Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Navad Urmia play Shenavarsazi Qeshm in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 14:30.
Current form
Navad Urmia: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Navad Urmia scores 0.48 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.68 and concedes 1.06. League average: 1.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Navad Urmia 30%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 32%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 21%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 26%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Shenavarsazi Qeshm has higher xG: 0.91 vs 0.79. Navad Urmia: 0.9 shots per match, Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 1.0.
Match halves
Navad Urmia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.24. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.35.
Goals by minute
Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -16% | -9% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.84 | 0.88 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
0.48 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.68 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Shenavarsazi Qeshm is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 1.06 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Navad Urmia scores in 42% of matches (14 of 33 matches), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).
Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Navad Urmia
Over / Under — Shenavarsazi Qeshm
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Navad Urmia
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Shenavarsazi Qeshm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.79 | 1.59 | ▲ 1.74 |
| Both teams scored | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 21% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 46% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 52% | 46% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 57% | • 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 1 - 0 Shenavarsazi Qeshm. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Navad Urmia and Shenavarsazi Qeshm play?
Navad Urmia face Shenavarsazi Qeshm on 14 May 2026 in Azadegan League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm?
Navad Urmia score 0.48 goals per game on average and Shenavarsazi Qeshm 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 32% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Shenavarsazi Qeshm in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Shenavarsazi Qeshm 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.