Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Navad Urmia play Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 3 July 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Takhti Sports Complex. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Sanat Naft: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 1.09 and concedes 0.62. League average: 1.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Navad Urmia 30%, Sanat Naft 38%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 21%, Sanat Naft 26%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.09 vs 0.79. Navad Urmia: 0.9 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 3.7.
Match halves
Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Sanat Naft: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Sanat Naft is the clear favorite: they sit 4th with 13 wins this season versus Navad Urmia’s 4, with goal difference 30-20 (+10) vs 15-34 (-19) for the hosts. The visitors create more chances — on average 7.33 shots per match with 4.33 on target and xG 1.12 against xG conceded 1.09 — while Navad have failed to score in their last 5 matches. Sanat Naft’s away defence is tighter (0.67 goals conceded per game) than the home defence’s (1.00 goals conceded), and Navad have shipped 12 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.4 per game). In the short term Sanat Naft average 1.0 point per game over the last 5, versus the hosts’ 0.2, which further favors the visitors, despite the visitors having 60% of away matches without scoring. Given the superiority in chance creation and the better season-long record, I forecast an away win while expecting a low total goal count.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -16% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.84 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 1.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 127% better for: goals scored per match.
0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 1.09 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Sanat Naft is 110% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.62 goals / match - Sanat Naft
Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).
Sanat Naft scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Navad Urmia
Over / Under — Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanat Naft is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.09 pts / match - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Navad Urmia
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.79 | 1.59 | ▲ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 21% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 46% | • 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 57% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 0 - 1 Sanat Naft. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:4 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
Navad Urmia score 0.48 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.09. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 38% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Sanat Naft 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.