Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia play Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 26 December 2025 at 12:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 30%, Mes Kerman 26%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 21%, Mes Kerman 15%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.79. Navad Urmia: 0.9 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 3.6.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-1Shots-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-1Shots on target-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0xG0
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-1Corners-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0Dangerous attacks0
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-1Fouls-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-1Cards-1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.48Goals scored / match0.68
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
1.3Goals conceded / match0.53
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
12%Average possession26%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-0.15Shots on target / match1.35
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

0.94Shots per match3.59
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
-0.15Shots on target1.35
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
51.6%Shot conversion18.9%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
12%Possession26%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.79xG for1.1
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
1.3xG against1.03
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingMes Kerman: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
Accuracy (shots on target)-16%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.840.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Navad Urmia
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W36% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-17
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Mes Kerman
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W44% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Kerman is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Mes Kerman is 145% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).

Mes Kerman scoring profile: strong

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

16Goals scored (season)23
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
43Goals conceded (season)18
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
1.79Average goals in match1.21
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
1Goals scored (last 5)5
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
13Goals conceded (last 5)3
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

How often they score at least...

42%1 goal53%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
3%2 goals12%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
3%3 goals3%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal44%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
33%2 goals9%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
12%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
6%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time6%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
3%Scored in both halves6%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

BTTS and goal count

9%Min. 3 goals and BTTS12%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
20%BTTS - last 540%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time35%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Navad Urmia - half-time state
12% leading55% draw33% trailing
Mes Kerman - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.24
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.44
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
61%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
79%No goal before half-time76%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.24
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
0.79Average goals (2nd half)0.68
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
58%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman
76%No goal after half-time68%
Navad UrmiaMes Kerman

Navad Urmia - second-half results

12% W58% R30% P
30
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W53% R24% P
42
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+12.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaMes Kerman
Average goals in match 1.791.59 1.21
Both teams scored 30%30% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%22% 15%
Clean sheets 27%46% 56%
Goal before half-time 52%46% 35%
Goal after half-time 55%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 0 - 1 Mes Kerman. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?

The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?

Navad Urmia score 0.48 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 26% of Mes Kerman's.

What form are Navad Urmia and Mes Kerman in?

Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?

The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.