Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueMarkaziy StadionData current as of 23 July 2026

Navbahor vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Navbahor crest
Navbahor
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum

Navbahor vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Navbahor play Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 23 July 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Navbahor: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Qizilqum: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Navbahor scores 1.31 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 0.77 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Navbahor 54%, Qizilqum 38%. Over 2.5: Navbahor 38%, Qizilqum 38%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Navbahor has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.19. Navbahor: 13.2 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.8.

Match halves

Navbahor: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38. Qizilqum: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Navbahor: 0-15 (6 goals). Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Navbahor (3rd) are favorites for the three points against Qizilqum (13th): the hosts have scored 16 goals in their last 5 matches, while the visitors only 6. At home Navbahor averages 1.4 goals with 13.8 shots and 4.4 shots on target per game, with a conversion rate of 10%, whereas Qizilqum on the road only averages 0.6 goals with 9.4 shots and a 6% conversion. Navbahor produces higher expected goals — xG 1.54 versus the visitors' 1.18 — and concedes fewer expected goals (xG against 0.94 vs 1.43), indicating better quality of created chances and a more stable defense. Additionally, the hosts average 1.6 points over the last 5 matches compared to Qizilqum's 0.6; the visitors have conceded 9 goals in their last 5 fixtures versus 5 for Navbahor, and Qizilqum fail to score in 60% of away games while Navbahor fail to score at home in only 20% of matches. Considering the possession advantage (62% vs 36%), higher shots on target (4.4 vs 2.8) and superior efficiency, I tip the home win; I estimate 72% for Navbahor, 16% for a draw and 12% for a Qizilqum win.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
NavbahorQizilqum
10Shots9
NavbahorQizilqum
5Shots on target4
NavbahorQizilqum
1.47xG1.11
NavbahorQizilqum
9Corners2
NavbahorQizilqum
67Dangerous attacks36
NavbahorQizilqum
-1Fouls-1
NavbahorQizilqum
0Cards1
NavbahorQizilqum

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.31Goals scored / match0.77
NavbahorQizilqum
0.92Goals conceded / match1.38
NavbahorQizilqum
57%Average possession41%
NavbahorQizilqum
4.69Shots on target / match2.77
NavbahorQizilqum

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match9.85
NavbahorQizilqum
4.69Shots on target2.77
NavbahorQizilqum
9.9%Shot conversion7.8%
NavbahorQizilqum
57%Possession41%
NavbahorQizilqum
1.57xG for1.19
NavbahorQizilqum
1.1xG against1.37
NavbahorQizilqum

Shooting quality

Navbahor: BalancedQizilqum: Balanced
NavbahorQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)35%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Qizilqum is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Navbahor · 1 pts / match - Qizilqum

Navbahor
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
46% W23% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-4
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Qizilqum
WDLLD
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navbahor is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Navbahor · 0.77 goals / match - Qizilqum

Navbahor is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Navbahor · 1.38 goals / match - Qizilqum

Navbahor scoring profile: very strong

Navbahor scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Qizilqum scoring profile: mixed

Qizilqum scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

17Goals scored (season)10
NavbahorQizilqum
12Goals conceded (season)18
NavbahorQizilqum
2.23Average goals in match2.15
NavbahorQizilqum
5Goals scored (last 5)4
NavbahorQizilqum
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
NavbahorQizilqum

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal54%
NavbahorQizilqum
46%2 goals23%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%3 goals0%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%4 goals0%
NavbahorQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal77%
NavbahorQizilqum
23%2 goals38%
NavbahorQizilqum
8%3 goals15%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%4 goals8%
NavbahorQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time15%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NavbahorQizilqum
8%Scored in both halves15%
NavbahorQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
NavbahorQizilqum
80%BTTS - last 560%
NavbahorQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
NavbahorQizilqum
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
NavbahorQizilqum
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
NavbahorQizilqum

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
NavbahorQizilqum
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
NavbahorQizilqum
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NavbahorQizilqum

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navbahor is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.77 pts / match - Navbahor · 1.08 pts / match - Qizilqum

Navbahor - half-time state
38% leading62% draw0% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.77Points per match (1st half)1.08
NavbahorQizilqum
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.38
NavbahorQizilqum
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
NavbahorQizilqum
1.31Average goals (1st half)1.15
NavbahorQizilqum
62%Clean sheet before half-time46%
NavbahorQizilqum
38%No goal before half-time69%
NavbahorQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.15
NavbahorQizilqum
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
NavbahorQizilqum
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
NavbahorQizilqum
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1
NavbahorQizilqum
54%Clean sheet after half-time54%
NavbahorQizilqum
69%No goal after half-time62%
NavbahorQizilqum

Navbahor - second-half results

23% W38% R38% P
23
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - second-half results

23% W46% R31% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navbahor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Navbahor
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Navbahor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 35% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

NavbahorLigaQizilqum
Average goals in match 2.232.63 2.15
Both teams scored 54%57% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%53% 38%
Clean sheets 38%25% 23%
Goal before half-time 62%69% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%78% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Navbahor 1 - 0 - 1 Qizilqum. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Navbahor Namangan
1 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
3 : 2
FK Navbahor Namangan

FAQ

What was the result of Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 1:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and Qizilqum?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 1, Qizilqum won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

Navbahor score 1.31 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.77. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Navbahor's matches and 38% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Navbahor and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Qizilqum 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs Qizilqum?

The statistical background for Navbahor vs Qizilqum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.