids FC scores 1.68 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: National Bank of Egypt 42%, Pyramids FC 53%. Over 2.5: National Bank of Egypt 26%, Pyramids FC 53%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.36. National Bank of Egypt: 11.8 shots per match, Pyramids FC: 15.3.
Match halves
National Bank of Egypt: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.53. Pyramids FC: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
National Bank of Egypt: 76-90+ (6 goals). Pyramids FC: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pyramids FC displays significantly better form and efficiency than the hosts. They sit 2nd in the table with a record of 12 wins, 4 draws, and only 3 losses, while National Bank of Egypt is in 9th position with just 5 wins this season. Pyramids win 56% of their away matches, scoring an average of 1.89 goals, with a shot conversion rate of 14%, which is almost three times higher than the hosts' 5%. National Bank of Egypt has poor home form with only 11% wins and a staggering 67% draws, conceding an average of 0.89 goals with an xG Against of 1.06. The last 5 matches confirm the visitors' advantage: Pyramids scored 10 goals and averaged 2.4 points per match, while the hosts managed just 5 goals and 1.2 points. The hosts' negative goal difference (-2) compared to the visitors' positive record (+7) in home/away matches further supports a victory for Pyramids FC.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| National Bank of Egypt | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pyramids FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 2.4 pts / match - Pyramids FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pyramids FC is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.68 goals / match - Pyramids FC
National Bank of Egypt is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.68 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt · 0.79 goals / match - Pyramids FC
National Bank of Egypt scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).
Pyramids FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while National Bank of Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - National Bank of Egypt
Over / Under - Pyramids FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pyramids FC is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt · 1.89 pts / match - Pyramids FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
National Bank of Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pyramids FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
National Bank of Egypt
Pyramids FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| National Bank of Egypt | Liga | Pyramids FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.63 | 2.03 | ▲ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 34% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 34% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 58% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 70% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of National Bank of Egypt vs Pyramids FC?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished National Bank of Egypt 0:1 Pyramids FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before National Bank of Egypt vs Pyramids FC?
National Bank of Egypt score 0.95 goals per game on average and Pyramids FC 1.68. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of National Bank of Egypt's matches and 53% of Pyramids FC's.
What form are National Bank of Egypt and Pyramids FC in?
Over the last 5 games National Bank of Egypt have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pyramids FC 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for National Bank of Egypt vs Pyramids FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.