Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: match statistics

Navad Urmia vs Shenavarsazi Qeshm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navad Urmia play Shenavarsazi Qeshm in Azadegan League (Iran). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Current form

Navad Urmia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navad Urmia scores 0.64 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.48 and concedes 0.96. League average: 1.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navad Urmia 41%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 26%. Over 2.5: Navad Urmia 18%, Shenavarsazi Qeshm 22%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Navad Urmia has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.90. Navad Urmia: 1.6 shots per match, Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 1.4.

Match halves

Navad Urmia: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.36. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.26.

Goals by minute

Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (4 goals). Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.54 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.64Goals scored / match0.48
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.91Goals conceded / match0.96
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
12%Average possession16%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.09Shots on target / match0.04
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.59Shots per match1.43
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.09Shots on target0.04
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
40%Shot conversion33.3%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
12%Possession16%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
1.05xG for0.9
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
1.28xG against1.39
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

Shooting quality

Navad Urmia: Counter-attackingShenavarsazi Qeshm: Counter-attacking
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
Accuracy (shots on target)6%3%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.660.63
Finishing (goals per shot on target)7.1112.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm is 700% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Navad Urmia · 1.6 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm

Navad Urmia
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W45% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-10-9
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
DWLDW
Season result split
22% W35% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navad Urmia is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

0.64 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.48 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm

Navad Urmia is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Navad Urmia · 0.96 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm

Navad Urmia scoring profile: mixed

Navad Urmia scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Shenavarsazi Qeshm scoring profile: mixed

Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

14Goals scored (season)11
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
20Goals conceded (season)22
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
1.55Average goals in match1.43
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
2Goals scored (last 5)5
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal43%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
5%2 goals4%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
5%3 goals0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal61%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
14%2 goals26%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
5%3 goals9%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0%4 goals0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

26%
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 23 matches
33%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time4%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
5%Scored in both halves0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

BTTS and goal count

9%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
40%BTTS - last 560%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time48%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navad Urmia - half-time state
14% leading59% draw27% trailing
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - half-time state
13% leading61% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.22
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.64Average goals (1st half)0.61
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
64%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
77%No goal before half-time83%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)0.96
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
0.77Average goals (2nd half)0.7
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
59%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm
64%No goal after half-time74%
Navad UrmiaShenavarsazi Qeshm

Navad Urmia - second-half results

18% W59% R23% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results

9% W70% R22% P
23
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding169%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
0
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Shenavarsazi Qeshm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Navad UrmiaLigaShenavarsazi Qeshm
Average goals in match 1.551.54 1.43
Both teams scored 41%33% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%22% 22%
Clean sheets 27%45% 39%
Goal before half-time 50%47% 39%
Goal after half-time 59%57% 48%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.54
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.92
Home goals / match
0.62
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
47%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Navad Urmia 0 - 1 - 0 Shenavarsazi Qeshm. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm
1 : 1
Navad Urmia