Iran - Azadegan LeagueTakhti Sports ComplexData current as of 07 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Navad Urmia vs Ario Eslamshahr: match statistics

Navad Urmia vs Ario Eslamshahr: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia play Ario Eslamshahr in Azadegan League (Iran). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Takhti Sports Complex.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Ario Eslamshahr: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.63 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Ario Eslamshahr scores 0.44 and concedes 0.52. League average: 1.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 38%, Ario Eslamshahr 16%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 17%, Ario Eslamshahr 8%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Navad Urmia has higher xG: 0.95 vs 0.86. Navad Urmia: 1.5 shots per match, Ario Eslamshahr: 2.8.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. Ario Eslamshahr: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Ario Eslamshahr: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.49 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.63Goals scored / match0.44
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.92Goals conceded / match0.52
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
13%Average possession28%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.04Shots on target / match0.88
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.46Shots per match2.76
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.04Shots on target0.88
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
42.9%Shot conversion15.9%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
13%Possession28%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.95xG for0.86
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
1.39xG against0.8
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingArio Eslamshahr: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
Accuracy (shots on target)3%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.650.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)15.750.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ario Eslamshahr is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1 pts / match - Ario Eslamshahr

Navad Urmia
LLLWL
Season result split
17% W42% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-10-10
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.34Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Ario Eslamshahr
LLWDD
Season result split
24% W44% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-11-8
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.67Opponent xG: 0.35BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navad Urmia is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

0.63 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.44 goals / match - Ario Eslamshahr

Ario Eslamshahr is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.52 goals / match - Ario Eslamshahr

Navad Urmia scoring profile: mixed

Navad Urmia scores in 54% of matches (13 of 24 matches), while Ario Eslamshahr keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).

Ario Eslamshahr scoring profile: mixed

Ario Eslamshahr scores in 32% of matches (8 of 25 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

15Goals scored (season)11
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
22Goals conceded (season)13
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
1.54Average goals in match0.96
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
2Goals scored (last 5)1
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal32%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
4%2 goals8%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
4%3 goals4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal48%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
17%2 goals4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
4%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
4%Scored in both halves8%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

BTTS and goal count

8%Min. 3 goals and BTTS8%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
20%BTTS - last 50%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

2nd half

54%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navad Urmia - half-time state
17% leading54% draw29% trailing
Ario Eslamshahr - half-time state
16% leading60% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.08
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.71Average goals (1st half)0.48
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
63%Clean sheet before half-time72%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
75%No goal before half-time80%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.24
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
0.71Average goals (2nd half)0.48
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
63%Clean sheet after half-time76%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr
67%No goal after half-time80%
Navad UrmiaArio Eslamshahr

Navad Urmia - second-half results

17% W63% R21% P
25
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ario Eslamshahr - second-half results

20% W60% R20% P
27
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ario Eslamshahr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ario Eslamshahr
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
31%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Ario Eslamshahr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaArio Eslamshahr
Average goals in match 1.541.49 0.96
Both teams scored 38%31% 16%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%21% 8%
Clean sheets 29%47% 52%
Goal before half-time 54%45% 44%
Goal after half-time 54%54% 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.49
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.59
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 0 - 1 Ario Eslamshahr. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ario Eslamshahr
1 : 0
Navad Urmia