Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Navad Urmia played Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 26 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Navad Urmia: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Mes Kerman: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Navad Urmia scores 0.73 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.50 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Navad Urmia 40%, Mes Kerman 19%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 13%, Mes Kerman 13%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Navad Urmia: 2.1 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 4.1.
Match halves
Navad Urmia: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Navad Urmia: 61-75 (3 goals). Mes Kerman: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.50 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 13% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.48 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 2.70 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mes Kerman is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.8 pts / match - Mes Kerman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.5 goals / match - Mes Kerman
Mes Kerman is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.5 goals / match - Mes Kerman
Navad Urmia scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 matches).
Mes Kerman scores in 44% of matches (7 of 16 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Kerman is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.38 pts / match - Mes Kerman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Navad Urmia
Mes Kerman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.40 | 1.50 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 31% | ▼ 19% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 40% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 60% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
Navad Urmia score 0.73 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.50. The Azadegan League average is 1.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Navad Urmia's matches and 19% of Mes Kerman's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Mes Kerman in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mes Kerman 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman?
The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Mes Kerman — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.