Iran - Azadegan LeagueTakhti Sports ComplexData current as of 08 September 2026

Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: match statistics

Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia
1 : 4half-time 1:3
Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft

Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia played Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 3 July 2026. Venue: Takhti Sports Complex. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sanat Naft: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.50 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 0.97 and concedes 0.65. League average: 1.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 30%, Sanat Naft 39%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 17%, Sanat Naft 26%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.09 vs 0.79. Navad Urmia: 1.1 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 4.1.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.27. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Sanat Naft: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.54 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sanat Naft is the clear favorite: they sit 4th with 13 wins this season versus Navad Urmia’s 4, with goal difference 30-20 (+10) vs 15-34 (-19) for the hosts. The visitors create more chances — on average 7.33 shots per match with 4.33 on target and xG 1.12 against xG conceded 1.09 — while Navad have failed to score in their last 5 matches. Sanat Naft’s away defence is tighter (0.67 goals conceded per game) than the home defence’s (1.00 goals conceded), and Navad have shipped 12 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.4 per game). In the short term Sanat Naft average 1.0 point per game over the last 5, versus the hosts’ 0.2, which further favors the visitors, despite the visitors having 60% of away matches without scoring. Given the superiority in chance creation and the better season-long record, I forecast an away win while expecting a low total goal count.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - No with 70% probability (vs 30% for Yes) because season-long and recent metrics indicate an inclination toward clean sheets. Navad Urmia averages 1.31 goals this season but scored 0.0 goals in the last 5 matches with BTTS 0%, significantly reducing the hosts' likelihood to add a goal. Sanat Naft records 0.6 goals per game season-to-date and a season BTTS rate of 27%; in their last 5 matches the away side averaged 0.6 goals and had BTTS 40%, showing no consistent tendency for both teams to score. Both teams have high clean sheet shares: Navad 44% and Sanat 47%, while the league BTTS level is only 30%, favoring outcomes without both teams scoring. Although Sanat generates more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4), their shot conversion is lower (9% vs 13%) and xG against Navad is only 0.68, so the realistic potential for both sides to score concurrently appears limited.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Navad Urmia scores an average of 1.31 goals per game with xG 1.08, while Sanat Naft scores 0.60 on average with xG 1.12; averaging the home attack and the opponent’s defense yields a forecast of 1.09 xG for Navad and 0.90 xG for Sanat, totaling 1.99 expected goals. The combined xG of both teams is 2.20, whereas the actual seasonal average goals scored is 1.91 (1.31+0.60), suggesting a match around ~2 goals. Seasonal shares of matches with over 2.5 goals are 31% for the home side and 20% for the away side, and over 3.5 occurred in only 13% of home games and 0% of away games, which reduces the likelihood of high-scoring outcomes. A Poisson model with an expected total of 1.99 goals gives about a 59% chance of at least 2 goals (over 1.5), ~32% for over 2.5 and ~14% for over 3.5; consequently the strongest and safest signal from the data is under 3.5 (≈86% chance), therefore I recommend playing under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), because draws at the break occur very frequently — the home side draws in 81% of their matches and the visitors in 73%. Navad has the advantage over the full 90 minutes: on average 1.31 goals scored per match versus Sanat Naft’s 0.6, and an average of 2.06 points per match versus the opponents’ 1.2, which increases their chances of a win after the break. At half-time the home team scores on average 0.44 goals and the visitors 0.0, while in the second half the hosts score at least one goal in 69% of matches, indicating decisions coming after the break. The home defence concedes xG of 0.68 compared to 1.09 for the visitors, and with shot conversion rates of 13% versus 9% the hosts are more efficient; therefore I assign X/1 45% and X/X 25% as the secondary scenario, while leads for the visitors at half-time are rated very low (0% half-time leads).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-1Shots-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0xG0
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-1Corners-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0Dangerous attacks0
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-1Cards-1
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.5Goals scored / match0.97
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
1.13Goals conceded / match0.65
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
13%Average possession26%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-0.07Shots on target / match1.13
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.13Shots per match4.13
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
-0.07Shots on target1.13
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
44.1%Shot conversion23.4%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
13%Possession26%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.79xG for1.09
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
1.3xG against0.84
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingSanat Naft: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)-6%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.700.26
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.86

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sanat Naft is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1 pts / match - Sanat Naft

Navad Urmia
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W40% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-14
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.26Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Sanat Naft
LLWDD
Season result split
42% W39% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-12-6
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft is 94% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.97 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Sanat Naft is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.65 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 43% of matches (13 of 30 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 matches).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: strong

Sanat Naft scores in 61% of matches (19 of 31 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

15Goals scored (season)30
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
34Goals conceded (season)20
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
1.63Average goals in match1.61
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0Goals scored (last 5)3
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
12Goals conceded (last 5)6
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal61%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%2 goals26%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%3 goals6%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0%4 goals3%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal55%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
27%2 goals10%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
7%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time16%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%Scored in both halves13%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

7%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0%BTTS - last 540%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

2nd half

53%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navad Urmia - half-time state
13% leading57% draw30% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
6% leading77% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)0.97
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.73Average goals (1st half)0.58
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
63%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
80%No goal before half-time77%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.74
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
0.8Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
60%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft
73%No goal after half-time48%
Navad UrmiaSanat Naft

Navad Urmia - second-half results

13% W60% R27% P
29
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

42% W48% R10% P
30
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding700%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-5-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
8
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
7
31-45
8
3
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaSanat Naft
Average goals in match 1.631.54 1.61
Both teams scored 30%30% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%21% 26%
Clean sheets 30%47% 45%
Goal before half-time 50%46% 39%
Goal after half-time 53%56% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.54
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.65
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
14%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sanat NaftGoalTaleb Rikani
  2. Sanat NaftGoalTaleb Rikani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 0 - 1 Sanat Naft. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?

The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:4 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?

Navad Urmia score 0.50 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.97. The Azadegan League average is 1.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 39% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Navad Urmia and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sanat Naft 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?

The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.