Navbahor vs Qizilqum: match statistics
Navbahor vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Navbahor played Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 23 July 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Navbahor: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Qizilqum: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Navbahor scores 1.33 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 0.75 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Navbahor 50%, Qizilqum 33%. Over 2.5: Navbahor 42%, Qizilqum 42%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Navbahor has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.20. Navbahor: 13.5 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.9.
Match halves
Navbahor: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.42. Qizilqum: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Navbahor: 0-15 (5 goals). Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Navbahor (3rd) are favorites for the three points against Qizilqum (13th): the hosts have scored 16 goals in their last 5 matches, while the visitors only 6. At home Navbahor averages 1.4 goals with 13.8 shots and 4.4 shots on target per game, with a conversion rate of 10%, whereas Qizilqum on the road only averages 0.6 goals with 9.4 shots and a 6% conversion. Navbahor produces higher expected goals — xG 1.54 versus the visitors' 1.18 — and concedes fewer expected goals (xG against 0.94 vs 1.43), indicating better quality of created chances and a more stable defense. Additionally, the hosts average 1.6 points over the last 5 matches compared to Qizilqum's 0.6; the visitors have conceded 9 goals in their last 5 fixtures versus 5 for Navbahor, and Qizilqum fail to score in 60% of away games while Navbahor fail to score at home in only 20% of matches. Considering the possession advantage (62% vs 36%), higher shots on target (4.4 vs 2.8) and superior efficiency, I tip the home win; I estimate 72% for Navbahor, 16% for a draw and 12% for a Qizilqum win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment BTTS - Yes is more likely. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% (Navbahor 60% and Qizilqum 60%), versus the league seasonal average of 55%. Both sides produce comparable xG: 1.21 for Navbahor and 1.18 for Qizilqum (combined ~2.39), and shots on target 2.57 vs 2.8 indicate realistic scoring opportunities from both teams. Recent scoring form supports this — Navbahor scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0), while Qizilqum scored 6 and conceded 9 (1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded), so both teams have recently both scored and conceded. Seasonal data is mixed: Navbahor has seasonal BTTS 57% and concedes on average 1.71 goals with only 14% clean sheets, while Qizilqum shows divergent seasonal metrics (BTTS 0% but 40% clean sheets and 60% matches without conceding), yet their recent 5-match form favors a higher probability of both teams scoring. In summary, considering last 5 matches BTTS 60%/60%, xG 1.21/1.18 and recent average goals 3.2 vs 1.2 plus seasonal conceded 1.71 vs 1.0, I assess BTTS - Yes at 68% and No at 32%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Navbahor has averaged 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals in 5) with xG 2.16, while Qizilqum has 1.2 goals and xG 1.23 over their last 5, giving the home side a clear offensive advantage. Over the season Navbahor at home has 71% of matches over 1.5 and 71% over 2.5, whereas Qizilqum have 60% over 1.5 away but 0% over 2.5, so the 2.5 line is less clear. Seasonary xG for the hosts is 1.21 versus xG against the visitors 1.43, and considering recent form I project the hosts for about 1.75 goals. For the visitors I forecast around 0.95 goals (xG_for_away 1.18, low shot conversion 6%), giving an expected total of 2.70 goals; this is a strong signal for Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leading at half-time and winning full-time). Navbahor led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and averaged 1.6 first-half goals, while Qizilqum only has 0.2 goals by half-time. In the last 5 games the home side scored an average of 3.2 goals per match versus 1.2 for the visitors, and xG of 1.21 versus 1.18 plus a higher shot conversion rate (8% vs 6%) confirm Navbahor’s offensive edge. Seasonally the picture is less one-sided — Navbahor concedes on average 1.71 goals per match and 1.14 in the first half, and Qizilqum have 80% clean halves at the break, which explains some instability risk. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the home team taking the lead at the break and maintaining it until the end, but alternatives such as X/1 or X/X remain possible due to defensive vulnerabilities in both teams.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Navbahor | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qizilqum is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Navbahor · 1.4 pts / match - Qizilqum
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navbahor is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Navbahor · 0.75 goals / match - Qizilqum
Navbahor is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.92 goals / match - Navbahor · 1.42 goals / match - Qizilqum
Navbahor scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Qizilqum scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navbahor
Over / Under - Qizilqum
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navbahor is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / match - Navbahor · 1.08 pts / match - Qizilqum
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navbahor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Navbahor
Qizilqum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Navbahor | Liga | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.25 | 2.64 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 53% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 25% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Navbahor 1 - 0 - 1 Qizilqum. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Navbahor vs Qizilqum?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Navbahor 1:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Navbahor and Qizilqum?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Navbahor won 1, Qizilqum won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Navbahor vs Qizilqum?
Navbahor score 1.33 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.75. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Navbahor's matches and 33% of Qizilqum's.
What form are Navbahor and Qizilqum in?
Over the last 5 games Navbahor have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navbahor vs Qizilqum?
The statistical background for Navbahor vs Qizilqum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


