Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: match statistics

125%(3.48)
X35%(2.82)
240%(2.13)

Mes Shahr-e Babak is second in the table and is in significantly better form than Navad Urmia, who are in 15th place. The visitors have won 11 matches this season with only 2 defeats, while the hosts have recorded just 3 wins and as many as 7 losses. The form from the last five matches clearly favors the away side – 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2) compared to 0 wins and 3 defeats for the hosts (PPG 0.4). Mes Shahr-e Babak also boasts a superior goal difference and defensive efficiency, evidenced by a 60% clean sheet rate in away matches. Considering the offensive and defensive statistics of both teams, along with the hosts' tendency for draws at home (78%), an away win or a draw is most likely, with a slight edge for a Mes Shahr-e Babak victory.

Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia played Mes Shahr-e Babak in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Mes Shahr-e Babak: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.70 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 1.05 and concedes 0.52. League average: 1.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 45%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 38%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 20%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 19%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Shahr-e Babak has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.05. Navad Urmia: 1.9 shots per match, Mes Shahr-e Babak: 4.9.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.40. Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (4 goals). Mes Shahr-e Babak: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.54 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mes Shahr-e Babak is second in the table and is in significantly better form than Navad Urmia, who are in 15th place. The visitors have won 11 matches this season with only 2 defeats, while the hosts have recorded just 3 wins and as many as 7 losses. The form from the last five matches clearly favors the away side – 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2) compared to 0 wins and 3 defeats for the hosts (PPG 0.4). Mes Shahr-e Babak also boasts a superior goal difference and defensive efficiency, evidenced by a 60% clean sheet rate in away matches. Considering the offensive and defensive statistics of both teams, along with the hosts' tendency for draws at home (78%), an away win or a draw is most likely, with a slight edge for a Mes Shahr-e Babak victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
-1Shots-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
-1Shots on target-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0xG0
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
-1Corners-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0Dangerous attacks0
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
-1Fouls-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
-1Cards-1
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.7Goals scored / match1.05
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.9Goals conceded / match0.52
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
13%Average possession32%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.2Shots on target / match2.29
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.85Shots per match4.86
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.2Shots on target2.29
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
37.8%Shot conversion21.6%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
13%Possession32%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
1.05xG for1.14
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
1.28xG against1.08
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingMes Shahr-e Babak: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
Accuracy (shots on target)11%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.570.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)3.500.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mes Shahr-e Babak is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 2.2 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak

Navad Urmia
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W50% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-10-7
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-0
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mes Shahr-e Babak
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
52% W38% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-2
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-1
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.56Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Shahr-e Babak is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

0.7 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 1.05 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak

Mes Shahr-e Babak is 73% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.52 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak

Navad Urmia scoring profile: mixed

Navad Urmia scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 matches).

Mes Shahr-e Babak scoring profile: very strong

Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

14Goals scored (season)22
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
18Goals conceded (season)11
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
1.6Average goals in match1.57
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal76%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
5%2 goals29%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
5%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal48%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
15%2 goals5%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
5%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Mes Shahr-e Babak - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 21 matches
33%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
5%Scored in both halves19%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

BTTS and goal count

10%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
60%BTTS - last 540%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time5%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Shahr-e Babak is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 2 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak

Navad Urmia - half-time state
15% leading55% draw30% trailing
Mes Shahr-e Babak - half-time state
52% leading43% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.05
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.62
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
60%Clean sheet before half-time95%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
75%No goal before half-time48%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.19
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
0.75Average goals (2nd half)0.95
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
65%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak
60%No goal after half-time57%
Navad UrmiaMes Shahr-e Babak

Navad Urmia - second-half results

20% W65% R15% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results

19% W62% R19% P
42
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mes Shahr-e Babak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Shahr-e Babak
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Mes Shahr-e Babak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaMes Shahr-e Babak
Average goals in match 1.601.54 1.57
Both teams scored 45%33% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%22% 19%
Clean sheets 30%45% 52%
Goal before half-time 55%47% 57%
Goal after half-time 55%58% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.54
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.63
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
47%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Mes Shahr-e Babak
1 : 1
Navad Urmia

FAQ

What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?

The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 0:1 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?

Navad Urmia score 0.70 goals per game on average and Mes Shahr-e Babak 1.05. The Azadegan League average is 1.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Navad Urmia's matches and 38% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's.

What form are Navad Urmia and Mes Shahr-e Babak in?

Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Mes Shahr-e Babak 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.