ND Slovan Ljubljana vs Tabor Sežana: match statistics
ND Slovan Ljubljana vs Tabor Sežana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
ND Slovan Ljubljana played Tabor Sežana in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
ND Slovan Ljubljana: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tabor Sežana: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
ND Slovan Ljubljana scores 0.96 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Tabor Sežana scores 1.21 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: ND Slovan Ljubljana 54%, Tabor Sežana 39%. Over 2.5: ND Slovan Ljubljana 57%, Tabor Sežana 39%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Tabor Sežana has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.35. ND Slovan Ljubljana: 9.8 shots per match, Tabor Sežana: 12.0.
Match halves
ND Slovan Ljubljana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.57. Tabor Sežana: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
ND Slovan Ljubljana: 76-90+ (6 goals). Tabor Sežana: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Tabor Sežana: they have 14 wins this season versus ND Slovan Ljubljana’s 8 and sit 5th compared to 12th. In goal difference the visitors have scored 34 and conceded 28 (+6) against the hosts’ 27 scored and 50 conceded (-23). Sežana offers superior offensive quality — averaging 1.57 goals per game with xG 1.66 versus the hosts’ 1.00 goals and xG 1.52; the visitors register 5.29 shots on target per game compared to Slovan’s 3.85 and have a conversion rate of 13% vs 10%. Slovan fail to score in 36% of home matches, while Tabor are goalless on only 7% of away trips. Defensively the edge is also with Sežana — Tabor concede 1.36 goals per game and keep clean sheets in 43% of away matches, whereas Slovan concede 1.64 at home and have 21% clean sheets. Form is a warning: in the last 5 matches Slovan have scored 4 goals, hold a 1-1-3 record and average 0.8 points per game, while Tabor have lost all 5 most recent matches, scoring only 2 and conceding 9. Taking into account Sežana’s seasonal advantage in attack, xG and defence, but also the visitors’ poor recent run, I predict an away win, albeit with a modest margin.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Looking at seasonal metrics, ND Slovan has a low BTTS 21% and scores 0.86 goals on average while keeping a clean sheet in 50% of matches, whereas Tabor has BTTS 57%, scores 1.57 goals and concedes 1.36 on average. However, in the last 5 matches the home side shows BTTS at 60% and concedes 2.2 goals on average, while the visitors conceded 1.8 in those 5 games, indicating increased susceptibility for both teams to concede. Tabor’s attack produces xG 1.66 versus Slovan’s defensive xG conceded 1.19, and the visitors average 5.29 shots on target compared to the hosts’ 3.71, which raises the likelihood that both teams will find the net. Against this stands Slovan’s low season percentage of matches over 2.5 goals (7%) and their weaker shot conversion 7%, but the visitors’ clear finishing rate 13% and the hosts’ poor defense in recent games (2.2 conceded) offset that advantage. Considering the visitors’ 57% seasonal BTTS, the hosts’ 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches and the visitors’ higher xG and shots on target, I assign the 'Both Teams To Score - Yes' scenario a 64% probability, with 36% for 'No' (No BTTS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model forecasts a total of approximately 2.91 goals: Slovan 1.48 (attacking xG 1.54 vs xG conceded to Tabor 1.41) and Tabor 1.43 (attacking xG 1.66 vs xG conceded to Slovan 1.19). The visitors demonstrate superior attacking efficiency — averaging 5.29 SOT and a 13% conversion rate versus the hosts’ 3.71 SOT and 7% conversion — which increases the likelihood of Tabor scoring. Seasonal indicators show Tabor had 79% of matches over 1.5 goals and 71% over 2.5, while Slovan sits at 50% and 7% respectively; the league average is 2.81 goals per match. Considering the xG of 2.91, the visitors’ higher efficiency and historical rates, Over 1.5 stands out strongest (approx. 72%), Over 2.5 has a moderate edge (~58%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~18%). Therefore I recommend backing the over at 1.5 as the strongest signal based on the provided figures.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The away side holds an offensive edge: average goals per match 1.57 versus the home 0.86, xG 1.66 vs 1.54 and shot conversion 13% vs 7%, indicating greater efficiency from Tabor. At half-time the hosts average 0.36 goals and the away team 0.64; the away team led at the break in 50% of matches compared to 21% for the hosts, so the model projects a half-time draw at about 46% and the away team leading at about 36%. After the break the away team scores on average 0.93 goals versus 0.50 for the hosts, and 79% of away matches feature a goal in the second half, therefore from matches level at half-time the away side goes on to win in roughly 44% of cases. Given these figures the most likely scenario (≈31%) is 2/2 (away leading at HT and winning FT), the next strongest is X/2 (draw at Half-Time, away win Full-Time ≈20%), therefore I recommend the 2/2 HT/FT bet.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| ND Slovan Ljubljana | Tabor Sežana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tabor Sežana is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
0.96 goals / match - ND Slovan Ljubljana · 1.21 goals / match - Tabor Sežana
Tabor Sežana is 79% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.79 goals / match - ND Slovan Ljubljana · 1 goals / match - Tabor Sežana
ND Slovan Ljubljana scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Tabor Sežana keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 matches).
Tabor Sežana scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while ND Slovan Ljubljana keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ND Slovan Ljubljana
Over / Under - Tabor Sežana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tabor Sežana is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - ND Slovan Ljubljana · 1.5 pts / match - Tabor Sežana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ND Slovan Ljubljana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tabor Sežana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
ND Slovan Ljubljana
Tabor Sežana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| ND Slovan Ljubljana | Liga | Tabor Sežana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.75 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 50% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 28% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 74% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ND Slovan LjubljanaGoalŽan Baskera
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: ND Slovan Ljubljana 0 - 0 - 1 Tabor Sežana. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of ND Slovan Ljubljana vs Tabor Sežana?
The 2. SNL match finished ND Slovan Ljubljana 5:1 Tabor Sežana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before ND Slovan Ljubljana vs Tabor Sežana?
ND Slovan Ljubljana score 0.96 goals per game on average and Tabor Sežana 1.21. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 54% of ND Slovan Ljubljana's matches and 39% of Tabor Sežana's.
What form are ND Slovan Ljubljana and Tabor Sežana in?
Over the last 5 games ND Slovan Ljubljana have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tabor Sežana 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ND Slovan Ljubljana vs Tabor Sežana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


